An interventional study of Parasagittal oblique technique (Ultrasound) and Paramedian tranverse technique (Ultrasound) in Realtime Ultrasound, sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Lebanon. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-25.
Sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In this prospective randomized observational study, investigators aim to compare the efficacy and procedural outcomes of real-time ultrasound guided parasagittal oblique (RTU-PO) and real-time ultrasound guided paramedian transverse (RTU-PT) approaches in elderly patients undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Background: Since its first introduction in 1898 by Bier, Spinal anesthesia has been performed using the anatomical landmark guided approach. Despite being useful, the landmark technique doesn't take into account anatomical variations, spine abnormalities or age-related changes in the lumbar spine as seen in elderly, obese or pregnant patients and thus can lead to incorrect identification of a certain interspace. Neuraxial ultrasonography has been introduced as a technique to allow the operator to preview spinal anatomy, identify the midline, determine the interspace and guide the needle insertion site and trajectory. It was found to be a feasible and promising technique that can result in successful cerebrospinal fluid acquisition where other methods have failed. While pre-procedural Ultrasound has been used by many studies to identify the right epidural or subarachnoid spaces and have an idea about the angle of needle insertion, it remains a blind technique. Real-time ultrasound guided technique was found to improve the limitations of the pre-puncture ultrasound guided techniques by direct, real-time visualization of the needle trajectory. In spinal anesthesia, a midline approach has been the most common technique used for needle insertion. However, this approach is often technically difficult in the geriatric population because of poorly palpable surface landmarks, lumbar scoliosis, marked thoracic kyphosis, degenerative changes and inability to flex the lumbar spine in the sitting position. While the parasagittal oblique approach tends to provide a better sonographic window into the vertebral canal than the midline approach, it is still not evident whether it will lead to an easier paramedian needle insertion. In the literature, there are no studies directly comparing the paramedian transverse and parasagittal oblique approaches in the performance of real time ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia.
Specific Aim: The aim of this study is to find out the optimal approach to perform spinal anesthesia under real time ultrasound guidance in the elderly population. Thus, investigators will compare real time ultrasound-guided paramedian approach using parasagittal oblique view with real time ultrasound guided paramedian approach using the paramedian transverse median view. The aim is thus to adopt a real time ultrasound guided technique that will result in an easier access to the subarachnoid space in patients with difficult anatomy and results in better patient satisfaction and less discomfort.
Methodology and analysis: In a prospective randomized observational study, 84 patients scheduled for surgery amenable to spinal anesthesia, aged more than 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 3 will be assigned to receive spinal anesthesia to one of two treatment groups: real time ultrasound-guided parasagittal oblique technique (group RTU-PO) or Real time ultrasound-guided paramedian transverse technique (group RTU-T). Ultrasonography of the lumbar spine and Real time spinal blockade will be performed by the experienced anesthesiologist. Patients in both groups will have an ultrasound scan of the lumbar spine to measure the depth of the dura, to specify and guide the needle insertion site and trajectory. The primary outcome is the rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt under real time ultrasound guidance. Normally distributed data will be summarized as mean ± SD and nonnormally distributed data will be summarized as median [interquartile range].
Significance: Investigators believe that real time US-guided technique is a superior modality of performance of spinal anesthesia. However, investigators would like to evaluate which approach will be better for the acquisition of cerebrospinal fluid in elderly patients. Investigators think that this study would have an impact on current practice in term of introducing real time ultrasound guided technique into everyday practice and determining the best approach to perform a successful neuraxial block in a patient with a suspected difficult back.
American University of Beirut Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 152 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
In the RTU-PO group, the probe will be placed in a parasagittal plane to identify the articular processes then the sacrum will be identified. The probe will be moved cephalad in the parasagittal axis until the identification of the target lumbar interspaces L2-L3, L3-L4 or L4-L5. Once the appropriate lumbar interspace is identified, the probe will be tilted 45 degree towards the midline into a parasagittal oblique view. This provides a view of the paramedian interlaminar space. The ligamentum flavum and the dura form the posterior complex that can be often visualized as a single hyperechoic structure beneath which lies the hypoechoic intrathecal space. The needle will be inserted in plane from the caudal end of the ultrasound transducer with its tip directed towards the interlaminar space under real-time in-plane US guidance.
Device: Parasagittal oblique technique (Ultrasound)
In the RTU-T group, similar to the RTU-PO group, the transducer will be applied in the parasagittal plane, and after identification of the intervertebral level, the probe will be rotated 90 degrees into a transverse orientation and centered on the neuraxial midline in a way to align the beam with the interspinous and interlaminar space and thus to get a paramedian transverse interlaminar view. The needle will be inserted in plane from the lateral end of the ultrasound transducer with its tip directed towards the medial border of the articular process.
Device: Paramedian tranverse technique (Ultrasound)
the probe will be placed in a parasagittal plane to identify the articular processes then the sacrum will be identified. The probe will be moved cephalad in the parasagittal axis until the identification of the target lumbar interspaces L2-L3, L3-L4 or L4-L5. Once the appropriate lumbar interspace is identified, the probe will be tilted 45 degree towards the midline into a parasagittal oblique view. The needle will be inserted in plane from the caudal end of the ultrasound transducer with its tip directed towards the interlaminar space under real-time in-plane US guidance.
the transducer will be applied in the parasagittal plane, and after identification of the intervertebral level, the probe will be rotated 90 degrees into a transverse orientation and centered on the neuraxial midline in a way to align the beam with the interspinous and interlaminar space and thus to get a paramedian transverse interlaminar view. The needle will be inserted in plane from the lateral end of the ultrasound transducer with its tip directed towards the medial border of the articular process.
Incidence of successful Dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt
Successful needle insertion on the first attempt (Yes/No)
Time frame: At the begining of the procedure (during the needle insertion)
Incidence of success of spinal anesthesia
Success of spinal anesthesia (Yes/No)
Time frame: During the procedure
Time to identify posterior complex on ultrasound
Time to identify posterior complex on ultrasound (measured in seconds)
Time frame: During the procedure
Time to perform spinal anesthesia
Time to perform spinal anesthesia (measured in seconds)
Time frame: During the procedure
Procedural time
Procedural time (measured in minutes)
Time frame: During the procedure
Depth of the posterior complex
Depth of the posterior complex (measured in cm)
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of redirections
Number of redirections
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of needle passes
Number of needle passes
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of separate skin punctures
Number of separate skin punctures
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of spinal levels attempted
Number of spinal levels attempted
Time frame: During the procedure
Rate of satisfaction
Patient satisfaction (scale from 1 to 3: very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied)
Time frame: After the procedure
Rate of complications
Complications (Yes/No)
Time frame: During the procedure
Rate of complications, if present
Complications if present (Vascular puncture, Paresthesia, Conversion to GA 30 minutes after block, and Others)
Time frame: During the procedure
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
American University of Beirut Medical Center