ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04159870Updated Feb 16, 2021

Rifaximin Versus Norfloxacin in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rifaximin and Norfloxacin in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, sponsored by Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-16.

Sponsored by Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
322
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background

Prophylaxis of SBP is indicated in three high-risk populations: patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, patients with low total protein content in ascitic fluid, and patients with a previous history of SBP (secondary prophylaxis).

Selective intestinal decontamination with norfloxacin, a quinolone with relatively poor gastrointestinal absorption and with antibacterial activity against GNB, is the most commonly used regimen, but several concerns have been recently raised in this regard.

A recent network meta-analysis published by the investigators showed that rifaximin determines interesting results in this setting but needs to be tested in further trials.

Given its favorable safety profile and the relatively low cost, rifaximin could represent the antibiotic of choice in long-term prophylaxis.

Study Objective To establish the prophylactic efficacy, of rifaximin as compared to norfloxacin in cirrhotic patients with low protein content in the ascitic fluid.

Protocol design Phase III, two-arms, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.

Trial population Patients with cirrhosis and ascites and with low protein content in the ascitic fluid (≤1.5 g/dL) and with deteriorated liver function (Child-Pugh score ≥B9, serum bilirubin level ≥3 mg/dL) or impaired renal function (creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL blood urea nitrogen level ≥25 mg/dL or hyponatremia ≤130 milliequivalent [mEq]/L)

Protocol Treatments

  • The Treatment arm will undergo rifaximin 1200 mg/day in 3 doses.
  • The Control arm will undergo norfloxacin 400 mg 1/die for 6 months

Primary Endpoint Prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episodes.

Secondary Endpoints

  • Prevention of mortality (both all-cause and liver-related mortality)
  • Preventions of hepatorenal syndrome
  • Prevention of other infections
  • Adverse events

Sample size and study duration It will be planned to enroll 322 patients (161 per arms) within 18 months. A minimum follow up of 6 months from the last patient recruited will be required.

Read the detailed description

Background

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a commonly observed and severe complication in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, with a reported prevalence ranging from 10% to 25% in hospitalized cirrhotic patients1.

Given the high mortality rate and the risk of developing hepato-renal syndrome (HRS), prophylaxis of SBP is indicated particularly in three high-risk populations: patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, patients with low total protein content in ascitic fluid, and patients with a previous history of SBP (secondary prophylaxis)2.

The ideal prophylactic agent should be safe, affordable, and effective particularly against anaerobic bacteria translocating from the gut as most episodes of SBP are thought to result from the translocation of enteric Gram-negative bacilli (GNB)3.

Selective intestinal decontamination with norfloxacin, a quinolone with relatively poor gastrointestinal absorption and with antibacterial activity against GNB, is the most commonly used regimen4, but several concerns have been recently raised in this regard. In fact, the epidemiology of bacterial infections in cirrhosis is evolving with an increasing incidence of infections caused by quinolone-resistant bacteria5; moreover, primary prophylaxis in low-protein ascitic patients requires long-term antibiotic regimens (whose exact duration is still matter of debate), hence less expensive and better tolerated agents such as rifaximin have been tested with conflicting results6.

A recent network meta-analysis published by the investigators showed that rifaximin determines interesting results in this setting but needs to be tested in further trials7.

Given its favorable safety profile and the relatively low cost, rifaximin could represent the antibiotic of choice in long-term prophylaxis.

Study Objective To establish the prophylactic efficacy, of rifaximin as compared to norfloxacin in cirrhotic patients with low protein content in the ascitic fluid.

Protocol design Phase III, two-arms, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.

Trial population Patients with cirrhosis and ascites and with low protein content in the ascitic fluid (≤1.5 g/dL) and with deteriorated liver function (Child-Pugh score ≥B9, serum bilirubin level ≥3 mg/dL) or impaired renal function (creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL blood urea nitrogen level ≥25 mg/dL or hyponatremia ≤130 mEq/L)

Protocol Treatments

  • The Treatment arm will undergo rifaximin 1200 mg/day in 3 doses.
  • The Control arm will undergo norfloxacin 400 mg 1/die for 6 months

Protocol

Baseline evaluation will include history and physical examination, liver and renal tests, ascitic fluid analysis and culture, fresh urine sediment, and abdominal ultrasonography. Treatment will start immediately after randomization. Follow-up visits will be performed every 4 weeks. Treatment compliance will be assessed by interviewing the patient and by tablet count at each visit. A patient will be considered noncompliant when the study medication will not be taken for 7 days or more, or will fail to take more than 20 % of their pills or miss two or more visits.

Medications will be interrupted when patients develop an episode of SBP (ascitic fluid neutrophil count[ 250 cell/ml with or without clinical evidence), or have upper gastrointestinal (GIT) bleeding or receive a liver transplant.

Diagnostic paracentesis will be performed when clinically indicated. Diagnosis of spontaneous bacteremia, SBP, urinary infection, and other infections will be made by biological fluid cultures and analysis; type-1 and type-2 HRS will be diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Ascites Club. Spontaneous bacteremia and SBP will be treated with ceftriaxone.

Primary Endpoint Prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episodes.

Secondary Endpoints

  • Prevention of mortality (both all-cause and liver-related mortality)
  • Preventions of hepatorenal syndrome
  • Prevention of other infections
  • Adverse events

Sample size and study duration It will be planned to enroll 322 patients (161 per arms) within 18 months. A minimum follow up of 6 months from the last patient recruited will be required.

Treatment strategy Patients complying with the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive rifaximin 1200 mg/day or norfloxacin 400 mg/day. No cross-over will be allowed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with cirrhosis and ascites and with low protein content in the ascitic fluid (≤1.5 g/dL) and with deteriorated liver function (Child-Pugh score ≥B9, serum bilirubin level ≥3 mg/dL) or impaired renal function (creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL blood urea nitrogen level ≥25 mg/dL or hyponatremia ≤130 mEq/L)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Previous history of SBP
  • Previous use of antibiotics within the previous two weeks
  • Previous GIT bleeding within one month
  • Resolving ascites for one month after diuretic therapy
  • Liver malignancy, organic renal disease
  • Human immunodeficiency virus infection
  • Known hypersensitivity to planned drugs
  • Refusal to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
322 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Rifaximin 1200 mg/day in 3 doses

    Drug: Rifaximin

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Norfloxacin 400 mg/day in one dose

    Drug: Norfloxacin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevention of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

    Rate of episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevention of mortality

    Rate of deaths observed

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Prevention of hepatorenal syndrome

    Rate of hepatorenal syndrome episodes

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Prevention of other infections

    Rate of other infections

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Adverse Events

    Rate of adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ospedali Riuniti Foggia
    Foggia, 71122, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fernandez J, Navasa M, Gomez J, Colmenero J, Vila J, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: epidemiological changes with invasive procedures and norfloxacin prophylaxis. Hepatology. 2002 Jan;35(1):140-8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.30082. PubMed 11786970 ↗
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1. No abstract available. PubMed 20633946 ↗
  • Piano S, Brocca A, Mareso S, Angeli P. Infections complicating cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2018 Feb;38 Suppl 1:126-133. doi: 10.1111/liv.13645. PubMed 29427501 ↗
  • Soriano G, Guarner C, Tomas A, Villanueva C, Torras X, Gonzalez D, Sainz S, Anguera A, Cusso X, Balanzo J, et al. Norfloxacin prevents bacterial infection in cirrhotics with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1992 Oct;103(4):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91514-5. PubMed 1397884 ↗
  • Aparicio JR, Such J, Pascual S, Arroyo A, Plazas J, Girona E, Gutierrez A, de Vera F, Palazon JM, Carnicer F, Perez-Mateo M. Development of quinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli in stools of patients with cirrhosis undergoing norfloxacin prophylaxis: clinical consequences. J Hepatol. 1999 Aug;31(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80225-6. PubMed 10453941 ↗
  • Menshawy A, Mattar O, Barssoum K, AboEl-Naga AM, Salim HM, Mohamed AMF, Elgebaly A, Abd-Elsalam S. Safety and Efficacy of Rifaximin in Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20(4):380-387. doi: 10.2174/1389450119666180924145156. PubMed 30246636 ↗
  • Facciorusso A, Papagiouvanni I, Cela M, Buccino VR, Sacco R. Comparative efficacy of long-term antibiotic treatments in the primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Liver Int. 2019 Aug;39(8):1448-1458. doi: 10.1111/liv.14109. Epub 2019 Apr 25. PubMed 30920712 ↗
  • Goel A, Rahim U, Nguyen LH, Stave C, Nguyen MH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: rifaximin for the prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Dec;46(11-12):1029-1036. doi: 10.1111/apt.14361. Epub 2017 Oct 9. PubMed 28994123 ↗
  • Zacharias HD, Kamel F, Tan J, Kimer N, Gluud LL, Morgan MY. Rifaximin for prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD011585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011585.pub2. PubMed 37467180 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2021, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2019
First posted
Nov 12, 2019
StartActual
Nov 5, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Nov 20, 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2021
Last update
Feb 16, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04159870
Lead sponsor
Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia
Responsible party
Antonio Facciorusso (Principal Investigator, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2019
Start date
Nov 5, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 16, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rifaximin

Start the discussion