CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04202445MIKADOUpdated Jun 9, 2023

TreatMent of ActInic KerAtosis Lesions : pharmacoepiDemiological Study of the Impact in Real Life of ingenOl Mebutate Gel (Picato®) on Patients Satisfaction

An observational study in Actinic Keratosis, sponsored by LEO Pharma. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-09.

Sponsored by LEO Pharma · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,218
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational longitudinal study, prospective, multicenter, performed in metropolitan France, on a representative sample of dermatologists.

Data will be collected by physicians during 2 or 3 visits (according to their usual practice), from the patient file, questioning and clinical examination performed during these visits.

Data about the patient's perception (satisfaction, perception of local skin reactions, quality of life) will be collected directly by the patient using self-administered questionnaires at inclusion visit, day 7 and 2 months later.

Read the detailed description

Actinic keratosis (AKs) are common skin diseases affecting areas previously overexposed to the sun (in particular face, nape of the neck, hands). They affect mainly elderly people (mean age: 74 years old, with 97% who are over 50 years old) and preferably men (60%). In Europe, prevalence of AK in the adult population over 40 years is estimated to be between 6% and 25%.

Subjects at risk are light-skinned people (phototype I and II according to Fitzpatrick scale) with high cumulative sun exposure or phototherapy. Over 80% of patients have a light phototype and 37% of patients with AK have an outside professional activity.

Diagnosis of AK is usually clinical, during skin examination which is recommended for any physician's visit. There are often multiple lesions, some of which, in the absence of effective treatment, can progress to squamous cell carcinoma (0.025% to 20% per year/lesion).

Although the evolution rate of AKs to carcinoma remains low and disappearance or sole persistence of the lesion is possible, their evolution is unpredictable, and it is therefore recommended to monitor and treat the AKs.

Treatment options include cryotherapy, topical treatments, photodynamic therapy, vaporization of lesions by CO2 laser or electrocoagulation and curretage.

When there are few AK lesions, which are localized and with superficial forms, cryotherapy is the reference treatment (it is widely used by dermatologists, as it is simple, fast and does not require special equipment), whereas topical treatment (5-FU, imiquimod, diclofenac) is recommended in case of multiple keratosis or lesions on a larger area of the skin. The disadvantage of cryotherapy and photodynamic therapy is that these techniques can be painful and lead to depigmentation or scarring. Topical treatments which are available (imiquimod, 5-FU, diclofenac) may induce severe inflammatory reactions sometimes responsible for premature termination and thus ineffective.

Combined with their length (4 to 16 weeks), the complexity of current topical regimens would be the cause of poor compliance.

So, all dermatologists agree with the need to shorten duration of treatment and reduce the number of applications. Ingenol mebutate gel (Picato®), used in very short 2-3 days cycle, with one application per day, meets this need.

Development of ingenol mebutate gel included 4 pivotal phase III trials, evaluating its efficacy and safety. The results of these studies have established satisfactory efficacy and safety for Picato® with, on one hand, proven efficacy after two months for face, scalp, trunk and extremities and, on the other hand, transient local skin reactions (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting,swelling,...), which appear early, peak in intensity after the end of treatment (day 3 or day 4) and disappear without sequelae within 2-4 weeks after application of the gel. At day 57, mean patient global satisfaction scores, either assessed with TSQM or Skindex-16, were statistically higher in the ingenol mebutate gel group than in the vehicle group. In a long term follow up study, ingenol mebutate produced clinically relevant sustained clearance and long-term lesion reduction.

These characteristics are a potentially important advantage for treatment compliance as well as for patient comfort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Actinic Keratosis

Keywords

  • Actinic keratosis
  • Field treatment
  • Ingenol mebutate
  • Picato
  • Mikado
03

In context

Keratosis, Actinic

364 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratosis, Actinic; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,218 is above the median of 179 across 35 observational studies indexed under Keratosis, Actinic.

Browse Keratosis, Actinic studies →

Lead sponsor

LEO Pharma is the lead sponsor of 221 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients diagnosed with actinic keratosis planned to receive treatment with ingenol mebutate at the discretion of the dermatologist

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient at least 18 years old, seen by the dermatologist during a consultation, whether actinic keratosis is the reason for consultation or not.
  • Patient with AK lesions and for whom the dermatologist decided to initiate a treatment with Picato®* 150 or Picato®* 500
  • Patient informed and accepting the automatic processing of medical data * To respect the physicians' independence, this study is conducted among patients for whom the decision of therapeutic care is not related to their inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a contraindication to treatment with Picato®.
  • Patient unable to read and/or to understand a self-administered questionnaire.
  • Patient already included in the study.
  • Patient participating or having participated in the previous month in a clinical trial in dermatology.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,218 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DrugIngenol mebutate

    Topical field treatment as prescribed by dermatologist

    Also known as: Picato

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire of Medication (TSQM-9)

    The TSQM-9 scale is a 7-item instrument to be completed by patients. The TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domaine.

    Time frame: 2 months after end of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dermatology Life Quality Index - DLQI

    Dermatology Life Quality Index is an index based on a series of 10 questions, each scored on a verbal rating scale with 2 to 4 answer categories, and except for three questions the option to state that the question is not relevant. The DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. A score higher than 10 indicates that the patient's life is being severely affected by their skin disease.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 months after end of treatment

  2. Real-life efficacy of Picato

    Efficacy assessed using the following scale filled out by the physician: - How do you assess the treatment efficacy : 1-Excellent / 2-Good / 3-Mild / 4-Bad / 5-NA

    Time frame: Between Day 1 after the treatment application and 12 months (maximum 2 follow-up visits after the inclusion)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Frost CA, Green AC. Epidemiology of solar keratoses. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Oct;131(4):455-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08544.x. PubMed 7947197 ↗
  • Memon AA, Tomenson JA, Bothwell J, Friedmann PS. Prevalence of solar damage and actinic keratosis in a Merseyside population. Br J Dermatol. 2000 Jun;142(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03541.x. PubMed 10848739 ↗
  • Quaedvlieg PJ, Tirsi E, Thissen MR, Krekels GA. Actinic keratosis: how to differentiate the good from the bad ones? Eur J Dermatol. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):335-9. PubMed 16935787 ↗
  • Dinehart SM. The treatment of actinic keratoses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Jan;42(1 Pt 2):25-8. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103338. PubMed 10607354 ↗
  • French Society of Dermatology. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions. Arguments - May 2009]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Sep;136 Suppl 5:S189-242. No abstract available. French. PubMed 19795558 ↗
  • Thai KE, Fergin P, Freeman M, Vinciullo C, Francis D, Spelman L, Murrell D, Anderson C, Weightman W, Reid C, Watson A, Foley P. A prospective study of the use of cryosurgery for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol. 2004 Sep;43(9):687-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02056.x. PubMed 15357755 ↗
  • Burge SM, Bristol M, Millard PR, Dawber RP. Pigment changes in human skin after cryotherapy. Cryobiology. 1986 Oct;23(5):422-32. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(86)90027-1. PubMed 3769517 ↗
  • Zouboulis CC. Cryosurgery in dermatology. Eur J Dermatol. 1998 Oct-Nov;8(7):466-74. PubMed 9854156 ↗
  • Fu W, Cockerell CJ. The actinic (solar) keratosis: a 21st-century perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Jan;139(1):66-70. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.1.66. No abstract available. PubMed 12533168 ↗
  • Lebwohl M, Swanson N, Anderson LL, Melgaard A, Xu Z, Berman B. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1010-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111170. PubMed 22417254 ↗
  • Anderson L, Schmieder GJ, Werschler WP, Tschen EH, Ling MR, Stough DB, Katsamas J. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Jun;60(6):934-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.008. PubMed 19467365 ↗
  • Berman B. New developments in the treatment of actinic keratosis: focus on ingenol mebutate gel. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:111-22. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S28905. Epub 2012 Aug 24. PubMed 22956883 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04202445
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2019
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Jun 9, 2023

Study contacts

Sarah Moumane, MD
study chair · LEO Pharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion