CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04184024Updated Dec 3, 2019

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Massage and Kinesio Taping in Neck Pain

An interventional study of Massage and Kinesio tape in Neck Pain, sponsored by Ataturk Training and Research Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-03.

Sponsored by Ataturk Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2018, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of massage and Kinesio taping on pain, range of motion, disability and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain.

Read the detailed description

Neck pain is a common condition, affecting 30% to 50% of the general population, and is most prevalent in middle age.33 It is usually accompanied by a substantial effect on daily life, resulting in an extensive use of health care resources.

Several physical therapy applications such as massage therapy, kinesio taping, thermal and electrophysiological agents, hydrotherapy/spa therapy, and therapeutic exercises especially neck stabilization exercise are used to manage FM. Both massage therapy and kinesio taping have a favorable effect on clinical symptoms. However, it is not clear which method is more effective. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of massage and Kinesio taping on pain, range of motion, disability and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • neck pain, massage, kinesio tape,
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 42 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Ataturk Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 to 65 years of age,
  • having generalized neck pain for more than 3 months,
  • being volunteer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy,
  • inflammatory rheumatologic diseases,
  • malignity,
  • structural deformity,
  • previous surgery related to the cervical spine,
  • cervical spinal stenosis,
  • being allergic to Kinesio tape
  • severe psychological disorder,
  • any intervention that included exercise or physical therapy in the last 3 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Massage group

    Patients in this group were applied to massage plus neck stabilization exercise.

    Other: Massage · Other: Neck stabilization exercise

  • Active comparator
    Kinesio taping group

    Patients in this group were applied to Kinesio taping plus neck stabilization exercise.

    Other: Kinesio tape · Other: Neck stabilization exercise

Interventions

  • OtherMassage

    Soft tissue massage known as "Swedish massage" technique was applied to the neck area for 20 minutes. This massage was carried out 3 days a week for 4 weeks (12 sessions) by the supervisor physiotherapist.

  • OtherKinesio tape

    Patients were taped according to the Kenzo Kase's Kinesio Taping Method by an experienced physical therapist. The application was carried out in a relaxed sitting position. Y banding with extensor muscles on the back of the neck with muscle technique, I banding with the upper trapezius with muscle technique and I banding with ligament technique to the middle region of the neck were performed.

  • OtherNeck stabilization exercise

    Neck stabilization exercise was performed in stages with gradual progression according to the stages of motor learning and sensory-motor integration, namely, static, dynamic, and functional. The program started with postural training and then the cervical bracing technique with the activation of deep neck flexors for NSE was performed. The patients were asked to maintain a neutral spine during the exercises and throughout the day as much as possible. The difficulty and variety of exercises were increased weekly. It was carried out 3 days a week for 4 weeks (12 sessions) by the supervisor physiotherapist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Level (Visual Analog Scale)

    The pain level was assessed with the Visual Analog Scale, which consists of a horizontal line of 10 cm in length. For pain level assessment, "0" defines "no pain" and "10" defines "unbearable pain''. The participants are asked to mark the intensity of their pain level.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Turkish of the Short Form-36

    The quality of life was assessed with the Turkish of the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The SF-36 consists of 36 questions: physical functioning (10 items), role limitations due to physical health (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), social functioning (2 items), vitality (4 items), role limitations due to emotional health (3 items), mental health (5 items), general health perceptions (5 items) and changes in health over time (1 item, not included in the final score). The SF-36 score ranges from 0 (the worst score) to 100 (the best score). Thus, higher scores indicate better health. The participants are asked to fulfill the questionnaire.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks

  2. Turkish version of Neck Disability Index

    The disability level was measured with the Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI). It consists of 10 sections which include the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work-life, driving, sleeping and leisure activities. There are 6 responses for each section, scored 0 (no pain and no functional limitation) and 5 (worst pain and maximum limitation). The total score ranges from 0 to 50. Patients were asked to select the most appropriate option for each section.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks

  3. Range of Motion

    The range of motion of the neck joints of the patients was measured with a clinical goniometer (Baseline Evaluation Tools, USA) for flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements while sitting upright on the stool.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
    Ankara, 06760, Turkey
    • Seyda Toprak Çelenay · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04184024
Lead sponsor
Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Seyda TOPRAK CELENAY (associate professor, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 20, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 3, 2019

Study contacts

seyda toprak celenay, PT
Contact
sydtoprak@hotmail.com
+90-534-041-3986
seyda toprak celenay
principal investigator · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion