An interventional study of BCA method for assessing environmental cleanliness in Nosocomial Infection, Infection Control and Multi-antibiotic Resistance, sponsored by Cumhuriyet University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-22.
Sponsored by Cumhuriyet University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Effective cleaning of surfaces in the hospital environment is an absolute necessity to reduce pathogen transmission. Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) in ICU are among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections. Today, the growing prevalence of MDRO has made it more important than ever to clean contaminated surfaces with appropriate aseptic cleaning procedures, to protect patients and personnel. Despite the disinfection and sterilization methods, microorganisms that reach a sufficient concentration in the hospital environment survive for long periods and can cause serious transmission via contaminated hands of healthcare workers. In this context, surface cleaning and disinfection procedures in the hospital environment reduce cross-contamination of the health care units and disease-causing pathogens. Recently, environmental cleaning and disinfection have become important as well as the evaluation of cleanliness.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of BCA method, which is a new approach in evaluating the effectiveness of environmental cleanliness in intensive care units. fluoroscan gel marking, microbiological sampling and BCA assay methods will be compared to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of the BCA method. (PRO1 Micro Hygiene Monitoring System that System consisting of protein pen and device that analyzes with BCA method).
Patients admitted to the ICU are at great risk of developing nosocomial infections, partly because of their serious illness and partly because of exposure to life-saving invasive procedures. In ICU, implementation of invasive procedures, with the purpose of diagnosis and treatment, such as urinary catheter, central-peripheral catheter, intubation, and being subject to intensive antibiotic use increase the likelihood of infection. Environmental cleanliness is important for preventing infections.
Effective cleaning of surfaces in the hospital environment is an absolute necessity to reduce pathogen transmission. Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) in ICU are among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections. Today, the growing prevalence of MDRO has made it more important than ever to clean contaminated surfaces with appropriate aseptic cleaning procedures, to protect patients and personnel. Despite the disinfection and sterilization methods, microorganisms that reach a sufficient concentration in the hospital environment survive for long periods and can cause serious transmission via contaminated hands of healthcare workers. In this context, surface cleaning and disinfection procedures in the hospital environment reduce cross-contamination of the health care units and disease-causing pathogens. Recently, environmental cleaning and disinfection have become important as well as the evaluation of cleanliness.
Cleaning of frequently contacted environmental surfaces, monitoring and verifying the cleaning results are important for patient safety. The effectiveness of environmental cleaning can be assay by different methods. Visual evaluation, ATP (AdenosineTriphosphate) measurement, protein tests and fluoroscan marking methods are some of them.
Evaluation of the patient unit cleanup in the ICU, that is carried out after the discharge of patients with infection or colonization that would require strict contact isolation, by Fluoroscan Marking, BCA and Microbiological Sampling methods, is planned with the aim of collecting data in order to prove the efficiency and clinical employability of the new cleaning assessment method, PRO1 Micro Hygiene Monitoring System (System consisting of protein pen and device that analyzes with BCA method).
6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.
Browse Infections studies →Cumhuriyet University is the lead sponsor of 128 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
A patient infected with resistant microorganism in the unit is in the same unit for at least 72 hours
The first BCA measurement when the unit is discharged gives a result indicating the unit is dirty.-
Exclusion Criteria:
In this study, 1. fluorescent marking, 2. microbiological sampling and 3. BCA methods will be compared in order to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of BCA method
Other: BCA method for assessing environmental cleanliness
Evaluating the effectiveness and usability of BCA method which is a new approach in evaluating the effectiveness of environmental cleanliness in intensive care units. In this study, fluorecan labeling, microbiological sampling and BCA methods will be compared in order to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of BCA method
Also known as: Pro 1 Micro Hygiene Monitoring Systems
To evaluate the effectiveness of cleaning
The absence of gel residue on the surfaces indicates that the wiping process is effective. Microbiological samples will determine the presence and amount of bacteria (colony) in the environment. It is aimed that bacteria cannot be produced in the samples taken from the environment after cleaning. The BCA protein samples will be analyzed by the researcher using the PRO 1 Micro hygiene monitoring device. PRO 1 Micro hygiene monitoring device will detect the presence of biological material on the surfaces. The presence and amount of bacteria on the surface will be determined with BCA protein. The presence and amount of bacteria can be detected by BCA protein swab, but not by bacterial species. The device is capable of detecting the biological load between 1 - 10 micrograms. Areas with values above 5 micrograms will be considered as dirty, areas with values below 5 micrograms will be considered as clean
Time frame: 1 year
To evaluate the effectiveness of BCA method
If cleaning is not considered to be effective, cleaning will be repeated. If the results of samples taken with BCA protein pen after effective cleaning are below 5 microns, it is concluded that the area, is clean. If the BCA method (micrograms) shows clean or similar results in microbiological samples (colony), it will be concluded that the BCA method can be used to evaluate surface cleanliness.
Time frame: 1 year
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cumhuriyet University