CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04256200Updated Apr 15, 2021

Efficacy of Dienogest Versus Oral Contraceptive Pills on Pain Associated With Endometriosis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Dienogest 2 MG Oral Tablet and Yasmin in Endometriosis, sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Lebanon. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-15.

Sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2017, registered Jan 2020).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, frequently associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and abdomino-pelvic pain limiting quality of life. Most medical therapies aim to alleviate the severity of symptoms. Recent guidelines recommend the use of either OCPs or progestins as a first-line treatment of pain associated with endometriosis. The effectiveness of both OCPs and dienogest, a fourth-generation progestin, for endometriosis treatment has been demonstrated. The literature is rich with data comparing the use of Visanne or OCPs to placebo or GnRH analogs. However, there are no head to head studies comparing their efficacy in the management of endometriosis associated pain. The study aims to evaluate if Dienogest (Visanne) is not inferior in efficacy to oral contraceptive pills (Yasmin) in controlling pain associated with endometriosis?

Read the detailed description

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which induces a chronic inflammatory reaction. It is an estrogen-dependent associated with pelvic pain and infertility. It is a relatively common chronic gynecological disease that affects approximately 10% of reproductive aged women. Patients with endometriosis often suffer from dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, and chronic abdominal or pelvic pain, resulting in a severely limited quality of life. The aim of most medical therapies is to alleviate the severity of symptoms. Commonly used hormonal therapies include combined oral contraceptives (OCP), progestogens, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, androgens and antiprogestogens, all of which are considered to have similar efficacy but different tolerability profiles, which are often suboptimal. To date, the most widely used agent for the medical treatment of endometriosis is oral contraceptive (albeit off-label). In particular, evidence supporting the efficacy of estrogen-progestin therapy (EP) in pain control and reducing the risk of recurrence in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. In recent years, the effectiveness of dienogest, a fourth-generation progestin, for endometriosis treatment has been demonstrated. Dienogest seems to be as effective as gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-a (GnRH-a) in terms of endometriosis-related pelvic pain improvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Visanne versus OCP treatment of endometriosis associated pelvic pain in a double-blinded randomized controlled pilot study. It is a two armed pilot study; each group will include 50 patients. Women with endometriosis will be randomized to receive either DNG (n=50) or OCPs (n=50). The diagnosis of endometriosis will be by clinical evaluation, laparotomy, laparoscopy, or imaging analysis (combination of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography) of endometriotic ovarian chocolate cysts.The first group will receive Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day, orally for 24 weeks. The second group will receive monophasic combined OCP (Yasmin, Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone) daily for 24 weeks. The treating physician and the patients will be blinded to the treatment option. The relief of symptoms and efficacy will be evaluated by questionnaire on follow up visits at 3 and 6 month of the treatment. Data collected will be analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. We hypothesize that there will be no difference in pain scores, efficacy and safety between the two treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometriosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • endometriosis
  • oral contraceptive pills
  • progestin
03

In context

Endometriosis

901 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 259 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 64 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Endometriosis.

Browse Endometriosis studies →

Lead sponsor

American University of Beirut Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 152 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients confirmed or suspected of endometriosis on clinical evaluation (VAS score more than 5 and presence of subjective symptoms), surgical or imaging studies, and not taking any pain killer or other hormonal treatment for the moment
  • Age 20-45
  • Regular menstrual cycles
  • The presence of subjective symptoms during menstruation (at least one from among lower abdominal pain, lumbago, defecation pain, nausea, and headache)
  • The presence of subjective symptoms during non-menstruation (at least one from among lower abdominal pain, lumbago, defecation pain, dyspareunia, and pain on internal examination).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undiagnosed genital bleeding
  • Use of any hormonal therapy for endometriosis within 16 weeks before enrollment
  • A history of severe adverse drug reactions or hypersensitivity to steroid hormone
  • Having undergone surgery therapy or surgical examination for endometriosis within a menstrual cycle before the start of medication
  • Previous failure of treatment with the OCP used in the current study
  • Contraindications to OCP or Dienogest use
  • Smokers >35
  • A history or complication of thrombosis/embolism
  • Migraines with aura
  • Depression
  • Patients on anti-epileptics
  • Diabetes Mellitus with vascular involvement
  • Liver diseases
  • Known or suspected sex hormone dependent malignancies
  • Repeat surgery for endometriosis
  • Patient consulting for infertility
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Planning for pregnancy in near future.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dienogest

    Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day orally for 24 weeks

    Drug: Dienogest 2 MG Oral Tablet

  • Active comparator
    Oral Contraceptive Pills

    Oral contraceptive pill (Yasmin, 0.03mg Ethinyl Estradiol and 3mg Drospirenone) orally daily for 24 weeks

    Drug: Yasmin

Interventions

  • DrugDienogest 2 MG Oral Tablet

    Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day, orally for 24 weeks versus combined OCP (Yasmin, 0.03mg

    Also known as: Visanne

  • DrugYasmin

    0.03mg Ethinyl Estradiol and 3mg Drospirenone daily for 24 weeks

    Also known as: combined oral contraceptive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain

    be the absolute change in endometriosis -associated pelvic pain from baseline to end of treatment, assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): with "absence of pain" corresponding to the value "0" and "unbearable pain" corresponding to the value "10"

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact on Quality of life

    Outcome quality of life will be assessed using Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP30) with each item of this questionnaire can be answered by choosing one of the following (Never, rarely,sometimes, often and always). The endometriosis health profile is a patient-generated questionnaire in which the items were developed from interviews with women with the condition ( Obtained from Oxford University Press) .

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. incidence of side effects

    Incidence of possible side effects including headache, migraine,nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain/discomfort, breast pain or tenderness, mood swings, premenstrual syndrome, decreased libido, fatigue, weight changes and menstrual irregularities

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Patient Tolerability

    Assessing tolerability to side effects via numerical scale from zero to ten ( zero not bothersome at all , ten maximum possible)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • American University of Beirut
    Beirut, Lebanon
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • El Taha L, Abu Musa A, Khalifeh D, Khalil A, Abbasi S, Nassif J. Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.029. Epub 2021 Oct 30. PubMed 34826668 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04256200
Lead sponsor
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Responsible party
Antoine Abou Moussa (Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology/principal investigator, American University of Beirut Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2020
Start date
Feb 7, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2021

Study contacts

Antoine Abu Musa, M.D.
Contact
aa06@aub.edu.lb
+9611350000 ext. 5840
Antoine Abu Musa, MD
principal investigator · American University of Beirut Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion