ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04189354Updated Jul 19, 2022

Study of the Synergistic Effects of Biofeedback and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Anxio-depressive Disorders

An interventional study of Transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) device in Anxiety Depression, sponsored by Tatiana Besse-Hammer. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-19.

Sponsored by Tatiana Besse-Hammer · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anxio-depressive disorders are characterized by a difficulty in regulating the negative or aversive emotions adequately. These dysfunctions have been linked to a deficit in prefrontal cortex activity. The latter has an inhibitory influence on limbic regions -especially the amygdala- involved in the generation of emotions. By this means, the prefrontal cortex intervenes in the control of the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system whp are responsible for the physiological components of the emotion, including the variations of the cardiac rhythm (HRV: heart rate variability).

In emotionally demanding situations, the activity of the prefrontal cortex is generally associated with an increase in parasympathetic activity that is exerted by stimulation of the vagus nerve. In patients with anxio-depressive disorder, there is a decrease in the activity of the autonomic nervous system whose variability in heart rate is a recognized marker.

Many studies show a beneficial impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) on anxio-depressive symptoms, particularly when a particular area is targeted: the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. The impacts of this intervention are multiple and aim in particular to modulate the activity of the autonomic nervous system to promote regulation.

Biofeedback HRV is a technique that allows you to learn how to modulate your heart rate by means of respiratory control exercises. The patient receives an immediate feedback on the effectiveness of his learning (basic principle of bio-feedback). This intervention will allow to act on the parasympathetic activity and to promote a vagal tone adequate to the emotional regulation. Numerous studies have demonstrated the favorable impact of HRV biofeedback on the reduction of anxious and depressive symptoms.

Since the vagus nerve seems to be a primary pathway in physiologically emotional regulation, and considering that vagal tone can be stimulated by both the activity of the prefrontal cortex and through respiratory control, it appears interesting to study the association of t-DCS with HRV biofeedback techniques.

The first objective of this study is to show that HRV biofeedback training coupled with t-DCS is associated with a greater decrease in anxious symptomatology. The secondary objective of the study is to show that a coupling of these two techniques is associated with an increase of the variability of the cardiac rhythm as well as a more important decrease of the depressive symptomatology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Depression

Browse trials for

03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Tatiana Besse-Hammer is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnose of anxio-depressive disorder
  • Good understanding of French
  • High anxiety level (STAI questionnaire score higher to 46) with reported difficulties to manage this anxiety.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol dependence (assessed by the AUDIT questionnaire)
  • Pregnancy
  • t-DCS contra indications : traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, known bipolar disease, electronic or metalic implant
  • Known cardiac arrhythmia or intake of beta-blockers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active t-DCS

    Use of the t-DCS machine with the following stimulation parameters: current intensity of 2mA, electrode size of 25 cm2, duration of stimulation 20 minutes (excluding the fade-in and fade-out periods of 15 seconds).

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) device

  • Sham comparator
    Sham t-DCS

    The condition of use in sham mode follows the same procedure as the active t-DCS except that the active stimulation lasts only 30 seconds at 3mA (60 seconds of active stimulation taking into account the periods of fade in and fade out). The stimulator remains switched on during the procedure but does not deliver current. The devices are fully automatic and deliver an active or sham current according to a randomized stimulation code whose meaning is unknown by the operator, in order to respect the triple blind.

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) device

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) device

    t-DCS is a brain electrostimulation technique that consists of applying a current of low intensity (between 1 and 2 mA) on the scalp via two electrodes, in order to modify the cerebral activity of the stimulated zones. The investigators use the Soterix Medical t-DCS devices of the mini-CT 1x1 type.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y) scores

    Questionnaire with 20 questions, each with 4 possible answers. Each answer corresponds to a score of 1 to 4, 1 indicating the lowest degree of anxiety and 4 the highest degree.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  2. State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y) scores

    Questionnaire with 20 questions, each with 4 possible answers. Each answer corresponds to a score of 1 to 4, 1 indicating the lowest degree of anxiety and 4 the highest degree.

    Time frame: Day 8

  3. State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y) scores

    Questionnaire with 20 questions, each with 4 possible answers. Each answer corresponds to a score of 1 to 4, 1 indicating the lowest degree of anxiety and 4 the highest degree.

    Time frame: Day 29

  4. State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y) scores

    Questionnaire with 20 questions, each with 4 possible answers. Each answer corresponds to a score of 1 to 4, 1 indicating the lowest degree of anxiety and 4 the highest degree.

    Time frame: One time point between day 60 and day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)

    The Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD) is one of a few time-domain tools used to assess heart rate variability, the successive differences being neighboring RR intervals.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  2. Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)

    The Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD) is one of a few time-domain tools used to assess heart rate variability, the successive differences being neighboring RR intervals.

    Time frame: Day 8

  3. Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)

    The Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD) is one of a few time-domain tools used to assess heart rate variability, the successive differences being neighboring RR intervals.

    Time frame: Day 29

  4. Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)

    The Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD) is one of a few time-domain tools used to assess heart rate variability, the successive differences being neighboring RR intervals.

    Time frame: One time point between day 60 and day 90

  5. High frequency in spectral analysis

    Spectral analysis of the RR interval is an indirect, noninvasive measurement tool of heart rate variability. High-frequency RR signal (greater than 0.15 Hz) is associated with increased parasympathetic tone, and low-frequency RR signal (0.04-0.15 Hz) is associated with increased sympathetic tone.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  6. High frequency in spectral analysis

    Spectral analysis of the RR interval is an indirect, noninvasive measurement tool of heart rate variability. High-frequency RR signal (greater than 0.15 Hz) is associated with increased parasympathetic tone, and low-frequency RR signal (0.04-0.15 Hz) is associated with increased sympathetic tone.

    Time frame: Day 8

  7. High frequency in spectral analysis

    Spectral analysis of the RR interval is an indirect, noninvasive measurement tool of heart rate variability. High-frequency RR signal (greater than 0.15 Hz) is associated with increased parasympathetic tone, and low-frequency RR signal (0.04-0.15 Hz) is associated with increased sympathetic tone.

    Time frame: Day 29

  8. High frequency in spectral analysis

    Spectral analysis of the RR interval is an indirect, noninvasive measurement tool of heart rate variability. High-frequency RR signal (greater than 0.15 Hz) is associated with increased parasympathetic tone, and low-frequency RR signal (0.04-0.15 Hz) is associated with increased sympathetic tone.

    Time frame: One time point between day 60 and day 90

  9. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. A total superior to 20/60 is generally considered abnormal. A level of 30 points is considered a definition of severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  10. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. A total superior to 20/60 is generally considered abnormal. A level of 30 points is considered a definition of severe depression.

    Time frame: Day 8

  11. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. A total superior to 20/60 is generally considered abnormal. A level of 30 points is considered a definition of severe depression.

    Time frame: Day 29

  12. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. A total superior to 20/60 is generally considered abnormal. A level of 30 points is considered a definition of severe depression.

    Time frame: One time point between day 60 and day 90

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Brugmann
    Brussels, 1020, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2019 to primary completion in Jun 2021, 19 months.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's 19 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2019
First posted
Dec 6, 2019
StartActual
Nov 12, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jun 23, 2021
CompletionActual
Jun 23, 2021
Last update
Jul 19, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 19, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04189354
Lead sponsor
Tatiana Besse-Hammer
Responsible party
Tatiana Besse-Hammer (Head of clinical research unit, Brugmann University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2019
Start date
Nov 12, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 23, 2021
Completion
Jun 23, 2021
Last update
Jul 19, 2022

Study contacts

Pierre Cole
principal investigator · CHU Brugmann

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion