ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04206475Updated Feb 6, 2020

Feasibility Randomized Trial for an Intensive Memory-Focused Training Program for School Aged Children With Acquired br.Inj.

An interventional study of rehabilitation and Intensive Memory-Focused Training Program (IM-FTP) in Acquired Brain Injury, sponsored by IRCCS Eugenio Medea. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-06.

Sponsored by IRCCS Eugenio Medea · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2013, registered Dec 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Memory deficits are common sequelae of pediatric Acquired Brain Injury (ABI). Only methods for non-focused cognitive remediation are available to the pediatric field. The aims of this feasibility trial are the description, implementation, and test of an intensive program specific to the training and re-adaptation of memory function in children (IM-FTP). Method: Eleven children and adolescents with ABI (mean age at injury=12.2 years, brain tumor survivors excluded) were clinically assessed and rehabilitated over 1-month through IM-FTP, including physio-kinesis/occupational, speech, and neuropsychology treatments. Each patient received a psychometric evaluation and a brain functional MRI at enrollment and at discharge. Ten pediatric controls with ABI (mean age at injury=13.8 years) were clinically assessed, and rehabilitated through a standard program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acquired Brain Injury

Browse trials for

03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,125 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 384 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 48 across 1,341 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Eugenio Medea is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • i) age at first assessment between 6 and 18 years;
  • ii) time between injury and first assessment \<3 months;
  • iii) documented evidence of a severe ABI of traumatic or non-traumatic (i.e. anoxic, vascular or infectious) etiology, as indicated by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS, [26]), score ≤8 at insult;
  • iv) presence of severe memory impairment, as assessed at first evaluation;
  • v) sufficient attentive skills for attending a simple task and understanding simple commands/directions, and sufficient verbal comprehension for executing simple procedures/exercises;
  • vi) absence of congenital pathology or disability previous to the injury;
  • vii) medical records sufficiently detailed to determine the injury severity and neurological findings;
  • viii) absence of severe motor or sensitive deficits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IM-FTP

    rehabilitated over 1-month through IM-FTP, including physio-kinesis/occupational, speech, and neuropsychology treatments

    Other: rehabilitation · Other: Intensive Memory-Focused Training Program (IM-FTP)

  • Active comparator
    standard rehabilitation

    physio-kinesis, occupational, speech, and neuropsychology treatments

    Other: rehabilitation

Interventions

  • Otherrehabilitation

    the rehabilitation program consisted of an intensive treatment lasting 4 weeks, and including 3 daily interventions each working day (5 working days per week, for a total of 20 days of treatment and 60 sessions). The 3 daily sessions were organized as follows: 1 physio-kinesis and/or occupational therapy, 1 speech therapy, and 1 neuro-psychology treatment. Each session lasted 45 minutes.

  • OtherIntensive Memory-Focused Training Program (IM-FTP)

    During each session, the patient was engaged in a one-to-one interaction with the therapist. Overall, the treatment targeted the following memory subfunctions: verbal and visuo-spatial short-term memory, verbal and visuo-spatial long-term memory, working memory and procedural memory

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Psychometric evaluation

    At both time points, the patients were administered the Rey- Osterrieth complex figure test (REY), the test for immediate and delayed memory of a list of words of the Italian 'Batteria di Valutazione Neuropsicologica' (BVN) battery (BVNLi and BVNLd, respectively), the test for immediate and delayed recall in prose memory of the Italian BVN battery (BVNPi and BVNPd), the test for immediate and delayed recall in positional memory supra-span (SUPRASPANi and SUPRASPANd), and the Italian TEMA test for the learning of couples of related and unrelated words (TEMA)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • IRCCS E. Medea
    Bosisio Parini, Lecco 23842, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2013 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 51 months.

Of 566 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Brain Injuries, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 52. This study's 51 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 599 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2019
First posted
Dec 20, 2019
StartActual
Oct 21, 2013
Primary completionActual
Feb 3, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 3, 2018
Last update
Feb 6, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04206475
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2019
Start date
Oct 21, 2013
Primary completion
Feb 3, 2018
Completion
Feb 3, 2018
Last update
Feb 6, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion