CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04160221RAPMUpdated Nov 14, 2024

Second Trimester Medical Abortion

An interventional study of 12 hours interval and 24 hours interval in Medical Abortion, Complete or Unspecified, Without Complication, sponsored by Sheba Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 43 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-14.

Sponsored by Sheba Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 43 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The use of Mifepristone, an antiprogesterone, and Misoprostol together, has been shown to make the medial abortion process more efficient and reduce the induction-to-abortion interval by almost 50%. Despite the recommended 24-48 Mifepristone-Misoprostol interval, recent retrospective study of a flexible interval, have revealed shorter total abortion time with shorter intervals. In this study we aim to compare 24 to 12 hours Mifepristone to Misoprostol intervals

Read the detailed description

Women are looking for termination of pregnancies in the second trimester, after 12 weeks of gestation for social and medical reasons, as well as due to intrauterine fetal demise. Both surgical and medical methods can be used, depending on the patients' preference, providers skills, availability of drugs and instruments and more. Methods of medical abortion can be performed with the use of prostaglandin analogues, mifepristone, oxytocin, foley catheter and osmotic dilators. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue (PGE1), is currently recommended over other agents due to its efficacy, low cost and ease of use. Misoprostol can be used alone or in combination with other agents. The use of Mifepristone, an antiprogesterone, and Misoprostol together, has been shown to make the medial abortion process more efficient and reduce the induction-to-abortion interval by almost 50%. Current guidelines recommend the use of Mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed by Misoprostol 400 mcg every 3-4, hours 24-48 later until expulsion of the fetus. Despite the recommended 24-48 Mifepristone-Misoprostol interval, recent retrospective study of a flexible interval, ≤12, 12-24 and >24 hours, have revealed shorter total abortion time (time from Mifepristone to fetal expulsion) with the shorter intervals. Thus, strict adherence to current guidelines may unnecessarily prolong the abortion procedure.

Objective Prompted by the need to explore more beneficial methods and regimes for second trimester medical abortion, we aim to compare 24 to 12 hours Mifepristone to Misoprostol intervals

Material and Methods Women eligible for second trimester medical abortion will be approached to enroll in the study at the clinic or emergency room when they arrive to schedule medical abortion. A research staff member will obtain informed consent. The patient will undergo a blood test including blood type, complete blood count and chemistry. Basic demographic information will be collected. A complete history and physical assessment will be performed. If an ultrasound report is not available to confirm gestational age dating, ultrasound will be performed to determine gestational age. A baseline cervical exam will be done at this visit to assess cervical consistency. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes will be used to provide allocation.

  • Patients allocated to group 1 will receive 200 mg Mifepristone orally, followed by Misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally 12 hours later and subsequently 400 mcg orally every three hours until fetal expulsion to a maximum of 5 doses.
  • Patients allocated to group 2 will receive 200 mg Mifepristone orally, followed by Misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally 24 hours later and subsequently 400 mcg orally every three hours until fetal expulsion to a maximum of 5 doses.

Patients will be discharged home after receiving Mifepristone, and hospitalized upon arrival for the Misoprostol administration.

If the abortion is not complete after five doses, the woman may be allowed to rest for 12 hours before starting the cycle again.

All participants will be contacted by phone as well as a chart review conducted to assess for delayed complications. During this follow up time, they will be asked to notify the research team if they should develop fatigue, malaise, abdominal pain, or jaundice. If these symptoms occur, a workup for liver injury would be performed. Patients will be asked to obtain repeat liver function tests within two weeks post-procedure to compare to their baseline hepatic panel.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medical Abortion, Complete or Unspecified, Without Complication

Keywords

  • Medical Abortion
  • Mifepristone
  • Misoprostol
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sheba Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 660 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 43 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years and older about to undergo medical second trimester abortion
  • 12+0 to 28+0 weeks of gestation
  • Singleton intrauterine pregnancy
  • Able to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study
  • Genital bleeding of unknown etiology; cancer of the breast, cervix, uterus, or ovaries; hepatic disease (current or history of)
  • Multiple gestation
  • Rupture of membranes
  • Taken a CYP3A4 inhibitor within 5 elimination half-lives of the drug from the procedure
  • Pre-dosing abnormal liver function tests
  • Patients at increased risk of hepatitis based on a history of any of the following:

    • Any history of underlying liver disorder, including hepatitis
    • A family history of hepatitis or currently living with a person 441 who has been given a diagnosis of hepatitis
    • A history of or currently working as a sex worker
    • A history of or currently using IV drugs
    • A self-reported history of alcoholic dependency or abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    12 hours interval

    Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol treatment

    Other: 12 hours interval

  • Active comparator
    24 hours interval

    Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol treatment

    Other: 24 hours interval

Interventions

  • Other12 hours interval

    Time interval between treatments

  • Other24 hours interval

    Time interval between treatments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Induction-abortion time

    Total induction to complete abortion ( estimated by hours)

    Time frame: Through completion of abortion, an estimated period of up to 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fever

    Fever measure above 38 degrees

    Time frame: From the beginning until completion of abortion,estimated up to two weeks

  2. Excessive blood loss

    Excessive blood loss estimated by the medical team ( remnants of blood on pad, active bleeding estimated to be equal to menstruation, heavier bleeding including blood clots, blood loss leading to hemodynamically instability including tachycardia and/or reduced blood pressure)

    Time frame: From the beginning until completion of abortion, estimated up to two weeks

  3. Any emergency department visit

    Emergency department visit during the abortion or reported on follow up

    Time frame: From the beginning until completion of abortion, estimated up to two weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Ramat-Gan, 56506, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD006714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2. PubMed 18254113 ↗
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1394-1406. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc. No abstract available. PubMed 23812485 ↗
  • Borgatta L, Kapp N; Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception. 2011 Jul;84(1):4-18. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 30. PubMed 21664506 ↗
  • Costescu D, Guilbert E. No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):750-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.010. PubMed 29861084 ↗
  • Li HWR, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mechanisms of action of emergency contraception pills. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Feb;24(1):11-12. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1555663. Epub 2019 Jan 21. No abstract available. PubMed 30664367 ↗
  • Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baro F, Nouri K, Selvaggi L, Sodowski K, Bestel E, Terrill P, Osterloh I, Loumaye E; PEARL II Study Group. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):421-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103180. PubMed 22296076 ↗
  • Blithe DL, Nieman LK, Blye RP, Stratton P, Passaro M. Development of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 for clinical indications. Steroids. 2003 Nov;68(10-13):1013-7. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(03)00118-1. PubMed 14667994 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04160221
Lead sponsor
Sheba Medical Center
Collaborators
Stanford University
Responsible party
Dr. Aya Mohr-Sasson (Principal Investigator, Sheba Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024
Completion
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 14, 2024

Study contacts

Aya A Mohr-Sasson, M.D
principal investigator · Sheba Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion