ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04251377SINBIOSE-HUpdated May 6, 2026

Single-stage Surgery With Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Coated Implants Versus Two Stage Surgery for Secondary Prevention of Complex Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection

An interventional study of Defensive Antiadhesive Coating DAC®, Novagenit SRL in Hip Prosthesis Infection, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne. Active, not recruiting at 14 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Each year, around 1500 infected Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) need non-conservative surgery, remaining an issue for patients and healthcare units. The recommended treatment, relying on cohort reviews and international consensus follows a two-stage protocol. This protocol implies a first surgery to remove all infected implants and at least 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment without implant, then usually an antibiotic-free period and only then a second surgery to put back new implants and start the rehabilitation protocol, with usually more than a week of a second hospital stay. Between both surgeries, full-weight bearing is prohibited and joint stiffness and/or pain are rather usual complications. Failure rate is estimated at 10% in this two-stage strategy. The single-stage procedure (i.e. implanting back a new prosthesis during the same surgery after implant removal, synovectomy and lavage) is thought to be less susceptible to late functional complications (i.e. pain, stiffness and muscle deficiency) with a shorter, single hospital stay.

Although, with single-stage surgery, infection control could be less efficient because most pathogens produce during the first hours of infection an antibiotic-resistant layer called biofilm, allowing them to colonize and adhere to foreign objects like implants. This single-surgery protocol thus highly relies on antibiotics and has a list of contra-indications (based on experts' consensus): the presence of damaged soft tissues or a sinus tract, unknown pathogens, difficult to treat micro-organisms, severe immunosuppression and for many surgeons, each time a bone graft is necessary. Most of these contra-indications are directly related to the biofilm.

As no randomized control trial has ever compared single-stage versus two-stage surgery, the level of evidence for recommending one procedure over the other is low.

We conducted a survey that showed that most of the French reference centers have already switched to single stage surgery for single-stage non contra-indicated cases.

An antibiotic-loaded hydrogel coating (Defensive Antiadhesive Coating®, Novagenit SRL), has been proven to mechanically prevent the biofilm formation, while allowing a prolonged intraarticular antibiotic release, in a randomized controlled trial in primary prevention of infection in THA.

The addition of this biofilm inhibitor to a single-stage surgery might stand as a promising strategy for secondary prevention of peri-prosthetic hip joint infection. Moreover, using this device to prevent biofilm formation could expand one stage surgery to patients that are "normally" contra-indicated to one stage surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Prosthesis Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Surgery
  • Biofilm inhibitor
  • Chronic infections
  • Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA)
  • Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC®)
  • Novagenit®
  • Hip Prosthesis
03

In context

Persistent Infection

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Persistent Infection; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 104 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Persistent Infection.

Browse Persistent Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne is the lead sponsor of 597 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Social security affiliation
  • Signed
  • Chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria :
  • Two positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms
  • or a sinus tract communicating with the joint,
  • or having 3 of 5 minor criteria:

    • Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR);
    • Elevated synovial fluid White Blood Cell (WBC) count or change of ++ on leukocyte esterase test strip;
    • Elevated synovial fluid Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Percentage (PMN%);
    • Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue;
    • A single positive culture.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with to hydrogel components (hyaluronic acid and/or poly-lactic acid) known of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC)®
  • Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test (performed in women of childbearing age before inclusion)
  • \< 3 months
  • Expected use of a cemented implant by the surgical team (for the treatment surgical protocol)
  • Unable to give
  • Patients under guardianship or curators
  • Refusal to participate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-stage surgery + DAC® + topical antibiotics

    Experimental group is composed of single-stage procedure associated to the use of biofilm inhibitor (Defensive Antibacterial Coating® DAC®) and topical antibiotics=new strategy

    Device: Defensive Antiadhesive Coating DAC®, Novagenit SRL

  • No intervention
    control group : two-stage surgery

    Control group is composed of two-stage procedure without biofilm inhibitor (standard protocol)

Interventions

  • DeviceDefensive Antiadhesive Coating DAC®, Novagenit SRL

    DAC gel, mixed with topical antibiotics is applied on the surface of the implants before implantation, in a sterile environment in the operating room. The topical antibiotics will be added to the reconstituted DAC® gel preparation, at the discretion of the physician, on the basis of pre-operative culture.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of clinically diagnosed infection relapse of the periprosthetic joint

    The periprosthetic joint infection is defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria: * Two positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms * or a sinus tract communicating with the joint, * or having 3 of 5 minor criteria: * Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); * Elevated synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count; * Elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%); * Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue; * A single positive culture.

    Time frame: Years : 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Harris Hip Score (HHS) results

    Harris Hip Score (HHS) contains 10 items with maximum score at 100 for a perfect hip and minimum score at 0 for a very bad result.

    Time frame: Years : 2

  2. Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) results

    Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) contains 3 items (pain, mobility and functional hip) with maximum score at 18 for a perfect hip and minimum score at 0 for a very bad result.

    Time frame: Years : 2

  3. Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) results

    Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score contains 6 items (symptoms, stiffness, pain, function and daily life, sport and leisure activities, quality of life) and measure everyday activities with score from 0 to 4.

    Time frame: Years : 2

  4. Oxford-12 results

    Oxford-12 allows to know the feelings of the patient during the last 4 weeks felt from 1 to 5 (satisfaction score).

    Time frame: Years : 2

  5. Death rate (%)

    Analysis of death rate by group.

    Time frame: Years : 2

  6. Post-operative complications

    Analysis of post-operative complications by group.

    Time frame: Years : 2

  7. Revision surgery for any cause other than infection

    Analysis of revision surgery for any cause other than infection.

    Time frame: Years : 2

07

Study locations

14 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyer B, Cazorla C, Carricajo A, Labruyere C, Chapelle C, Presles E, Zufferey P, Botelho-Nevers E. Single-stage surgery with antibiotic-loaded hydrogel-coated implants versus two-stage surgery for chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection in French tertiary referral hospitals: the SINBIOSE-H non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 25;15(2):e085146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085146. PubMed 40000087 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04251377
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2020
Start date
Sep 30, 2021
Primary completion
May 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Bertrand BOYER, MD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion