CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04219891Updated Apr 6, 2025Results posted

WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap

An interventional study of WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system with InnovEyes sightmap and LASIK in Myopia, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-06.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system for the correction of myopia with and without astigmatism using InnovEyes in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap.

Read the detailed description

Qualified subjects will receive treatment in both eyes and be followed for 1 year. Subjects will be asked to attend a total of 9 visits (Screening, Day 0 Surgery, Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Year 1). The primary endpoints will be assessed at refractive stability, defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at 3 months after surgery when compared with the 1-month visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Total expected duration of subject participation is approximately 1 year. This study will be conducted in the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • LASIK
  • Ray Tracing
  • Myopia
  • Astigmatism
03

In context

Myopia

984 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 272 is above the median of 80 across 783 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.

Browse Myopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 109 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 99 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Myopia up to and including -11.00 D with or without astigmatism up to -4.50 D, with MRSE no more than -12.00 D
  • Best corrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
  • Uncorrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/40 or worse
  • Stable refraction (within ± 0.50 D) as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or evidence of active or inactive corneal disease or retinal vascular disease, keratoconus or glaucoma (or suspect)
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery
  • Intent to have monovision treatment

Other protocol-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system

    Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser with InnovEyes software in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap

    Device: WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system with InnovEyes sightmap · Procedure: LASIK · Device: InnovEyes sightmap

Interventions

  • DeviceWaveLight EX500 excimer laser system with InnovEyes sightmap

    FDA approved stationary scanning-spot excimer laser system used during refractive surgery for the treatment of myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism. For this clinical study, the WaveLight EX500 software will be upgraded to include the InnovEyes treatment.

  • ProcedureLASIK

    Procedure that reshapes the front part of the eye (cornea) so that light traveling through it is properly focused on the back part of the eye (retina). The procedure will be performed using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system and data obtained from the InnovEyes sightmap.

  • DeviceInnovEyes sightmap

    Non-contact ophthalmic diagnostic device that captures images of the eye and collects ocular data preoperatively to generate a patient-specific ablation profile for refractive correction surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters and reported in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Preoperatively, VA was assessed with correction in place. Postoperatively, VA was assessed with no correction in place. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3

  2. Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability

    A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive Stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3

  3. Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability

    A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3

  4. Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D

    A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3

  5. Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability

    VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3

  6. Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability

    VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place and measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution, where each line on the letter chart represents 0.1 Snellen and 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 Snellen, or normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3

  7. Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability

    Manifest refractive astigmatism is the cylindrical portion of the subjective refraction. It is measured with ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3

  8. Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability

    An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Up to Month 3

07

Results

Posted Apr 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from 9 investigative sites located in 1 country (US).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Started168
Successful surgery168
Safety analysis set (sas)168
Full analysis set (fas)167
Fas at refractive stability163
Completed163
Not completed5
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters and reported in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Preoperatively, VA was assessed with correction in place. Postoperatively, VA was assessed with no correction in place. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability100.0
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability

A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive Stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Month 1, Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability92.0
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability

A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Month 1, Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability98.5
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D

A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D99.4
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability

VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability0.0
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability

VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place and measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution, where each line on the letter chart represents 0.1 Snellen and 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 Snellen, or normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability0
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability

Manifest refractive astigmatism is the cylindrical portion of the subjective refraction. It is measured with ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability0.0
PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Up to Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability
percentage of eyesWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability0.0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent to study exit, up to approximately 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pretreatment0/168 (0%)0/168 (0%)3/168 (1.8%)
WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Ocular)0/336 (0%)4/336 (1.2%)0/336 (0%)
WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Systemic)0/168 (0%)0/168 (0%)10/168 (6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPretreatmentWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Ocular)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Systemic)
Retinal TearEye disorders0/1682/3360/168
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders0/1682/3360/168
Corneal opacityEye disorders0/1681/3360/168
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPretreatmentWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Ocular)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System (Systemic)
Corona virus infectionInfections and infestations3/1680/33610/168

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Mean33.3 ± 6.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Female105
Male62
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
White128
Black or African American10
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian16
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Multi-Racial2
Other9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
Hispanic or Latino23
Not Hispanic or Latino143
Not reported1
Unknown0
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    San Diego, California 92122, United States
  • Price Vision Group
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-7018, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68135, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Dallas, Texas 75243, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 9, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 30, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04219891
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 7, 2020
Start date
Mar 9, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 9, 2022
Completion
Nov 9, 2022
Results posted
Apr 6, 2025
Last update
Apr 6, 2025

Study contacts

Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical
study director · Alcon Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion