ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04236596Updated Aug 20, 2024Results posted

Pudendal Nerve Mapping Towards Improved Neuromodulation for Urinary Retention

An interventional study of Participants received a Neurostimulator, which was used to map the pudendal nerve in Urinary Retention and Underactive Bladder, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-20.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to map the pudendal nerve. In this study the researchers will examine subjects who are already receiving an implanted stimulator at their pudendal nerve as part of their normal clinical care.

Read the detailed description

The pudendal nerve goes to the urethra, anus, and other areas of the pelvic floor. Electrical stimulation of this nerve can help with bladder problems and pelvic pain. Researchers do not understand how the nerve anatomy is different between people. Successfully mapping the pudendal nerve may help improve the medical care for future patients with bladder problems, pelvic pain, bowel problems, and sexual problems.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Retention
  • Underactive Bladder

Keywords

  • pudendal nerve mapping
03

In context

Urinary Retention

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Retention; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 90 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Retention.

Browse Urinary Retention studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,506 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 169 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 133 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically referred as having bladder problems that have not responded to conservative treatment. Normal clinical care includes referral to implant of Medtronic Interstim neurostimulator at the pudendal nerve. Fully eligible to receive an Interstim implant.
  • Adult (18 or older), capable of providing own and communicating clearly with research team
  • Capable of speaking, reading, and understanding English, as all study questionnaires are standardized assessments only available in English
  • Capable of attending all experimental sessions (Visit 1: pre-stage-1 imaging, Visit 2: stage-1 surgery, Visit 3: CT after stage-2 surgery, Visit 3: cystometrogram test)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion

  • Implanted materials that prohibit magnetic imaging
  • Any medical problems that prevent an individual from laying flat in an MRI or CT scanner, are are claustrophobic.
  • Areflexive or atonic bladder
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant. If a woman of wishes to participate in this study, they will be pre-screened with a test to detect pregnancy.
  • Diagnosed neurogenic bladder, pudendal nerve damage, lower motor dysfunction, or other conditions that would affect the neural circuits involved in micturition.
  • Unwilling to allow de-identified data to be stored for future use or shared with other researchers.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study participants

    Study participants received an implanted neurostimulator at their pudendal nerve as part of normal clinical care. This was not an intervention study as clinical care was not modified based on study participation. Participants consented to undergo in the research study steps towards mapping of the pudendal nerve.

    Device: Participants received a Neurostimulator, which was used to map the pudendal nerve

Interventions

  • DeviceParticipants received a Neurostimulator, which was used to map the pudendal nerve

    Participants in study received neurostimulator at their pudendal nerve as part of their normal clinical care. This neurostimulator was used to map the nerve.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Evoked Bladder Contractions of at Least 20 Centimeters of Water (cmH2O) During the Stage-4 Test

    The primary outcome measure in this study was an evoked bladder contraction of at least 20 centimeters of water (cmH2O) during the cystometrogram. These bladder contractions were evoked by applying nerve stimulation to the pudendal nerve through testing of the participant's implanted stimulator. Measure reflects number of participants who experienced an evoked bladder contraction of at least 20 centimeters of water during nerve stimulation.

    Time frame: Visit 4, approximately 10 weeks after consent

Secondary outcomes

  1. Selectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Participant Stimulation

    Selectivity refers to the degree in which a nerve could be stimulated without stimulating other nerves. SI was calculated for each sensor recording from locations innervated by distal pudendal nerve branches during the visit-2 implant procedure. This includes pressure sensors in the urethra innervated by the perineal nerve and anal electromyography (EMG) innervated by the ischeal rectal nerve. The SI calculation used here is on a scale of 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no response at all from the nerve. The closer the number is to 1, the more selective the nerve stimulated.

    Time frame: Visit 2: Stage-1 (approximately 3 weeks after consent)

  2. Selectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Simulated Model Stimulation

    Selectivity is the degree to which part of a nerve could be stimulated without stimulating other nerve parts. For each participant who had successful MRI and CT images, a computational model was created to simulate electrical stimulation of axons distributed in two primary pudendal fascicles: perineal and rectal. The SI of stimulation does not indicate a positive or negative result in this outcome; rather, it shows the relative potential for activating just a single nerve fascicle. The negative/positive designation identifies the regional nerve activation, with -1 representing only perineal fascicle activation, +1 representing only rectal activation, and 0 indicating equal activation of both fascicles.

    Time frame: Approximately one year and four months after consent

  3. Measurement of Effect of Pudendal Nerve Stimulation on Urethral Leak Point Pressure During the Stage-4 Test

    A secondary outcome measure was a goal to examine the effect of selective pudendal nerve stimulation on urethral leak point pressure during the cystometrogram.

    Time frame: Visit 4, approximately 10 weeks after consent

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Participants
Started22
Completed14
Not completed8
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Participants did not retain implant for entire trial3
Withdrew: Participants did not receive implant at all4

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Evoked Bladder Contractions of at Least 20 Centimeters of Water (cmH2O) During the Stage-4 Test

The primary outcome measure in this study was an evoked bladder contraction of at least 20 centimeters of water (cmH2O) during the cystometrogram. These bladder contractions were evoked by applying nerve stimulation to the pudendal nerve through testing of the participant's implanted stimulator. Measure reflects number of participants who experienced an evoked bladder contraction of at least 20 centimeters of water during nerve stimulation.

Time frame:
Visit 4, approximately 10 weeks after consent
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Evoked Bladder Contractions of at Least 20 Centimeters of Water (cmH2O) During the Stage-4 Test
ParticipantsParticipants Undergoing Cystometrogram
Number of Participants With Evoked Bladder Contractions of at Least 20 Centimeters of Water (cmH2O) During the Stage-4 Test0
SecondarySelectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Participant Stimulation

Selectivity refers to the degree in which a nerve could be stimulated without stimulating other nerves. SI was calculated for each sensor recording from locations innervated by distal pudendal nerve branches during the visit-2 implant procedure. This includes pressure sensors in the urethra innervated by the perineal nerve and anal electromyography (EMG) innervated by the ischeal rectal nerve. The SI calculation used here is on a scale of 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no response at all from the nerve. The closer the number is to 1, the more selective the nerve stimulated.

Time frame:
Visit 2: Stage-1 (approximately 3 weeks after consent)
Reported as:
Mean · index
Selectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Participant Stimulation
indexParticipants Undergoing Stage-2 Implant Data Collection
Perineal nerve0.57 ± 0.29
Rectal nerve0.90 ± 0.22
SecondarySelectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Simulated Model Stimulation

Selectivity is the degree to which part of a nerve could be stimulated without stimulating other nerve parts. For each participant who had successful MRI and CT images, a computational model was created to simulate electrical stimulation of axons distributed in two primary pudendal fascicles: perineal and rectal. The SI of stimulation does not indicate a positive or negative result in this outcome; rather, it shows the relative potential for activating just a single nerve fascicle. The negative/positive designation identifies the regional nerve activation, with -1 representing only perineal fascicle activation, +1 representing only rectal activation, and 0 indicating equal activation of both fascicles.

Time frame:
Approximately one year and four months after consent
Reported as:
Mean · index
Selectivity Index (SI) for Selective Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Branches for Simulated Model Stimulation
indexSelectivity Index
Rectal dominant0.577 ± 0.193
Perineal dominant-0.533 ± 0.284
Mixed0.288 ± 0.666
SecondaryMeasurement of Effect of Pudendal Nerve Stimulation on Urethral Leak Point Pressure During the Stage-4 Test

A secondary outcome measure was a goal to examine the effect of selective pudendal nerve stimulation on urethral leak point pressure during the cystometrogram.

Time frame:
Visit 4, approximately 10 weeks after consent

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Approximately 2 years and 8 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Participants0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study Participants
Mean54.37 ± 13.15
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Participants
Female18
Male4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participants
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino20
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White21
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Study Participants
United States22
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All de-identified IPD collected during the trial will be available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Will be available starting twelve months following publication of study findings.

Access criteria: Anyone who wishes to access the data.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04236596
Responsible party
Timothy Bruns (Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2020
Start date
Sep 14, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 8, 2023
Completion
Jun 8, 2023
Results posted
Aug 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 20, 2024

Study contacts

Tim Bruns, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Priyanka Gupta, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion