CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04223778Updated Feb 18, 2026Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of a Switch to Doravirine/Islatravir in Participants With HIV-1 (MK-8591A-017)

A Phase 3 interventional study of DOR/ISL and ART in HIV Infection, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed at 78 sites in 15 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-18.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
672
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a switch to MK-8591A (a fixed dose combination of doravirine and islatravir) in human immunodeficiency virus -1 (HIV-1)-infected participants virologically suppressed on a protocol-specified antiretroviral regimen. The primary hypothesis is that a switch to MK-8591A will be non-inferior to continued treatment with baseline antiretroviral therapy (ART) as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infection

Browse trials for

03

In context

HIV Infections

4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 672 is above the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Is human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) positive
  • Has been receiving continuous, stable oral 2-drug or 3-drug combination (± pharmacokinetic (PK) booster) with documented viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL) for ≥3 months prior to signing informed consent and has no history of prior virologic treatment failure on any past or current regimen.
  • Females are eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP); is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method, or be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse as their preferred and usual lifestyle; a WOCBP must have a negative highly sensitive pregnancy test ([urine or serum] as required by local regulations) within 24 hours before the first dose of study intervention; if a urine test cannot be confirmed as negative (e.g. an ambiguous result), a serum pregnancy test is required. In such cases, the participant must be excluded from participation if the serum pregnancy result is positive

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has HIV-2 infection
  • Has hypersensitivity or other contraindication to any of the components of the study interventions as determined by the investigator
  • Has an active diagnosis of hepatitis due to any cause, including active Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) co-infection
  • Has a history of malignancy ≤5 years prior to signing informed consent except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma
  • Is taking or is anticipated to require systemic immunosuppressive therapy, immune modulators, or any prohibited therapies
  • Is currently taking long-acting cabotegravir-rilpivirine
  • Is currently participating in or has participated in a clinical study with an investigational compound or device from 45 days prior to Day 1 through the study treatment period
  • Has a documented or known virologic resistance to doravirine (DOR)
  • Expects to conceive or donate eggs at any time during the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
672 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)

    Participants who were previously treated with continuous baseline antiretroviral therapy (ART) will receive DOR/ISL, a fixed dose combination (FDC) of 100 mg doravirine (DOR)/0.75 mg islatravir (ISL) orally once daily for 96 weeks.

    Drug: DOR/ISL

  • Active comparator
    Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)

    Participants received continuous baseline ART for 48 weeks. Continuing participants delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL, fixed dose combination of 100 mg DOR/0.75 mg ISL orally once daily, from Week 48 to Week 96, a total DOR/ISL treatment duration of 48 Weeks.

    Drug: DOR/ISL · Drug: ART

Interventions

  • DrugDOR/ISL

    A FDC of 100 mg DOR/ 0.75 mg ISL taken in tablet form, orally, once daily

    Also known as: MK-8591A

  • DrugART

    Baseline ART regimen will be administered as per approved label. ART medication will not be provided by the Sponsor; participants will provide their own ART medications. Allowed drug classes include nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), integrase strand transferase inhibitors (InSTIs), fusion inhibitors, chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonists, post-attachment inhibitor, and pharmacokinetic (PK) boosters.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) ≥50 Copies/mL at Week 48

    HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit were measured by the Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 is presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach.

    Time frame: Week 48

  2. Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 48

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported.

    Time frame: Up to ~48 Weeks

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 48

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE was reported.

    Time frame: Up to ~48 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <40 or <50 Copies/mL at Week 48

    HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit were measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<40 copies/mL or \<50 copies/mL at Week 48 is presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach.

    Time frame: Week 48

  2. Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96

    HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit was measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 is reported for Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 for Group 1 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

    Time frame: Week 96

  3. Group 1: Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96

    HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit was measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 for Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96 is a separate outcome measure and is presented earlier in the record.

    Time frame: Week 96

  4. Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 48

    Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for baseline and 48 weeks. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The percentage change from baseline to Week 48 is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  5. Group 1: Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96

    Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for baseline and 96 weeks. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean percent change from baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T-cell count is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the mean percentage change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 96 for Group 2 participants was not planned or conducted.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 96

  6. Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage Change From Week 48 in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96

    Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for Week 48 and Week 96. The mean percent change from Week 48 to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL Week 48 to Week 96.

    Time frame: Week 48 and Week 96

  7. Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 48

    Viral drug resistance is defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The percentage of participants who demonstrated drug resistance at Week 48 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 48

  8. Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 96

    Viral drug resistance was defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The percentage of participants who demonstrate drug resistance at Week 96 is presented for Group 1 and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with evidence of viral drug resistance-associated substitutions from week 0 to week 48 for Group 1 and Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented earlier in the record.

    Time frame: Week 96

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on PI-containing regimens (including PI- and InSTI-containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on InSTI-based regimens (non-PI containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on all other non-PI- and non-InSTI containing regimens, excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on PI-containing regimens (including PI- and InSTI-containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on InSTI-based regimens (non-PI containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens

    Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on all other non-PI- and non-InSTI containing regimens, excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  15. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48 for InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI-containing Regimens)

    Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The change from baseline in body weight to Week 48 is presented for participants who received InSTI- based regimens.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  16. Group 1: Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs up to Week 96

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with one or more AEs for Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

    Time frame: Up to ~96 Weeks

  17. Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 96

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention for Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

    Time frame: Up to ~96 Weeks

  18. Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs From Week 48 to Week 96

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE from Week 48 up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96.

    Time frame: Weeks 48-96 (up to ~48 weeks)

  19. Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE From Week 48 to Week 96

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE from Week 48 up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96.

    Time frame: Weeks 48-96 (up to ~48 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Started336336
Group 1 participants who received dor/isl from 0-48 weeks3360
Group 1 participants who received dor/isl from 48-96 weeks3220
Group 2 participants who received baseline art from weeks 0-480336
Group 2 participants who delayed switch over to dor/isl weeks 48-960326
Completed279299
Not completed5737
Withdrew: Death11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up45
Withdrew: Physician decision106
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3517
Withdrew: Not reported78

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) ≥50 Copies/mL at Week 48

HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit were measured by the Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 is presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) ≥50 Copies/mL at Week 48
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) ≥50 Copies/mL at Week 480.01.5
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = <.001 · Estimated difference: -1.49 · 95% CI -3.44 to -0.34The Miettinen and Nurminen method was stratified by corrected baseline ART regimen with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 48

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported.

Time frame:
Up to ~48 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 48
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 4880.170.2
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 9.8 · 95% CI 3.3 to 16.3Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 48

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE was reported.

Time frame:
Up to ~48 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 48
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 482.10.3
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 1.8 · 95% CI 0.2 to 4.0Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <40 or <50 Copies/mL at Week 48

HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit were measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<40 copies/mL or \<50 copies/mL at Week 48 is presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <40 or <50 Copies/mL at Week 48
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL94.694.3
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL95.294.3
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.30 · 95% CI -3.28 to 3.90The Miettinen and Nurminen method was stratified by corrected baseline ART regimen with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.89 · 95% CI -2.58 to 4.43The Miettinen and Nurminen method was stratified by corrected baseline ART regimen with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.
SecondaryGroup 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96

HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit was measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 is reported for Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 for Group 1 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

Time frame:
Week 96
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL—0.9 (0.2 to 2.7)
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL—89.6 (85.7 to 92.7)
HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL—89.6 (85.7 to 92.7)
SecondaryGroup 1: Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96

HIV-1 RNA levels in blood samples taken at each visit was measured by the Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, \<40 copies/mL, or \<50 copies/mL at Week 96 for Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96 is a separate outcome measure and is presented earlier in the record.

Time frame:
Week 96
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 1: Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥50 Copies/mL, <40 Copies/mL or <50 Copies/mL at Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL1.2 (0.3 to 3.0)—
HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL86.0 (81.8 to 89.5)—
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL85.7 (81.5 to 89.3)—
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 48

Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for baseline and 48 weeks. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The percentage change from baseline to Week 48 is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage Change
Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 48
Percentage ChangeGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 48-0.7 (-4.0 to 2.6)8.7 (5.4 to 12.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -8.9 · 95% CI -13.4 to -4.5Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
SecondaryGroup 1: Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96

Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for baseline and 96 weeks. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean percent change from baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ T-cell count is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the mean percentage change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 96 for Group 2 participants was not planned or conducted.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 96
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage Change
Group 1: Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96
Percentage ChangeGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1: Percentage Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 964.49 (0.56 to 8.43)—
SecondaryGroup 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage Change From Week 48 in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96

Plasma CD4+ T-Cell Count was measured in cells/mm\^3 for Week 48 and Week 96. The mean percent change from Week 48 to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL Week 48 to Week 96.

Time frame:
Week 48 and Week 96
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage Change
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage Change From Week 48 in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 96
Percentage ChangeGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage Change From Week 48 in CD4+ T-cell Count at Week 965.29 (1.99 to 8.58)0.16 (-2.96 to 3.29)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 48

Viral drug resistance is defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The percentage of participants who demonstrated drug resistance at Week 48 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 48
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 480.00.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 96

Viral drug resistance was defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The percentage of participants who demonstrate drug resistance at Week 96 is presented for Group 1 and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with evidence of viral drug resistance-associated substitutions from week 0 to week 48 for Group 1 and Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented earlier in the record.

Time frame:
Week 96
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Viral Drug Resistance-associated Substitutions at Week 960.00.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on PI-containing regimens (including PI- and InSTI-containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol-12.94 (-23.94 to -1.94)6.20 (-2.16 to 14.56)
Fasting HDL-0.97 (-5.94 to 4.00)0.76 (-1.80 to 3.32)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol-7.47 (-15.86 to 0.92)5.93 (-1.08 to 12.93)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol-11.97 (-21.83 to -2.10)5.44 (-2.29 to 13.16)
Fasting Triglycerides-22.69 (-42.92 to -2.46)-3.16 (-19.81 to 13.49)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -19.75 · 95% CI -33.07 to -6.44Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -1.35 · 95% CI -6.55 to 3.84Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -13.94 · 95% CI -24.69 to -3.20Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -17.74 · 95% CI -30.02 to -5.46Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -21.28 · 95% CI -45.51 to 2.96Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on InSTI-based regimens (non-PI containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol2.98 (-2.19 to 8.14)8.74 (4.25 to 13.23)
Fasting HDL Cholesterol0.84 (-1.11 to 2.79)0.27 (-1.06 to 1.60)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol3.21 (-1.49 to 7.92)8.50 (4.27 to 12.73)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol2.14 (-3.39 to 7.67)8.47 (4.05 to 12.90)
Fasting Triglycerides-0.97 (-17.98 to 16.04)-1.56 (-10.80 to 7.69)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -4.17 · 95% CI -10.43 to 2.09Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.81 · 95% CI -1.46 to 3.09Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -3.87 · 95% CI -9.47 to 1.74Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -4.92 · 95% CI -11.21 to 1.38Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 1.65 · 95% CI -16.14 to 19.43Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 24. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on all other non-PI- and non-InSTI containing regimens, excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 24 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol7.18 (-0.49 to 14.85)7.35 (2.44 to 12.25)
Fasting HDL Cholesterol-3.43 (-6.51 to -0.36)-0.72 (-3.02 to 1.58)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol11.33 (5.75 to 16.92)7.19 (3.35 to 11.04)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol11.07 (4.40 to 17.74)8.07 (4.10 to 12.04)
Fasting Triglycerides-1.16 (-14.27 to 11.95)4.45 (-3.89 to 12.80)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 1.05 · 95% CI -7.60 to 9.70Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -3.16 · 95% CI -6.37 to 0.05Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 4.38 · 95% CI -2.27 to 11.03Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 3.63 · 95% CI -3.93 to 11.19Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -1.79 · 95% CI -15.89 to 12.31Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on PI-containing regimens (including PI- and InSTI-containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on Protease Inhibitor (PI)-Containing Regimens (Including PI- and Integrase Strand Transferase Inhibitor [InSTI]-Containing Regimens)
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol-15.31 (-28.99 to -1.64)1.84 (-5.70 to 9.38)
Fasting HDL Cholesterol-1.45 (-6.01 to 3.11)-1.08 (-3.91 to 1.75)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol-8.59 (-19.72 to 2.54)3.37 (-3.30 to 10.04)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol-13.86 (-25.28 to -2.45)2.81 (-4.40 to 10.01)
Fasting Triglycerides-26.90 (-42.31 to -11.48)2.28 (-16.39 to 20.95)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -18.41 · 95% CI -32.05 to -4.76Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -5.06 to 5.08Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -14.12 · 95% CI -25.81 to -2.43Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -18.23 · 95% CI -30.45 to -6.00Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -27.79 · 95% CI -51.08 to -4.49Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0094 (The significance level in ANCOVA model was 0.02497/2=0.012485. The p-value is statistically significant if it is \<0.02497/2=0.012485.) · Mean difference (net): -14.12 · 95% CI -27.56 to -0.68
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0021 (The significance level in ANCOVA model was 0.02497/2=0.012485. The p-value is statistically significant if it is \<0.02497/2=0.012485.) · Mean difference (net): -18.23 · 95% CI -32.28 to -4.17
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on InSTI-based regimens (non-PI containing regimens), excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI Containing Regimens)
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol2.23 (-2.70 to 7.17)4.39 (-0.19 to 8.96)
Fasting HDL Cholesterol0.23 (-1.61 to 2.08)0.13 (-1.24 to 1.51)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol2.74 (-1.27 to 6.76)3.44 (-0.88 to 7.76)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol2.00 (-3.16 to 7.16)4.37 (-0.24 to 8.98)
Fasting Triglycerides-2.29 (-15.02 to 10.44)4.44 (-5.60 to 14.48)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -6.26 to 6.18Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.35 · 95% CI -1.84 to 2.54Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.64 · 95% CI -4.83 to 6.11Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -0.49 · 95% CI -6.81 to 5.83Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -5.45 · 95% CI -20.46 to 9.57Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4093 (The significance level in ANCOVA model was 0.02497/2=0.012485. The p-value is statistically significant if it is \<0.02497/2=0.012485.) · Mean difference (net): 0.64 · 95% CI -5.63 to 6.90
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4397 (The significance level in ANCOVA model was 0.02497/2=0.012485. The p-value is statistically significant if it is \<0.02497/2=0.012485.) · Mean difference (net): -0.49 · 95% CI -7.72 to 6.75
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens

Blood serum samples were taken at baseline and Week 48. Per protocol, this outcome analysis was conducted in participants on all other non-PI- and non-InSTI containing regimens, excluding participants who took lipid-lowering therapy during the study. The fasting lipids consisted of fasting cholesterol, fasting HDL cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, fasting non-HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides. The mean change from baseline to Week 48 in fasting lipids is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fasting Lipids in Participants on All Other Non-PI- and Non-InSTI Containing Regimens
mg/dLGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fasting Cholesterol5.66 (-1.38 to 12.70)4.62 (0.10 to 9.15)
Fasting HDL Cholesterol-3.84 (-6.72 to -0.97)-1.98 (-4.60 to 0.63)
Fasting LDL Cholesterol9.27 (4.05 to 14.49)7.30 (3.97 to 10.63)
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol9.94 (4.16 to 15.73)6.61 (3.13 to 10.08)
Fasting Triglycerides3.33 (-9.54 to 16.21)-2.97 (-12.37 to 6.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 2.31 · 95% CI -5.54 to 10.17Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: -2.52 · 95% CI -5.69 to 0.65Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 2.34 · 95% CI -3.73 to 8.42Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 3.97 · 95% CI -2.63 to 10.56Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 10.50 · 95% CI -3.97 to 24.96Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48 for InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI-containing Regimens)

Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The change from baseline in body weight to Week 48 is presented for participants who received InSTI- based regimens.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48 for InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI-containing Regimens)
kgGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48 for InSTI-based Regimens (Non-PI-containing Regimens)0.66 (-0.17 to 1.48)0.10 (-0.56 to 0.75)
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) vs Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) · Estimated difference: 0.44 · 95% CI -0.59 to 1.46Difference in percentage versus (vs) Baseline ART was based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method
SecondaryGroup 1: Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs up to Week 96

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants with one or more AEs for Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

Time frame:
Up to ~96 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 1: Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs up to Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1: Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs up to Week 9692.3—
SecondaryGroup 1: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 96

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants. Per protocol, the percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention for Group 2 participants is a separate outcome measure and is presented later in the record.

Time frame:
Up to ~96 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE up to Week 965.7—
SecondaryGroup 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs From Week 48 to Week 96

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE from Week 48 up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96.

Time frame:
Weeks 48-96 (up to ~48 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs From Week 48 to Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs From Week 48 to Week 9673.076.4
SecondaryGroup 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE From Week 48 to Week 96

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE from Week 48 up to Week 96 is reported for Group 1 participants and Group 2 participants who delayed switch over from baseline ART to DOR/ISL from Week 48 to Week 96.

Time frame:
Weeks 48-96 (up to ~48 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE From Week 48 to Week 96
Percentage of ParticipantsGroup 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Group 1 & Group 2 (Switch-Over): Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE From Week 48 to Week 963.72.5

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 49 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 0-480/336 (0%)16/336 (4.8%)85/336 (25.3%)
Group 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of Trial1/322 (0.3%)13/322 (4%)115/322 (35.7%)
Group 2: Baseline ART Weeks 0-481/336 (0.3%)15/336 (4.5%)52/336 (15.5%)
Group 2: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of Trial0/326 (0%)12/326 (3.7%)120/326 (36.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 59
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 0-48Group 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of TrialGroup 2: Baseline ART Weeks 0-48Group 2: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of Trial
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/3360/3220/3360/326
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/3361/3221/3360/326
MalariaInfections and infestations0/3361/3220/3360/326
Ligament ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3361/3220/3360/326
Troponin increasedInvestigations0/3361/3220/3360/326
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3361/3220/3360/326
Cervical spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3361/3220/3360/326
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/3361/3220/3360/326
Pancreatic carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3361/3220/3360/326
VIth nerve paralysisNervous system disorders0/3361/3220/3360/326
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 0-48Group 1: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of TrialGroup 2: Baseline ART Weeks 0-48Group 2: DOR/ISL Weeks 48-End of Trial
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations0/33665/3220/33644/326
COVID-19Infections and infestations18/33642/32215/33657/326
CD4 lymphocytes decreasedInvestigations2/33645/3220/33639/326
HeadacheNervous system disorders36/33612/32216/33614/326
Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications24/3364/3223/3368/326
OsteopeniaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders10/3362/32219/3367/326

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)Total
Mean45.5 ± 11.745.4 ± 11.745.5 ± 11.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)Total
Female123126249
Male213210423
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)Total
Hispanic or Latino6764131
Not Hispanic or Latino266270536
Unknown or Not Reported325
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native4812
Asian191938
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander022
Black or African American8891179
White210198408
More than one race131629
Unknown or Not Reported224
ART Regimen Stratification
ART Regimen Stratification(Participants)Group 1: Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL)Group 2: Baseline Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)Total
PI-containing regimens (including PI- and InSTI-containing regimens)464692
InSTI-based regimens (non-PI containing regimens)174174348
All other non-PI- and non-InSTI containing regimens116116232
08

Study locations

78 sites
  • Georgetown University Hospital ( Site 1018)
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Midway Immunology and Research ( Site 1030)
    Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982, United States
  • Orlando Immunology Center ( Site 1007)
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Bliss Healthcare Services ( Site 1025)
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Triple O Research Institute, P.A. ( Site 1026)
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
  • Chatham County Health Department ( Site 1043)
    Savannah, Georgia 31401, United States
  • Northstar Healthcare ( Site 1002)
    Chicago, Illinois 60657, United States
  • Kansas City CARE Health Center ( Site 1008)
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • ID Care ( Site 1023)
    Hillsborough, New Jersey 08844, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ( Site 1042)
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania ( Site 1038)
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Saint Hope Foundation, Inc. ( Site 1037)
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • North Texas ID Consultants, PA ( Site 1003)
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates P.A. ( Site 1022)
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • The Crofoot Research Center, Inc. ( Site 1005)
    Houston, Texas 77098, United States
  • Holdsworth House Medical Practice ( Site 2300)
    Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital- Infectious Diseases Unit ( Site 2309)
    Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Melbourne Sexual Health Centre ( Site 2305)
    Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital ( Site 2301)
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Southern Alberta HIV Clinic ( Site 1108)
    Calgary, Alberta T2R 0X7, Canada
  • Vancouver ID Research and Care Centre Society ( Site 1100)
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2C7, Canada
  • Hamilton Health Sciences ( Site 1103)
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • Maple Leaf Research ( Site 1112)
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1K2, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network ( Site 1105)
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada
  • Clinique de Medecine Urbaine du Quartier Latin ( Site 1104)
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4E9, Canada
  • Clinique Medicale L Actuel ( Site 1114)
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4P9, Canada
  • Hospital Dr. Hernan Henriquez Aravena ( Site 1305)
    Temuco, Araucania 4781151, Chile
  • Clinica Arauco Salud ( Site 1300)
    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan 7560994, Chile
  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica UC CICUC ( Site 1303)
    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan 8330034, Chile
  • Fundacion Valle del Lili ( Site 1201)
    Cali, Valle del Cauca Department 760032, Colombia
  • Hopital de la Croix-Rousse ( Site 2027)
    Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 69317, France
  • Hopital Francois Mitterrand ( Site 2019)
    Dijon, Cote-d'Or 21079, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux- Hopital Saint Andre ( Site 2015)
    Bordeaux, Gironde 33075, France
  • CHU de Toulouse - Hopital Purpan ( Site 2004)
    Toulouse, Haute-Garonne 31059, France
  • CHU Hotel Dieu Nantes ( Site 2020)
    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique 44093, France
  • CHU de Rouen ( Site 2005)
    Rouen, Seine-Maritime 76031, France
  • A.P.H. Paris, Hopital Saint Louis ( Site 2014)
    Paris, 75010, France
  • ASST Fatebenefratelli-Ospedale Sacco ( Site 2200)
    Milan, 20157, Italy
  • A.O.U. Universita degli Studi della Campania-Luigi Vanvitelli ( Site 2208)
    Naples, 80131, Italy
  • Policlinico Gemelli Instituto di Clinica Chirurgica ( Site 2206)
    Roma, 00168, Italy
  • National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center ( Site 2403)
    Nagoya, Aichi-ken 460-0001, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital ( Site 2402)
    Osaka, 540-0006, Japan
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital ( Site 2406)
    Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital ( Site 2404)
    Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
  • Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine ( Site 2401)
    Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
  • Christchurch Hospital ( Site 2303)
    Christchurch, Canterbury 8011, New Zealand
  • EMC Instytut Medyczny SA Przychodnia przy ul. Lowieckiej we Wroclawiu ( Site 1500)
    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship 50-220, Poland
  • SP ZOZ Wojewodzki Szpital Zakazny ( Site 1505)
    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship 01-201, Poland
  • Wroclawskie Centrum Zdrowia SP ZOZ ( Site 1507)
    Wroclaw, 50-136, Poland
  • Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. dr. Wladyslawa Bieganskiego ( Site 1503)
    Lodz-Baluty, Łódź Voivodeship 91-347, Poland
  • Kemerovo Regional Center for the Prevention and Control of AIDS ( Site 1713)
    Kemerovo, Kemerovo Oblast 650056, Russia
  • Krasnoyarsk Regional Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS ( Site 1712)
    Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai 660049, Russia
  • Saint Petersburg Center for Prophylactic of AIDS and Inf. Diseases ( Site 1701)
    Saint Petersburg, Leningradskaya Oblast' 190020, Russia
  • Federal Scientific Methodological AIDS Prevention and Control Center ( Site 1703)
    Moscow, Moscow 105275, Russia
  • Infectious Clinical Hospital #2 ( Site 1719)
    Moscow, Moscow 105275, Russia
  • FGU Republican Clinical Infectious Hospital of Roszdrav ( Site 1700)
    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg 196645, Russia
  • Regional Center for Prevent. and Control of AIDS and Inf. Diseases ( Site 1715)
    Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast 620102, Russia
  • Republican Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases n. a. A.F.Agafonov ( Site 1707)
    Kazan', Tatarstan, Respublika 420140, Russia
  • JOSHA Research ( Site 1406)
    Bloemfontein, Free State 9301, South Africa
  • Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation Clinical Trial Unit ( Site 1414)
    Cape Town, Western Cape 7925, South Africa
  • Hospital General de Elche ( Site 1608)
    Elche, Alicante 03202, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol ( Site 1606)
    Badalona, Barcelona [Barcelona] 08916, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial ( Site 1600)
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon ( Site 1603)
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor ( Site 1601)
    Madrid, 28031, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz ( Site 1602)
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz ( Site 1604)
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Universitaetsspital Basel ( Site 3302)
    Basel, Canton of Basel-City 4031, Switzerland
  • Inselspital Universitaetsspital Bern ( Site 3303)
    Bern, Canton of Bern 3010, Switzerland
  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve HUG. ( Site 3304)
    Geneva, Canton of Geneva 1211, Switzerland
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen ( Site 3301)
    Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen 9007, Switzerland
  • Universitaetsspital Zuerich ( Site 3300)
    Zurich, Canton of Zurich 8091, Switzerland
  • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano Civico ( Site 3305)
    Lugano, Canton Ticino 6903, Switzerland
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust ( Site 1908)
    Brighton, Brighton And Hove BN2 1ES, United Kingdom
  • Southmead Hospital ( Site 1910)
    Bristol, Bristol, City of BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
  • Royal Free Hospital ( Site 1904)
    London, Camden NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
  • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust ( Site 1907)
    London, London, City of SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • North Manchester General Hospital ( Site 1902)
    Manchester, M8 5RB, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Molina JM, Rizzardini G, Orrell C, Afani A, Calmy A, Oka S, Hinestrosa F, Kumar P, Tebas P, Walmsley S, Grandhi A, Klopfer S, Gendrano I, Eves K, Correll TA, Fox MC, Kim J. Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0.75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2024 Jun;11(6):e369-e379. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00031-6. Epub 2024 May 8. PubMed 38734015 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 26, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04223778
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 10, 2020
Start date
Feb 18, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2021
Completion
Aug 26, 2024
Results posted
Sep 19, 2022
Last update
Feb 18, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion