CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03908229ADRUpdated Mar 3, 2020

Trainee Participation Increases Colon Adenoma Detection Rate

An interventional study of Trainee colonoscopy and Experienced physician colonoscopy in Colonic Polyp, sponsored by Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia. Completed at 4 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-03.

Sponsored by Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
812
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previous studies that examined whether the presence of an additional observer, more specifically a GI fellow, during colonoscopy can enhance detection of all polyps and adenomas yielded conflicting results. Of note, all of the aforementioned studies were retrospective and robust evidence derived from well-designed randomized controlled trials are lacking.

The study objective is to examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy influence overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate.

It will be planned to enroll 812 patients (406 per arms) within 1 year. Adenoma detection rate will be the primary outcome.

Read the detailed description

Background Colonoscopy is instrumental in colon cancer prevention as through polypectomy it may interfere with the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, thus resulting in a clear survival benefit.

However, not all adenomatous polyps are identified during a colonoscopy. The overall false-negative ("miss") rate for colonic adenomas is estimated to be as high as 24%, according to studies of same-day, tandem colonoscopies. In addition, flat and depressed lesions often remain undetected during white-light colonoscopy.

Low-cost optimization of existing resources, such as use of a second observer or water-aided colonoscopy, were recently found to be able to significantly increase colon adenoma detection rate (ADR).

Previous studies that examined whether the presence of an additional observer, more specifically a GI fellow, during colonoscopy can enhance detection of all polyps and adenomas yielded conflicting results. Of note, all of the aforementioned studies were retrospective and robust evidence derived from well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking.

.

Technical procedure In the control arm all colonoscopy will be performed by full-time board-certified gastroenterologists who have each done more than 5000 colonoscopy examinations.

In the investigation arm colonoscopy will be performed by gastroenterology fellows. The fellows will always start the case and proceed generally until they are unable to make further progress despite "coaching" from the staff attending.

During the procedures with fellows, the staff attending will always actively participate in the entire procedure and assess for the presence of any lesions.

Colonoscopies will be performed by using only high-definition white-light (HDWL) scopes (Olympus 180 series CF H180).

Bowel preparation will be uniform and consist of 4 L of polyethylene glycol. All detected lesions will be endoscopically removed and samples will be sent to pathologists for histological diagnosis.

Treatment strategy Patients complying with the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to undergo colonoscopy performed by a trainee (under attending physician supervision) or colonoscopy performed by an experienced physician.

Sample size calculation and statistical considerations On the basis of previous retrospective comparative reports, the study is designed to detect an increase in ADR by 8%. Therefore, 812 patients (406 per arm) will be required to have a 80% power to detect the target difference at a 0.05 significance level (two sided). The primary endpoint will be ADR. In order to collect the estimated sample size, up to 1 year of recruiting will be needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonic Polyp
03

In context

Adenoma

657 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenoma; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 812 is above the median of 250 across 412 interventional studies indexed under Adenoma.

Browse Adenoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Familial history of polyposis syndrome (familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, juvenile polyposis).
  • Incomplete colonoscopy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Refusal to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
812 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trainee colonoscopy

    In the investigation arm colonoscopy will be performed by gastroenterology fellows. The fellows will always start the case and proceed generally until they are unable to make further progress despite "coaching" from the staff attending. During the procedures with fellows, the staff attending will always actively participate in the entire procedure and assess for the presence of any lesions.

    Procedure: Trainee colonoscopy

  • Active comparator
    Experienced physician colonoscopy

    In the control arm all colonoscopy will be performed by full-time board-certified gastroenterologists who have each done more than 5000 colonoscopy examinations.

    Procedure: Experienced physician colonoscopy

Interventions

  • ProcedureTrainee colonoscopy

    Colonoscopy performed by trainee

  • ProcedureExperienced physician colonoscopy

    Experienced physician colonoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adenoma detection rate

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Advanced adenoma detection rate

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Polyp detection rate

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Sessile serrated adenoma detection rate

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Adenoma per colonoscopy rate

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Ospedale di San Severo
    San Severo, Out Of USA Or Canada 71122, Italy
  • Ospedale di Taranto
    Taranto, Out Of USA Or Canada 71122, Italy
  • Ospedale di Brindisi
    Brindisi, 71122, Italy
  • Ospedali Riuniti Foggia
    Foggia, 71122, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2000-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07662.x. PubMed 14499778 ↗
  • Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2866-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00905.x. PubMed 17227527 ↗
  • Facciorusso A, Triantafyllou K, Murad MH, Prokop LJ, Tziatzios G, Muscatiello N, Singh S. Compared Abilities of Endoscopic Techniques to Increase Colon Adenoma Detection Rates: A Network Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2439-2454.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.058. Epub 2018 Dec 6. PubMed 30529731 ↗
  • Gianotti RJ, Oza SS, Tapper EB, Kothari D, Sheth SG. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2831-2837. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4228-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12. PubMed 27405989 ↗
  • Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneko H, Fujiyama Y, Komatsu H, Nagumo H, Tanaka S, Hibi T. Trainee participation during colonoscopy adversely affects polyp and adenoma detection rates. Digestion. 2011;84(3):245-6. doi: 10.1159/000330736. Epub 2011 Sep 7. No abstract available. PubMed 21912131 ↗
  • Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, McNeil RB, Cleveland P, Gill KR, Schore A, Ghabril M, Raimondo M, Gross SA, Wallace MB. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060. Epub 2011 Apr 8. PubMed 21481861 ↗
  • Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Tonti P, Licinio R, Del Prete V, Neve V, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Impact of fellow participation on colon adenoma detection rates: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Dec;92(6):1228-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 17. PubMed 32433915 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03908229
Lead sponsor
Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia
Responsible party
Antonio Facciorusso (Assistant Professor of Gastroenterology, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2019
Start date
Apr 5, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2019
Completion
Jan 10, 2020
Last update
Mar 3, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion