ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04176380Updated May 15, 2025

RAPA-201 T Cell Therapy for Relapsed, Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 2 interventional study of RAPA-201 Autologous T cells in Relapsed, Refractory Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Rapa Therapeutics LLC. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Primary conditionMultiple MyelomaRegistry: RecurrenceReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Recurrence — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Multiple Myeloma
Why
  1. Recurrence describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Multiple Myeloma.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Rapa Therapeutics LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2023, 3 years 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RAPA-201-RRMM is an open-label, single-arm, non-randomized multicenter phase II study of RAPA-201 autologous T cells in adults with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least three (3) prior lines.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial evaluates autologous rapamycin-resistant Th1/Tc1 (RAPA-201) cells for therapy of relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The study population of RRMM patients is defined by: relapse after ≥ 3 prior regimens; exposure to ≥ 2 proteasome inhibitors (PI) (e.g. bortezomib), ≥ 2 immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) (e.g. lenalidomide), and ≥ 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (e.g., daratumumab); and refractory status to ≥ 1 PI agent and ≥ 1 IMiD agent. The primary study objective is to determine the overall response rate, as evaluated by IMWG criteria, of RAPA-201 cells and a pentostatin-cyclophosphamide (PC) host conditioning regimen in patients with RRMM. A sample size of 22 patients was selected to determine whether RAPA-201 therapy represents an active regimen in RRMM, as defined by a response rate (≥ partial remission) consistent with a 35% rate.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer characterized by clonal proliferation of plasma cells. MM is the second most common form of hematologic malignancy in the United States, with approximately 11,000 individuals dying from the disease in 2014. Due in part to the aging population, MM prevalence will dramatically increase in the next few decades. MM management has many FDA-approved options for the up-front setting, maintenance therapy, and therapy at second or third relapse. For patients with relapsed MM, therapy typically consists of triplet regimens approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including the KRd, DRd, and DPd regimens. Although triplet regimens are improved relative to prior therapies, they typically provide a progression-free survival of less than two years and cause substantial toxicities. Few standard, effective options exist for patients with MM who have more advanced disease and higher levels of drug refractoriness. In contrast to drug and monoclonal antibody therapy, which are essentially non-curative, T cell therapy can cure MM, as evidenced by long- term survival in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The promise of T cell therapy against MM is further exemplified by high response rates using gene-modified autologous CAR-T cell therapy directed against the BCMA target. However, CAR-T therapy is limited by variable tumor cell target expression, which compromises response durability leading to relapse. Furthermore, CAR-T cell products are expensive to manufacture, with the financial burden further complicated by frequent inpatient hospital monitoring and treatment of potentially lethal toxicities that include cytokine storm and neurologic damage. Thus, a great need exists to develop novel T cell therapies for RRMM that are safe, cost effective, and curative. We will evaluate one such promising candidate, namely, autologous rapamycin-resistant Th1/Tc1 cells (RAPA-201).

RAPA-201 cell therapy differs from existing approaches in several important categories. First, RAPA-201 cells are rendered rapamycin-resistant by proprietary ex vivo manufacturing that rapidly and cost effectively de- differentiates senescent patient T cells, which results in a therapeutic product enriched for the beneficial T central memory (TCM) subset and severely depleted of checkpoint inhibitory receptors that inhibit anti-cancer effects. This depth and breadth of T cell re-programming is not possible in vivo due to toxicity of pharmacologic agents, which can be rendered completely non-toxic through drug extracorporealization. Operating together, T cell rapamycin-resistance, TCM differentiation, and checkpoint removal promotes RAPA-201 T cell in vivo persistence and in vivo activity required for curative anti-tumor effects. Second, RAPA-201 cells are manufactured in a high, otherwise toxic dose of the critical anti-cancer cytokine IFN-α, which promotes a CD4+Th1 and CD8+Tc1 T cell phenotype that optimizes anti-tumor effects. Third, rapamycin-resistant T cells express a diverse T cell receptor repertoire that can address the complex biology of multiple myeloma, where tumor antigens are either not known or variable over time due to tumor genetic instability. Because polyclonal RAPA-201 T cells are capable of in vivo expansion to tumor antigens, RAPA-201 therapy can be applied not only to RRMM but also to other hematologic malignancies and common solid tumors, including lung cancer resistant to PD(L)-1 checkpoint therapy. And fourth, RAPA-201 cell therapy will be administered in combination with a novel host conditioning regimen consisting of pentostatin and low-dose, dose-adjusted cyclophosphamide (PC regimen). The PC regimen causes host lymphoid depletion while sparing host myeloid cells, thus permitting repeat therapeutic RAPA-201 cycles in the outpatient setting with reduced financial burden and without substantial neutropenia and associated opportunistic infection. As such, the PC regimen safely creates "immune space" in the RRMM patient, thereby potentiating the in vivo expansion and curative potential of RAPA-201 cells.

02

Conditions studied

  • Relapsed, Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Autologous Th1/Tc1 cell Therapy
  • RAPA-201
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma Reclassified

3,760 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 769 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 41 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Rapa Therapeutics LLC is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Compared within Multiple Myeloma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Recurrence. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2.
  • Diagnosis of , refractory multiple myeloma.
  • Exposure to at least three different including exposure to at least two proteosome inhibitors (e.g. bortezomib), and at least two immunomodulatory drugs (e.g. lenalidomide) and at least one anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody agent (e.g. daratumumab). To qualify as a prior line of therapy, ≥ 2 cycles of therapy must be administered unless the disease is refractory, or the regimen is not tolerated. Documentation of a prior line of therapy must include at least one of the following three items: [1] medical records detailing prior treatment, best response to treatment, and date of progression; [2] myeloma markers (SPEP, UPEP, Immunoglobulin, FLC) at time of treatment and progression; or, [3] documentation by investigator/treating physician to be included in patient's medical and research record (for example, note in electronic medical record), indicating prior treatment, best response to treatment, and data of progression.
  • Refractory status to ≥ one proteasome inhibitor AND ≥ one immunomodulatory drug. Refractory disease is defined as \<25% reduction in M-protein/free light chain difference (involved vs. uninvolved) or disease progression during treatment or ≤ 60 days after treatment cessation. Patient may or may not be refractory to anti-CD38 therapy.
  • Presence of secretory myeloma/, as defined by ONE of the following:

    1. Serum M-protein (SPEP) ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or
    2. Urine M-protein (UPEP) ≥ 200 mg/24 hours; or
    3. Light chain MM: Serum free light chain (FLC) assay ≥ 10 mg/dL (100 mg/L) and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa/lambda FLC ratio.
  • Must have a potential source of autologous T cells potentially sufficient to manufacture RAPA-201 cells, as defined by a circulating CD3+ T cell count ≥ 300 cells/µL.
  • Prior to apheresis, patients must be ≥ 14 calendar days from last myeloma therapy, major surgery, radiation therapy and participation in trials.
  • Patients must have recovered from clinical toxicities (resolution of toxicity to a value of ≤ 2).
  • (LVEF) by MUGA or 2-D echocardiogram within institution normal limits, with an LVEF level of ≥ 40%.
  • Serum creatinine ≤ to 2.5 mg/dL.
  • (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ to 3 x (ULN).
  • (ANC) of ≥ 1000 cells/µL (independent of growth factor support for at least 7 days prior to screening).
  • count of ≥ 50,000 cells/µL, with value obtained (independent of growth factor support or transfusion support for at least 7 days prior to screening).
  • count ≥ 8 grams/µL (independent of growth factor support or transfusion support for at least 7 days prior to screening).
  • ≤ 1.5 (except if due to Gilbert's disease).
  • Corrected DLCO ≥ 50% (Pulmonary Function Test).
  • No history of abnormal bleeding tendency, as defined by any inherited coagulation defect or history of internal bleeding.
  • Voluntary written consent must be given before performance of any study related procedure not part of standard medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to future medical care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior stem cell transplantation.
  • Current plasma cell leukemia (circulating myeloma > 20% of leukocytes).
  • Other active (except for non-melanoma skin cancer).
  • Non-secretory multiple myeloma (difficult to assess by IMWG criteria).
  • Evidence of systemic AL Amyloidosis involving any vital organ. Incidental histologic demonstration of amyloid deposition in marrow/within plasmacytoma is not considered organ involvement.
  • \<4 months.
  • Patients seropositive for , , or .
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.
  • History of cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • class III/IV congestive heart failure.
  • Uncontrolled angina/ischemic heart disease.
  • Subjects with known central nervous system disease.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Patients of childbearing age, or males who have a partner of , who are unwilling to practice .
  • Patients may be excluded at PI discretion or if it is deemed that allowing participation would represent an unacceptable medical or psychiatric risk.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(22)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Administration of RAPA-201 cells

    Biological: RAPA-201 Autologous T cells

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall response rate

    To determine the overall response rate, as evaluated by IMWG criteria, in patients with relapse, refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with autologous RAPA-201 cells and a pentostatin-cyclophosphamide (PC) host conditioning regimen.

    Time frame: One (1) year after last dose of RAPA-201 cells.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of therapy on disease control

    (1) To determine the effect of therapy on multiple myeloma disease control, including duration of response (DOR; time from initial tumor response to disease progression).

    Time frame: One (1) year after the last dose of RAPA-201 cells.

  2. Effect in Quality of Life

    To evaluate the effect of therapy on quality of life (QOL) using the FACT-BMT survey.

    Time frame: One (1) year after the last dose of RAPA-201 cells.

Other outcomes

  1. Immune reconstitution

    Immune reconstitution of participants receiving RAPA-201 cells will be measured using flow cytometry to obtain the absolute number of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells per microliter of blood.

    Time frame: Screening; Day 1 of every treatment cycle; End of treatment; Day 1 of Months 1, 3, 9 and 12 of Follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04176380
Lead sponsor
Rapa Therapeutics LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2019
Start date
Dec 2, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 6, 2023
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Daniel Fowler, M.D.
study director · Rapa Therapeutics LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Autologous rapamycin-resistant TH1/TC1 cells RAPA-201

Start the discussion