CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04245683Updated Mar 7, 2023

Feasibility of Non-Operative Management of Rectal Cancer in a Rural Population

An observational study in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by Bassett Healthcare. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-07.

Sponsored by Bassett Healthcare · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational research study. Patients with rectal cancer can choose different courses of treatment. This study will follow these patients over the course of approximately six years, depending on their treatment. Patients will be monitored through clinic visits and survey assessments to see how they do, how they feel regarding their treatment choices, and their outcomes. The surveys will analyze the impact of the patients' treatment choices, as well as patient adherence, in a rural setting.

Read the detailed description

Standards of care for patients with rectal cancer are evolving over time. Surgery for rectal cancer is associated with significant short- and long-term side effects for patients, including changes in bowel function, self-image, ability to work, and sexual function. Emerging data indicates that some patients experiencing complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy (treatment given prior to surgery) may be able to forego surgery, without compromising cancer outcomes. Current National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines for the treatment of rectal cancer states that, "...the panel believes that a non-operative management approach may be considered in centers with experienced multi-disciplinary teams, after a careful discussion with the patient of his or her risk tolerance." Between 15-27% of patients achieve a complete pathological response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which is administered before surgery, and have low rates of local recurrence and high rates of overall survival. Treating these patients without surgery has been a focus in recent years. Supporting data is mainly from large academic institutions, which have pioneered the approach. There is very little data on this approach in rural populations. While this approach is not considered to represent the standard of care, increasing numbers of patients are choosing to pursue it. It would be useful to accumulate data on treatment of rectal cancer in a rural setting.

The study will collect and analyze data on patient preference for operative versus non-operative management, as well as patient adherence to the careful surveillance regimen required for those electing nonoperative management. In addition, patient outcomes with a focus on quality of life, as measured on a standardized tool at multiple points before, during, and after treatment will be analyzed.

Patients will undergo an initial staging evaluation, regardless of study consent, to include:

  • Physical examination
  • Endoscopy
  • CEA, CBC, CMP
  • Pelvic MRI +/- IV contrast preferred, or if MRI contraindicated, endoscopic ultrasound
  • CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis

Patients will also complete the following survey assessments at the time of study consent:

  • Pain Assessment
  • QOL- CR29
  • QOL- C30
  • QOL- Patient Satisfaction Survey

Patients with potentially resectable, newly diagnosed, rectal cancer will receive one of three treatment protocols based on patient and physician preference. These treatment options are considered normal standard of care and are available to all patients regardless of study participation.

Treatment choices are:

  1. 5-Fluorouracil or Capecitabine with radiotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by a break of 8-12 weeks. Patients who elect this treatment plan will be reevaluated/restaged as described below, then will receive an additional 18 weeks of chemotherapy. Depending on the patient's decision regarding surgery, chemotherapy will be initiated either 4 weeks post-operatively or immediately after restaging for patients electing to forgo surgery.
  2. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) option 1: 6 cycles of Leucovorin Calcium, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) over 12 weeks, followed by 6 weeks 5-Fluorouracil or Capecitabine with radiation, then a break of 10-12 weeks 3. TNT option 2: 6 weeks 5-Fluorouracil or Capecitabine with radiation, followed by 6 cycles of FOLFOX over 12 weeks, then a break of 10-12 weeks.

Patients will be monitored throughout their treatments. Treatment will be held at the discretion of the medical oncologist or radiation oncologist for severe skin reactions, severe diarrhea, severe urinary difficulty, admission to the hospital, and neutropenia with or without fever. At the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, there will be a 10-12 week observation period to allow for healing and resolution of inflammation. Patients who do not complete neoadjuvant therapy will be removed from the study. Patients who do complete neoadjuvant therapy will then undergo evaluation of their response using the modalities listed below: Physical Examination Endoscopy CEA Pelvic MRI +/- IV contrast or EUS Biopsy at surgeons discretion of residual mucosal abnormalities

Patients who do not achieve a complete tumor response would not be eligible for non-surgical management, but would continue to be followed for survival.

Those achieving complete tumor responses, as defined by no evidence of tumor on physical examination, endoscopy, MRI, and with a normal CEA value, will then have further discussion with their treating physicians regarding operative vs. non-operative management. The choice of operative or non-operative management will be left to the discretion of the physicians and the patient. Patients will also be presented at the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board to receive input on care.

After patients have been restaged, but prior to any further treatment, the following survey assessments will occur:

  • Pain Assessment
  • QOL- CR29
  • QOL- C30
  • QOL- Patient Satisfaction Survey

Operative patients will undergo surgery. They will then either complete their chemotherapy treatment if the patient has not already done so, or go directly to surveillance. Patients will be followed by surveillance for a total of 5 years post operatively. Patients will have CT imaging of the chest/abdomen/pelvis every 6-12 months for 5 years following resection, per NCCN guidelines for patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer.

Per NCCN guidelines, non-operative patients will either complete their chemotherapy treatment if the patient has not already done so, or go directly to surveillance. Surveillance will consist of having CEA, endoscopy, and imaging (CT scans and MRI) every 3 months for 1 year; then CEA and endoscopy every 3 months with imaging (CT scans and MRI) every 6 months for the next 2 years; and then CEA and endoscopy every 6 months with imaging (CT scans and MRI) every year for 2 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,762 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 517 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 160 across 413 observational studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Bassett Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with biopsy proven , resectable rectal cancer

Inclusion criteria

For a patient to be considered eligible for this study, ALL of the following conditions must be met:

  1. Age 18 or greater
  2. ECOG PS 0-2
  3. Stage II or III, newly diagnosed, biopsy proven, rectal cancer
  4. No prior treatment for rectal cancer
  5. No prior pelvic radiotherapy
  6. Willing to undergo study related testing and monitoring after treatment
  7. Women of childbearing potential must rule out pregnancy within 2 weeks prior to registration with a blood test or urine study
  8. Women must not be pregnant or breastfeeding
  9. Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are NOT considered eligible for this study if any of the following conditions apply:

  1. Patients with metastatic disease
  2. Patients that are not candidates for surgery
  3. Patients that refuse neoadjuvant treatment
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Operative Group

    Patients who select operative treatment and follow up after successful neoadjuvant treatment.

    Procedure: Bowel/rectal resection

  • Non-operative Group

    Patients who select non-operative follow up after successful neoadjuvant treatment

    Other: non-operative follow up

Interventions

  • ProcedureBowel/rectal resection

    surgical removal of the portion of the rectum where the tumor was originally identified

  • Othernon-operative follow up

    patients who choose the non-operative option will be required to adhere to a very intensive follow up protocol, including endoscopy and CT imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. patient preferences for operative vs. non-operative management of rectal cancer

    Number of eligible patients who select operative versus non-operative management after successfully completing approximately 20 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment and the 10-12 week post treatment observation period

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient adherence to surveillance protocols

    Percentage of patients who choose non-operative management who successfully comply with the post-neoadjuvant treatment surveillance protocol

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Bassett Healthcare Network
    Cooperstown, New York 13326, United States
    • Jennifer Victory, RN · Contact · jennifer.victory@bassett.org · 607-547-6965
    • Katelyn Tessier · Contact · katelyn.tessier@bassett.org · 607-547-3073
    • Eric Bravin, MD · Principal investigator
    • Raul Monzon, MD · Sub investigator
    • Luis Oceguera, MD · Sub investigator
    • Marcy Canary, MD · Sub investigator
    • Bharatsinh Gharia, MD · Sub investigator
    • Bryan Lee, DO · Sub investigator
    • James Leonardo, MD · Sub investigator
    • Anush Patel, MD · Sub investigator
    • Timothy Korytko, MD · Sub investigator
    • Julia Manzerova, MD · Sub investigator
    • Alfred Tinger, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04245683
Lead sponsor
Bassett Healthcare
Responsible party
Eric Bravin (attending physician - medical oncology, Bassett Healthcare) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2020
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2023

Study contacts

Jennifer Victory, RN
Contact
jennifer.victory@bassett.org
6075476965
Katelyn Tessier
Contact
kately.tessier@bassett.org
607-547-3073
Eric Bravin, MD
principal investigator · Bassett Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion