ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04181502HEPATOPROTECTUpdated Oct 17, 2022

Ischemic Preconditioning at a Distance in Liver Surgery

An interventional study of pneumatic tourniquet and No inflation in Liver Diseases, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-17.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2019, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During hepatic transection, it exists a high risk of perioperative blood loss. The haemorrhage and its consequences (hypovolemia and blood transfusion) might impact the short and long term morbidity The vascular control by hepatic pedicle clamping (Pringle's maneuver) or total hepatic vascular exclusion, helps minimizing blood loss and leads to a more extensive hepatic resection.

Side effects of vascular control result of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) : these reperfusion lesions results of different mechanisms than those responsible for the ischemic one. IRI cause lesions and postoperative dysfunction of the remaining liver.

Among strategies to reduce the adverse effects of IRI : ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) has been described. It can be either mechanical (intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping) or pharmacological (sevoflurane inhalation).

Short intermittent vascular occlusions in a organ might produce a resistance to a longer ischaemic period. It is certainly a physiological organ adaptation to tissue hypoxemia, which has a therapeutic potential when targeted.

During liver resection, ischaemic preconditioning is realised with periods of hepatic pedicle clamping and unclamping. It decrease morbidity and mortality and prevent postoperative hepatocellular insufficiency due to clamping and IRI at day 5.

Ischaemic preconditioning may also be applied remotely. Indeed, it is shown that short ischaemic periods in a target organ can also have a protective effect on distant others. This mechanism involve three signalling pathways : neuronal , humoral and systemic pathways.

In a previous randomized study, Kanoria and al, demonstrated that the remote ischaemic preconditioning group has shown significant lower rates of serum transaminases and higher liver clearance (spectrophotometry method) than the control group.

A latest study, measuring postoperative prothrombin rates has shown improved liver recovery due to halogen agents such as sevoflurane.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Remote ischemic preconditioning
  • liver resection
  • liver clearance.
03

In context

Liver Diseases

2,094 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is close to the median of 50 across 1,328 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.

Browse Liver Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 630 studies on the registry; 141 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled carcinogenic laparoscopy or laparotomy liver resection
  • Insured under the social security system
  • Inclined to comply to the study protocol and its duration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under guardianship
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe lower limb vascular disease
  • Emergency surgery
  • Contraindication of a treatment from the protocol
  • Psychological disorder with difficulty to accede the protocol
  • Absence of written informed consent
  • Refusal to sign the protocol
  • Non-registration to the social security system
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet

    Procedure: pneumatic tourniquet

  • Sham comparator
    No inflation

    No inflation of the pneumatic tourniquet placed on the lower limb

    Other: No inflation

Interventions

  • Procedurepneumatic tourniquet

    a pneumatic tourniquet around 200 mmHg after venous chase of the lower limb, during 5 minutes then deflated. Repeated twice after general anaesthesia and prior to incision.

  • OtherNo inflation

    No inflation of the pneumatic tourniquet placed on the lower limb

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Indocyanine green clearance

    Indocyanine green clearance (%/min) by indocyanine green retention, measured with Limon pulse spectrophotometry method.

    Time frame: at 5 days after liver resection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum transaminases rates

    Time frame: at day 1,day 3 and day 5 post-hepatectomy.

  2. Prothrombin rate

    Time frame: at day 5 post-hepatectomy.

  3. the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) score

    The score varies from 1 to 4.

    Time frame: at day 1,day 3 and day 5 post-hepatectomy.

  4. the Clavien & Dindo score

    this classification in order to rank a post operative complications. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V)

    Time frame: at day 30 post-hepatectomy

  5. duration of stay in the hospital.

    Time frame: at day 30 post-hepatectomy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hop Claude Huriez Chu Lille
    Lille, 59037, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04181502
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 29, 2019
Start date
Jun 16, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 6, 2020
Completion
Jan 6, 2020
Last update
Oct 17, 2022

Study contacts

Gilles Lebuffe, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion