CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04271462Updated Feb 11, 2021

The Influence of Two Different CO2 Absorbers on Sevoflurane Consumption During Anaesthesia

An observational study in Anesthesia, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-11.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
38
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Traditional sodalime CO2 absorbers are known to not only react with CO2 but also with sevoflurane. Therewith, a potentially harmful compound (compound A) is formed that can be nephrotoxic. In the United States, the sevoflurane manufacturer therefore recommends keeping the FGF (FGF) at >2.0 L min-1 if a sodalime CO2 absorbent is used. Amsorb Plus® (Datex-Ohmeda Inc., Madison, WI, USA), is a novel type of CO2 absorbent that does not react with sevoflurane. This allows the FGF to be reduced to 0.5 L min-1. This has two important advantages: (i) less fresh sevoflurane is added to the circle system, and (ii) the sevoflurane that is in the system does not react with the CO2 absorber.

Sevoflurane is a potent greenhouse gas with a 100 year CO2-equivalents of 120. Measures that can reduce the consumption of volatile anaesthetics could make a significant contribution to reducing the carbon footprint of the operative process. Additionally, Amsorb Plus® canisters seem to have a longer life span than sodalime canisters and do not need to be disposed of via toxic waste stream, but via domestic waste.

In this study, we were interested if (i) the use of Amsorb Plus leads to a reduction in sevoflurane usage and therefore contribute to a reduction in the CO2 footprint of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, (ii) Does the use of Amsorb Plus® lead to a reduction in the amount of (toxic) waste produced by operating theatres?

Comparator: a traditional sodalime CO2 absorber (Medisorb™ Multi-Absorber Original, CareFusion, Helsinki, Finland).

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing general anesthesia with sevoflurane for > 2 hours.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient
  • non-pregnant
  • ASA-I to ASA-III
  • undergoing Sevoflurane based general anaesthesia (in a therapeutic concentration of 1.0 MAC)
  • Elective surgery
  • Scheduled operating time >2 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable/ unwilling to participate
  • ASA-IV or higher
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Known pregnancy
  • Contra-indications for sevoflurane anaesthesia
  • Emergency surgery
  • Scheduled operating time \<2 hours.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Study group

    Patients undergoing surgery (\>120 min) with the use of sevoflurane based general anaesthesia (in 1.0 MAC concentration).

    Other: Comparing two CO2 absorbers in the ventilator circuit

Interventions

  • OtherComparing two CO2 absorbers in the ventilator circuit

    General anaesthesia will be induced with a standardised regimen (propofol 0.8-2.5 mg·kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 - 0.5 µg·kg-1 and rocuronium 0.5 - 1 mg·kg-1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane targeted at 1 MAC end tidal concentration (corrected for age using the formula by Mapleson) in 40% O2. Different ventilator settings will be compared for 30 minutes (in randomised order): I. Sodalime, FGF 2.0 L min-1. II. Amsorb Plus®, FGF 2.0 L min-1. III. Soda lime, FGF, 0.5 L min-1. IV. Amsorb Plus®, FGF 0.5 L min-1. FGF=fresh gas flow.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Influence of CO2 filters on Sevoflurane consumption

    Comparing Sevoflurane consumption between Amsorb Plus and sodalime CO2 absorbers

    Time frame: 30 minutes per filter

Secondary outcomes

  1. Influence of fresh gas flow on Sevoflurane consumption

    Comparing Sevoflurane consumption between 0.5 and 2.0 liters per minute fresh gas flow

    Time frame: 30 minutes per fresh gas flow setting

Other outcomes

  1. Estimated CO2 footprint and environmental impact of general anaesthesia with two different CO2 filters

    Estimate the CO2 footprint and environmental impact of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane comparing two different CO2 filters using life cycle analysis methods.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  2. Estimated cost of general anaesthesia with two different CO2 filters

    Estimate the total cost of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane comparing two different CO2 filters using life cycle analysis methods.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  3. Estimated CO2 footprint and environmental impact of general anaesthesia with two fresh gas flow settings

    Estimate the CO2 footprint of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane comparing two different fresh gas flow settings using life cycle analysis methods.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  4. Estimated cost of general anaesthesia with two fresh gas flow settings

    Estimate the total cost of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane comparing two different fresh gas flow settings.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
    Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04271462
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Responsible party
Niek Sperna Weiland (Staff Anaesthesiologist (MD PhD), Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
Start date
Feb 12, 2020
Primary completion
May 29, 2020
Completion
May 29, 2020
Last update
Feb 11, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion