ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04181567Updated Nov 29, 2019

Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety, and Relapse of ECT to ECT Plus Agomelatine for Depressed Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of electroconvulsive therapy and agomelatine in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-29.

Sponsored by Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2014, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our hypothesis is that using antidepressants during the ECT has a better efficacy and longer time to relapse/recurrence to the ECT without antidepressants. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and time to relapse/recurrence of ECT to ECT plus agomelatine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Inpatients with major depressive disorder for ECT will be randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo or agomelatine 50 mg/d.

Read the detailed description

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the safe and the most effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder. It is still inconclusive whether antidepressants are continued during the course ot ECT. In terms of efficacy and safety, three essential questions arise: 1) does concomitant treatment improve the short-term antidepressant effects of ECT, 2) does concomitant treatment reduce the rate of early relapse/recurrence following ECT, 3) does concomitant treatment has more side effects? The purpose of this study is to conduct a clinical trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and time to relapse/recurrence of ECT to ECT plus agomelatine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

Methods: This is a prospective study. Inpatients with major depressive disorder for ECT will be randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo or agomelatine 50 mg/d. After the ECT, the patients who meet the response criteria (i.e., at least a 50% reduction in symptom scores) or receive at least 6 treatments (i.e., acute phase) will receive the agomelatine 50 mg/d for 3 months (i.e., follow-up phase). The severity of depression, severity of anxiety, psychosocial functioning and side effects will be measured using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS), Zung's Depression Scale (ZDS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and UKU Side Effect Rating Scale before ECT, after every 3 sessions of ECT, at the end of acute ECT, and monthly during the 3-month follow-up period. Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36, Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale(ASEX), MINI Mental State Examination (MMSE), neuropsychological tests, and electroencephalography will be assessed before ECT, after ECT, and after the 3-month follow-up period. Questionnaire for patient attitudes about ECT after acute ECT will be completed. The Pearson chi-square test will be used to compare the response rate and remission (i.e., HAM-17≦7) rate between two groups. Analyses of group differences in efficacy will be performed by generalized estimating equations or ANCOVA. Survival analysis will be used to compare the time to response/remission and time to relapse/recurrence (i.e., HAM-D-17≧14 or CGI-S ≧4 or rehospitalization) after ECT between two groups.

Expected results: The results will provide evidence base for clinicians to decide to use antidepressants during ECT or not.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • electroconvulsive therapy
  • agomelatine
  • relapse
  • major depressive disorder
  • response
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,041 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 588 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 79 across 2,530 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major depressive disorder
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • HAMD-17 >=18
  • CGI-S >=4
  • Treatment-resistant depression: a lack of response to two or more adequate trials of different classes of antidepressants
  • Given written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or organic mental disorders
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Female subjects with lactation or pregnancy
  • Serious medical conditions or neurological illnesses that restricte the use of ECT
  • Receiving ECT within the 6 months
  • Substance abuse/dependence within the 6 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    electroconvulsive therapy + agomelatine

    electroconvulsive therapy 2 times weekly + agomelatine 50 mg daily

    Other: electroconvulsive therapy · Drug: agomelatine

  • Active comparator
    electroconvulsive therapy + placebo

    electroconvulsive therapy 2 times weekly + placebo

    Other: electroconvulsive therapy · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Otherelectroconvulsive therapy

    electroconvulsive therapy 2 times weekly

    Also known as: ECT

  • agomelatine

  • DrugPlacebo

    placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17)

    The HAMD-17 is widely used in clinical setting to evaluate depression symptoms in the past week. Higher total HAMD-17 scores (ranging from 0 to 52) indicate more severe depression.

    Time frame: up to month 3.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical severity by Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)

    The CGI-S is developed for use in NIMH-sponsored clinical trials to provide a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. The CGI comprises one-item measures evaluating the severity of psychopathology from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate higher severity.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the CGI-S is rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the CGI-S is rated at months 1, 2, and 3.

  2. Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

    The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a 5-item self-rating scale designed to measure psychosocial functional impairment. Each item is scored from 0 (not affected at all) to 8 (severely affected).

    Time frame: In acute phase, the WSAS is rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the WSAS is rated at months 1, 2, and 3.

  3. UKU side effects rating scale

    UKU side effects rating scale, with the score of each item ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), is used to measure adverse events during the study period.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the UKU scale is rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the UKU scale is rated at months 1, 2, and 3.

  4. Electroencephalograph (EEG)

    The EEG is used to analyze the change of electroencephalogram complexity. EEG The recording lasted about 3 minutes after habituation to environment, and the EEG technician monitored subject vigilance. Recordings are in 19 electrodes (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, O1, O2) in the standard 10-20 International placement with mastoid reference. The raw EEG signal is transposed to MATLAB software (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) for processing. Each electrode complexity will be calculated.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the EEG is recorded at baseline and again at week 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the EEG is recorded at month 3.

  5. Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36)

    The SF-36 is used to assay the quality of life. Scores for the 8 SF-36 subscales range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing better QOL.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the SF-36 is rated at baseline and again at week 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the SF-36 is rated at month 3.

  6. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    The MMSE used to assay the cognitive function. It consists of 30 points. Lower scores indicate poorer performance and greater cognitive impairment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the MMSE is administered at baseline and again at week 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the MMSE is administered at month 3.

  7. Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX)

    The ASEX is used to assay the sexual dysfunction. The ASEX taps five domains of sexual function using 6-point Likert scales scored from 1 (hyperfunction) to 6 (extreme hypofunction) to yield a total score ranging from 5 to 30.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the ASEX is rated at baseline and again at week 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the ASEX is rated at month 3.

  8. Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS)

    The DSSS, a self-rating scale, is used to assay the severity of depression. The DSSS contains 22 items. Item responses are ranked from 0 to 3, with higher scores corresponding to more severe depression.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the DSSS is rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, the DSSS is rated at months 1, 2, and 3.

  9. The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS).

    The WMS is designed to measure different memory functions. Higher scores indicate higher memory functions.

    Time frame: In acute phase, the WMS is administered at baseline and again at week 6 (or on early termination). In follow-up phase, The WMS is administered at month 3.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 886, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lin CH, Yang WC, Chan MH, Chen CC. The Relationship Between Depression and Pain During Acute Electroconvulsive Therapy and Follow-Up Period for Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. J ECT. 2022 Sep 1;38(3):192-199. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000830. Epub 2022 Mar 1. PubMed 35220359 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2014 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 67 months.

Of 79 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Depressive Disorder, Major, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 60. This study's 67 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 98 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 58.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2019
First posted
Nov 29, 2019
StartActual
Mar 3, 2014
Primary completionActual
Oct 8, 2019
CompletionActual
Nov 22, 2019
Last update
Nov 29, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04181567
Lead sponsor
Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Collaborators
Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible party
Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD (Chief of Adult Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2019
Start date
Mar 3, 2014
Primary completion
Oct 8, 2019
Completion
Nov 22, 2019
Last update
Nov 29, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Agomelatine

Start the discussion