ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04164836Updated Jul 26, 2022

Effect of Nose Selection Using Rhnoscope on Epistaxis of Nasotracheal Intubation

An interventional study of rhinoscope in Nasotracheal Intubation, sponsored by Ajou University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-26.

Sponsored by Ajou University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
182
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rhinoscope is useful to exam intranasal structure. This information could be utilized to select more suitable nose for nasotracheal intubation. Nastoracheal intubation using more patent nose could be associated with decrease of the development of epistaxis which is most common complication in nasotracheal intubation.

Read the detailed description

Anterior rhinoscopy using rhinoscope is a simple way to view the intranasal structure, which allows you to observe the nasal mucosa, the inferior nasal concha, and in some cases, the nasal concha. You can see the nasal septum, polyps, and intranasal malformations. In addition, even when there are no structural abnormalities in the nasal cavity, the wider nasal cavity can be intuitively identified. This information is expected to assist in the selection of nostrils. It has not yet been studied whether anesthesiologists select nasal cavity for nasotracheal intubation using prosthesis can affect the occurrence of epistaxis.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the selection of a nostril for nasotracheal intubation by rhinoscope affects the incidence and severity of epistaxis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nasotracheal Intubation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • epistaxis
  • rhinoscope
03

In context

Epistaxis

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Epistaxis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 182 is above the median of 64 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Epistaxis.

Browse Epistaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ajou University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 173 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing surgery under nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • expected difficult intubation based on history, physical examination, weight.
  • bleeding tendency
  • past history of nasal surgery
  • symptom of difficulty of nasal respiration
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
182 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    control group

    nose selection will be done by random table

  • Experimental
    rhinoscope group

    nose selection will be done by rhinoscopy

    Diagnostic Test: rhinoscope

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testrhinoscope

    more suitable nose for nasotracheal intubation will be selected based on the view of rhinoscope.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of epistaxis

    percentage of the development of epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation

    Time frame: immediate after intubation

  2. incidence of epistaxis

    percentage of the development of epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation

    Time frame: 5 min after intubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. severity of epistaxis4. severe: interfere intubation by blood

    score based on severity of epistaxis will be recorded. 1: no epistaxis, 2: mild; blood on tube 3. moderate: blood pooling on pharynx

    Time frame: immediate after intubation

  2. severity of epistaxis

    score based on severity of epistaxis will be recorded. 1: no epistaxis, 2: mild; blood on tube 3. moderate: blood pooling on pharynx

    Time frame: 5 min after intubation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ajou universitiy school of medicine
    Suwon-si, Gyeong-gi Do 16499, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We will share data when reasonable personal request exist.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 28 months.

Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Epistaxis, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 25. This study's 28 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 12, 2019
First posted
Nov 15, 2019
StartActual
Nov 26, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 30, 2022
Last update
Jul 26, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04164836
Responsible party
yun jeong chae (Professor, Ajou University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 15, 2019
Start date
Nov 26, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2022
Completion
Mar 30, 2022
Last update
Jul 26, 2022

Study contacts

yun jeong chae, PhD MD
principal investigator · Ajou University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion