ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04194996PCD 2Updated Feb 17, 2026

Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cervical Deformity: A Multi-Center Study 2.0

An observational study in Cervical Deformity, sponsored by International Spine Study Group Foundation. Recruiting at 16 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by International Spine Study Group Foundation · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2019; still recruiting 7 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated patients with adult cervical spinal deformity.

Read the detailed description

Adult cervical deformity (ACD) is an uncommon but potentially severely debilitating condition with a broad range of causes that include but are not limited to spondylosis, inflammatory arthropathy, trauma, infection, iatrogenic, neoplastic, congenital, and neuromuscular processes. In general, sagittal plane deformities typically produce kyphosis, and coronal plane deformities result in scoliosis. Cervical kyphotic deformities are most commonly encountered in the setting of prior surgical destabilization, while cervical scoliosis is most commonly associated with congenital and neuromuscular conditions.

Cervical kyphosis may be progressive and can result in neurological symptoms, including myelopathy. The most severe forms, such as those associated with spondylotic arthropathies, can produce "chin-on-chest" deformity, which can compromise horizontal gaze, swallowing, and breathing. Even in the absence of these conditions, cervical deformity is often associated with pain and functional disability. For adult thoracolumbar deformities, substantial efforts have been made to characterize clinical presentations, develop standardized classification systems, define optimal treatment approaches, describes operative complication rates, and to present structured clinical outcomes. However, despite the potential for profound impact of cervical deformity on function and health-related quality of life, there remains a remarkable paucity of high-quality studies that address these complex conditions.

Health professionals providing nonoperative and surgical care for these patients are left to make important treatment decisions based on a combination of personal experience, anecdotal experience of colleagues and experts, and relatively small, often single-surgeon or single-center, retrospective case reports or case series in the literature. Recent systematic reviews have high-lighted the lack of studies relevant to cervical deformity and have failed to identify any prospective studies.

The International Spine Study Group (ISSG) consists of orthopedic and neurological spine surgeons with a practice emphasis on spinal deformity patients. These surgeons, from 12 busy surgical centers, meet regularly to design and perform clinical research focused on spinal deformity, including successful prospective enrollment of more than 1,000 adult thoracolumbar deformity patients into the ISSG database. This group has a proven track record and regularly presents a substantial number of abstracts to the major spine meetings and has an extensive publication record.

The ISSG members have currently enrolled more than 150 patients into the first generation prospective cervical deformity database and have produced approximately 50 abstracts and more than 25 manuscripts to date with the resulting data. The group has learned extensively from this first-generation database, but there is much yet to learn, as the literature remains relatively sparse on the topic of adult cervical deformity. Based on what we have learned from the first generation database; we have substantially modified the inclusion criteria for this second generation database. In addition, several new outcomes measures and functional assessments will be collected at baseline and follow-up intervals as part of this current proposal.

The resources of the ISSG offer an unprecedented opportunity to create a prospectively collected multicenter database of cervical deformity patients that includes standardized health-related quality of life measures at baseline and regular follow-up, clinical and surgical parameters, and complications. The database and questionnaires have been carefully redesigned based on what we have learned in order to better collect data that will help to clarify many of the unresolved issues that are important for the care of cervical deformity patients. This project has substantial potential to significantly impact the field of cervical deformity and the care of deformity patients beyond what we have already been able to accomplish based on the first generation cervical deformity database. Herein we propose the second iteration for this project that promises to further advance our evolving understanding of these complex deformities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Deformity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cervical deformity
  • Kyphosis
  • Scoliosis
03

In context

Kyphosis

132 studies on the registry are indexed under Kyphosis; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 62 across 45 observational studies indexed under Kyphosis.

Browse Kyphosis studies →

Lead sponsor

International Spine Study Group Foundation is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Spine Surgeon Clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years old at time of treatment
  • Diagnosis of cervical deformity- must meet one or more of the following criteria:

    • C2-C7 sagittal kyphosis (Cobb > 15 degrees)
    • T1S-CL > 35o
    • Segmental cervical kyphosis > 10 degrees between any 2 vertebra between C2-T1 or > 15 degrees across any 3 vertebra between C2-T1
    • Cervical scoliosis > 10 degrees (Cobb angle must include end vertebra within the cervical spine)
    • C2-C7 SVA > 4cm
    • McGregor's slope > 20 degrees or CBVA > 25 degrees OR
    • Planned Revision surgery for proximal junctional failure with an anticipated UIV in the cervical spine and an anticipated LIV in the thoracic or lumbar spine.
  • Plan for surgical correction of cervical deformity in the next 6 months
  • Willing to provide consent and complete study forms at baseline and follow-up intervals
  • Upright AP/Lateral entire spine (EOS or 36")
  • Upright AP/Lateral C spine ONLY IF C spine is not completely visible on entire spine films
  • Flex/Ext lateral C spine. Admin may allow exceptions w/ valid documentation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active spine tumor or infection
  • Deformity due to acute trauma
  • Unwilling to provide consent or to complete study forms
  • Prisoner
  • Pregnant or immediate plans to get pregnant
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Operative

    Inclusion criteria: 1. ≥18 years old at time of treatment 2. Diagnosis of cervical deformity- must meet one or more of the following criteria: * C2-C7 sagittal kyphosis (Cobb \> 15o) * T1S-CL \> 35o * Segmental cervical kyphosis \> 10o between any 2 vertebra between C2-T1 or \> 15o across any 3 vertebra between C2-T1 * Cervical scoliosis \> 10o (Cobb angle must include end vertebra within the cervical spine) * C2-C7 SVA \> 4cm * McGregor's slope \> 20 degrees or CBVA \> 25 degrees 3. Plan for surgical correction of cervical deformity in the next 6 months

    Procedure: Surgical intervention

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical intervention

    Surgical interventions will be patient specified by treating surgeon.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Headaches

    Self-reported pain in Head where 0=no pain/10=severe pain

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  2. Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Neck

    Self-reported pain in Neck where 0=no pain/10=severe pain

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  3. Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Upper extremity

    Self-reported pain in Arms where 0=no pain/10=severe pain

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  4. Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Lower extremity

    Self-reported pain in Legs where 0=no pain/10=severe pain

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  5. Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Back

    Self-reported pain in Back where 0=no pain/10=severe pain

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  6. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Patient reported neck disability tool

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  7. Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)

    Patient reported outcome

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  8. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  9. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  10. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Pain Interference

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  11. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  12. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (Role)

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  13. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (DSA)

    Computer adaptive PROs

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  14. Spine Radiographs

    Radiographic parameters (Cervical lordosis, Kyphosis, Scoliosis; Global balance in coronal and sagittal planes of the spine; pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, tilt, slope) and bony fusion status.

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  15. Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA)

    Patient reported outcome measuring functional status using scale of 0 to 18. The higher the score, the less disability.

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. EAT-10

    Measures swallowing difficulties as reported by the patient.

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  2. Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)

    Measures voice handicap as reported by the patient.

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  3. Adverse evnts

    Any adverse events occurring \& meeting study established reporting criteria

    Time frame: 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year post treatment

  4. Edmonton Frail Scale

    Frailty scale from 0 to 17 where the higher the score the more frail the patient

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  5. CHSF Frail Scale

    Clinical Frailty Scale from 1 to 9 where the higher the score, the more frail the patient

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

  6. Dynamometer Hand Grip Strength test

    With patient seated, patient will squeeze dynamometer as hard as he/she can with each hand.

    Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

07

Study locations

13 of 16 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 100 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2019
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
StartActual
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2030
Last update
Feb 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04194996
Lead sponsor
International Spine Study Group Foundation
Collaborators
DePuy Synthes, Orthofix Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
Start date
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

Christine Baldus, MS
Contact
baldusc@wustl.edu
6184444130
Ray Pinteric
Contact
ray.pinteric@outlook.com
Justin Smith, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia, Department of Neurosurgery
Christopher Ames, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco, Department on Neurosurgery
Christopher I Shaffrey, MD
principal investigator · Duke University, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion