An interventional study of Caterna Virtual Reality and Spectacles(Best optical corrected distance vision) in Amblyopia, sponsored by Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software. Status unknown at 4 sites in China. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-05.
Sponsored by Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
It aims to find the effectiveness and the safety of Virtual Reality (Caterna, DOBOSO, item code: SJ-VRS2018) to facilitate amblyopia treatment combining spectacles and occlusion. And it also aims to test whether amblyopia treatment outcomes with spectacles, occlusion and VR are significant better than those without VR, but with spectacles and occlusion.
The experiment arm is designed to use the Caterna VR to treat amblyopia for total consistent 13 weeks, 3 times per week, while the control arm is not.
Both arms are best optical correction and with patch the non-amblyopia eye 2 hours or 6 hours per day.
All eyes are followed up for total 13 weeks.
The amblyopia eye will see the video content from Caterna VR a little bit earlier (12 ms) than the other non-amblyopia eye.
Also, the illumination and contrast are both adjusted to balance 2 eyes' clarity.
One VR treatment sequence is 30 minutes with 5 minutes break in the middle.
189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 60 across 137 interventional studies indexed under Amblyopia.
Browse Amblyopia studies →Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The arm will use the virtual reality headset reproduces dynamic video content with perceptual learning and binocular perception (including stereopsis) that is visually perceived a little bit faster, brighter, and higher contrast to the amblyopia eyes . The each VR therapy length is 30 minutes with 5 minute break after 15 minutes' therapy sequence, 3 times per week, total 13 weeks. All amblyopia eyes are best optical correction or combining patching non-amblyopia eyes if there're more than 2 lines difference best corrected vision acuity.
Device: Caterna Virtual Reality · Device: Spectacles(Best optical corrected distance vision) · Device: Patch
This arm of amblyopia eyes are all best optical correction or combining patching non-amblyopia eyes if there're more than 2 lines difference best corrected vision acuity. No VR therapy.
Device: Spectacles(Best optical corrected distance vision) · Device: Patch
Vivid interactive games of perceptual learning content, with artificial intelligent sound and scores to feedback vision and actions results, which can be connected to the supervision of cellphone software"Wechat" to upload vision acuity and choose 2 eyes' video output automaticly.
Also known as: SJ-VRS2018, DOBOSO VR, Vision Therapy Software
Each eye has best corrected vision spectacles with best corrected optical lens.
Also known as: Optical correction
2 hours patch to the non-amblyopia eye if the other amblyopia eye is mild or moderate amblyopia; 6 hours patch to the non-amblyopia eye if the other amblyopia eye is severe abmlyopia
Also known as: Occlusion
Effectiveness of amblyopia treatment with VR
General Effectiveness=Number of both cured eyes and effective eyes from total number×100%
Time frame: 13 weeks
Effectiveness of 8 weeks' VR amblyopia treatment
General Effectiveness=Number of both cured eyes and effective eyes from total number×100%
Time frame: 8 weeks
Effectiveness of 4 weeks' VR amblyopia treatment
General Effectiveness=Number of both cured eyes and effective eyes from total number×100%
Time frame: 4 weeks
Stereopsis: distance and near, respectively
Ratio of stereopsis perception=(Number of stereopsis perception /Total number)\*100%
Time frame: 13 weeks
Contrast sensitivity function(CSF)
Difference between those final CSF and baseline CSF
Time frame: 13 weeks
Severe Adverse Event Number
Total number of Severe Adverse Event
Time frame: 13 weeks
Plan to share: No
Started Sep 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2020, 15 months after the start.
Of 71 interventional studies with no phase under Amblyopia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 15 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software