CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04159324StroCareUpdated Dec 29, 2023

StroCare - Optimised Cross-sectoral,Coordinated Treatment of Stroke Patients With Patient-orientated Outcome Measurement

An interventional study of optimized cross-sectoral, structured and coordinated treatment pathway that integrates a patient-centred outcome evaluation in Stroke, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-29.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
409
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Trial is a multi-centred controlled interventional study with a pre-post design. The primary aim of the study is the evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the StroCare treatment.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is the second most common cause of death in Germany and the most common cause for life-long disability in adulthood. After stroke, patients often experience incisive changes in their health, daily routine and quality of life. The developed model of care (StroCare treatment) forms a cross--sectoral, structured and coordinated treatment pathway that integrates a patient-centred outcome evaluation. It aims to optimize the transition from acute inpatient treatment after an acute stroke to the ambulant neurological rehabilitation treatment. This is done firstly by creating an electronic portal solution for a safe and coordinated transmission of clinical data between the three participating hospitals and five stroke-specialized ambulant rehabilitation clinics and secondly by introducing a case-manager provided by the participating health insurance agency for patient support and aftercare coordination. The presented study is a multi-centred controlled interventional study with a pre-post design. Stroke patients in both groups are assessed after the index ischemic event and 12 months thereafter. Further sources of information are the medical record, the electronic portal (only intervention group), and routine data provided by the collaborating BARMER health insurance agency (for the Intervention and control group and additionally for a historic control). The main hypotheses are : (1) The StroCare treatment is more effective than the routine aftercare treatment (primary outcome: patient-reported physical quality of life) and (2) the StroCare treatment reduces costs for care and in the inpatient sector by providing more coordinated and thorough rehabilitation and outpatient aftercare.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
  • Cross-sectoral care
  • Stroke aftercare
  • Aftercare coordination
  • Post-rehabilitation support
  • Evidence based treatment
  • Patient-centred care
  • Quality of life
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Functional status
  • Feasibility
  • Acceptance
  • Process evaluation
  • Health economics
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 409 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in inpatient care in the stroke unit of one of the participating acute clinics who are insured at the BARMER health insurance agency with the following diagnosis (ICD-10):
  • Ischemic attack (I63)
  • Transient ischemic attack and related syndromes (G45)
  • Intracerebral haermorrhage (I64)
  • Written informed consent
  • Sufficient mastery of German language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substantially impaired communication capacity due to aphasia or dementia
  • Patients with artificial Respiration
  • Insufficient adherence
  • Premorbid score of mRS≥4
  • Patients with artificial Respiration (Z99.1)
  • Dementia (F00.x., F01.x. or G30.x) or aphasia (R47)
  • Death during inpatient Treatment or the Admission to a nursing home following the acute treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
409 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    StroCare treatment group

    Optimized cross-sectoral, structured and coordinated treatment pathway that integrates a patient-centred outcome evaluation

    Other: optimized cross-sectoral, structured and coordinated treatment pathway that integrates a patient-centred outcome evaluation

  • No intervention
    control group

    routine aftercare stroke treatment

Interventions

  • Otheroptimized cross-sectoral, structured and coordinated treatment pathway that integrates a patient-centred outcome evaluation

    the optimized treatment pathway includes coordinated transitions between rehabilitation phases and institutes using individual case management and portal solutions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported physical QoL: PROMIS-10

    Patient-reported physical Quality of Life measured with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10); one of two provided global scores: Global Physcial Health with scores ranging from 0-20 and higher scores indicating better health state.

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported mental QoL

    Patient-reported mental Quality of Life measured with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10); one of two provided global scores: Global Mental Health with scores ranging from 0-20 and higher scores indicating better health state.

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  2. Patient-reported mental health status

    Patient reported mental health Status measured with the Patient health questionnaire (PHQ-4); the questionnaire provides two sub-scores measuring anxiety and depression with scores ranging from 0-6 each with higher scores indiciating more symptoms of anxiety or depression, respectively

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  3. Functional Status modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq)

    Functional Status measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS); the nRS ranges from 0 (no disability) to 6 (death)

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  4. Overall survival

    Overall survival measured with the ICHOM Standard set

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  5. Stroke recurrence

    Stroke recurrence measured with the ICHOM Standard set

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  6. Utilisation of health care Services

    Utilisation of health care Services extracted from the medical record and the electronic Portal (only Intervention Group), i.e., number of admissions to hospital, number of outpatient contacts, weekly hours of physiotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  7. Patient' s waiting time between Treatment phases (Transition) to the ambulant neurological Rehabilitation Treatment)

    Waiting time extracted from the medical record and the electronic Portal (only Intervention Group)

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  8. Success in reahin target values of relevant risk factors (individually defined target values based on available guidelines): blood pressure

    Current values Blood Pressure will be extracted from the medical record and the electronic portal and compared to the individually defined target values based on current guidelines and individuall assessement of the overall patient's situation

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  9. Success in reahin target values of relevant risk factors (individually defined target values based on available guidelines): LDL-cholesterol

    Current values of LDL-cholesterol will be extracted from the medical record and the electronic portal and compared to the individually defined target values based on current guidelines and individuall assessement of the overall patient's situation

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  10. Success in reahin target values of relevant risk factors (individually defined target values based on available guidelines): HbA1c

    Current values of HbA1c will be extracted from the medical record and the electronic portal and compared to the individually defined target values based on current guidelines and individuall assessement of the overall patient's situation

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

  11. Costs

    Routine data

    Time frame: 1 year after index ischemic event

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rimmele DL, Schrage T, Brettschneider C, Engels A, Gerloff C, Harter M, Rosenkranz M, Schmidt H, Kriston L, Thomalla G. Rationale and design of an interventional study of cross-sectoral, coordinated treatment of stroke patients with patient-orientated outcome measurement (StroCare). Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Feb 2;3(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00107-2. PubMed 33526148 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04159324
Lead sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Albertinen Krankenhaus, Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude GmbH, Reha Centrum Hamburg GmbH, Klinikum Bad Bramstedt GmbH, MediClin Klinikum Soltau GmbH, VAMED Klinik Geesthacht, VAMED Rehaklinik Damp, BARMER Krankenkasse, Lohmann und Birkner medizinisches ServiceCenter GmbH, Forcare GmbH
Responsible party
Götz Thomalla, MD (Prof. Dr, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2023
Completion
Dec 5, 2023
Last update
Dec 29, 2023

Study contacts

Götz Thomalla, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion