ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04192383Updated Jun 29, 2021

Evaluation of Effectiveness of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Tumors

An observational study in Spinal Neoplasms, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-29.

Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to explore the reliability of the combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics for evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal tumors. Accurate imaging assessment can help clinicians plan personalized therapeutic schedules for patients with spinal tumors .

Read the detailed description

Spinal tumors may be metastases or primary tumors; the former are more common. About 40% of cancer patients will have spinal metastasis. Primary spinal tumor is relatively rare, accounting for only about 8% of spinal tumors. For both metastasis and primary tumor, the aim of treatment is to reduce pain, maintain or improve neurological function, and maintain or restore spinal stability.

In patients who cannot undergo surgery or need additional treatment after surgery, radiation therapy can relieve pain, prolong survival, improve the success rate of surgery, and reduce risk of metastasis and recurrence. However, the complex anatomy of the spine, and the numerous important organs around it, makes radiation treatment challenging. High-dose radiation therapy is necessary for long-term control of the tumor and for prevention of spinal column instability; however, this is impossible with traditional radiotherapy due to the presence of the radiosensitive spinal cord. Outcomes therefore tend to be poor for large and complex lesions. The CyberKnife-a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) platform that combines a lightweight linear accelerator, a robotic arm, an imaging system, and a respiratory tracking system-offers a feasible approach. It can achieve submillimeter level-precision treatment under imaging guidance.

Currently, the effectiveness of CyberKnife radiosurgery for spinal tumors is decided by assessing imaging changes, relief of clinical symptoms, and needle biopsy, but all of these methods have limitations. On imaging, for example, change in lesion volume is used to assess tumor regression, but the size of a spinal tumor is not easy to measure and, moreover, decrease in tumor volume after treatment may take time . Post-treatment signal intensity changes in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences are difficult to interpret, and their relationship with treatment efficacy is also not clear.

Generally speaking, alterations in microscopic structure and biological activity of the tumor occur much earlier than changes in gross morphology . Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can therefore be more useful than conventional MRI for assessing treatment response. In fMRI, sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) reflect functional information of tissues from different perspectives.

Application of artificial intelligence technology for analysis of medical imaging data is now an area of intense research. This new method, which is called radiomics, can help in solving many difficult clinical problems. By extracting a large number of highly representative quantitative imaging features from high-throughput medical image data, radiomics can help in evaluating treatment efficacy and predicting prognosis of spinal tumors.

Investigators intend to explore the use of the combination of fMRI and radiomics for evaluating the effectiveness of CyberKnife radiosurgery for spinal tumors. The method will be able to evaluate both volume and functional changes in the tumor, and thus provide important information for planning of individualized therapeutic schedules for patients with spinal tumors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Neoplasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal Neoplasms
  • Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
  • CyberKnife Radiosurgery
  • Functional MRI
  • treatment outcome
03

In context

Spinal Neoplasms

18 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Neoplasms; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cohorts will be selected form Peking University Third Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • -proven spinal or paraspinal ;
  • MRI and DCE-MRI examination performed before and at 3 months after CyberKnife treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Area of the lesion surgically removed before enrollment;
  • Prior percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty or radiation therapy of the target lesion;
  • Chemotherapy within a month;
  • Unable to cooperate with-or refusal of-CT, conventional MRI, or DCE-MRI examination;
  • Lost to follow-up;
  • Poor image quality that cannot be analyzed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cyberknife

    Radiation: Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery

Interventions

  • RadiationCyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery

    Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival(OS)

    The time from the start of treatment to the date of death or last follow-up

    Time frame: From the start of randomization to the date of death of the patient or the end of the study (at 60 months).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival(PFS)

    The time from the start of treatment to the date of diagnosis of tumor progression or death. Tumor progression is defined as increase in lesion volume on MRI compared to baseline, or identification of new metastasis on imaging or histological examination.

    Time frame: From the start of randomization to the first evidence of tumor progression or death of the patient or the end of the study (at 60 months), whichever occurs first.

  2. Numerical rating scales (NRS)

    A 11 point scale where the end points are the extremes of no pain and pain as bad as it could be, or worst pain.

    Time frame: Measurements will be performed every 3 months, starting from randomization until the patient's death or till end of the study (at 60 months ).

  3. European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific, self-administered, structured questionnaire designed for use in clinical trials, which contains 30 questions (items),

    Time frame: Measurements will be performed every 3 months, starting from randomization until the patient's death or till end of the study (at 60 months ).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Yongye Chen
    Beijing, Beijing, China
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2021, 33 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2019
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
StartActual
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2021
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2022
Last update
Jun 29, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04192383
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2021
Completion
Jan 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion