ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04154527Updated Mar 17, 2020

Bladder Displacement During Abdominal and Pelvic Floor Exercises

An observational study in Postpartum Disorder, sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-17.

Sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
64
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the bladder base displacements during abdominal and pelvic floor exercises in postpartum women comparing to nulliparous women

Read the detailed description

Postpartum women are at increased risk of suffering pelvic floor dysfunctions. However, only a few researches are focused on the exercises physiological effect at the postpartum recovery period.

A prospective observational study was designed to evaluate the protective or the prolapsed effect of abdominal and pelvic floor exercises in postpartum women.

Two groups were established: Group A was composed of primiparous women during postpartum period and group B of nulliparous women. Both groups practiced the same set of 6 abdominal and perineum exercises. The bladder descent was registered by ultrasonography, and the correct execution was controlled in both groups by superficial pelvic floor and abdominal electromyography.

A Graphical User Interface on MATLAB software has been developed for aiding in offline measurement process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postpartum Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pelvic floor
  • abdominal muscles
  • ultrasonography
  • postpartum
03

In context

Puerperal Disorders

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Puerperal Disorders; 10 are open to participants now.

Browse Puerperal Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Castilla-La Mancha is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

participants were recruited at the midwife consultation from a Primary Care Health center.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • women at postpartum period (more than 6 and less than 12 weeks after vaginal birth)
  • willingness to participate in the study
  • ability to contract Pelvic Floor Muscles correctly
  • written consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • caesarean birth
  • pelvic Floor disorders
  • neurological diseases
05

Study design

Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • postpartum women with no pelvic floor disorders

    This group realised a set of 6 abdominal and pelvic floor exercises, with a muscle recruitment of 25% of maximum force. Exercise A: Pelvic Floor contraction Exercise B: Pelvic Floor and Deep Abdominal muscles contraction Exercise C: Pelvic Floor, Deep Abdominal muscles contraction, and axial Stretching Exercise D: Pelvic Floor, Deep and Superficial Abdominal muscles contraction Exercise E: Abdominal Crunch Exercise Exercise F: Low pressure Abdominal Exercise The correct muscle contraction execution was controlled by superficial pelvic floor and abdominal electromyography. The bladder base and neck displacement was registered by Transabdominal Ultrasound (TAUS) and Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) respectively. To image the bladder base and the bladder neck a 3.5 MHz (megahertz) curved linear array ultrasound transducer was used (LOGIQe Ultrasound,General Electric Healthcare, USA) with the ultrasound unit set in B mode.

    Other: Pelvic Floor and Abdominal Exercises

  • nulliparous women with no pelvic floor disorders

    This group realised a set of 6 abdominal and pelvic floor exercises, with a muscle recruitment of 25% of maximum force. Exercise A: Pelvic Floor contraction Exercise B: Pelvic Floor and Deep Abdominal muscles contraction Exercise C: Pelvic Floor, Deep Abdominal muscles contraction, and axial Stretching Exercise D: Pelvic Floor, Deep and Superficial Abdominal muscles contraction Exercise E: Abdominal Crunch Exercise Exercise F: Low pressure Abdominal Exercise The correct muscle contraction execution was controlled by superficial pelvic floor and abdominal electromyography. The bladder base and neck displacement was registered by Transabdominal Ultrasound (TAUS) and Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) respectively. To image the bladder base and the bladder neck a 3.5 MHz (megahertz)curved linear array ultrasound transducer was used (LOGIQe Ultrasound,GE eneral Electric Healthcare, USA) with the ultrasound unit set in B mode.

    Other: Pelvic Floor and Abdominal Exercises

Interventions

  • OtherPelvic Floor and Abdominal Exercises

    two repetitions of each exercise, during exhalation phase

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cranial or Caudal bladder base displacement measured in cm during the set of 6 exercises.

    Cranial or Caudal bladder base displacement during pelvic floor and abdominal exercises, comparing the baseline at rest to the position at 25% of muscle recruitment, in each exercise.

    Time frame: between 6 and 12 weeks after birth

  2. Vertical and horizontal bladder neck displacement measured in cm during the set of 6 exercises.

    Vertical and horizontal displacement of the bladder neck during pelvic floor and abdominal exercises, comparing the baseline at rest to the position at 25% of muscle recruitment in each exercise.

    Time frame: between 6 and 12 weeks after birth

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha
    Toledo, Castilla La Mancha 45071, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK, Neumann P. Comparison of transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and functional manoeuvres in continent and incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):779-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0225-4. Epub 2006 Oct 17. PubMed 17043739 ↗
  • Barton A, Serrao C, Thompson J, Briffa K. Transabdominal ultrasound to assess pelvic floor muscle performance during abdominal curl in exercising women. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1789-95. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2791-9. Epub 2015 Jul 28. PubMed 26215905 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All the individual participant data that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The data will be available within 6 months after study completion

Access criteria: Data access will be reviewed by an external independent Review Panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 29 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2019
First posted
Nov 6, 2019
StartActual
May 2, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 14, 2019
CompletionEst.
Nov 2020
Last update
Mar 17, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04154527
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2019
Start date
May 2, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 14, 2019
Completion
Nov 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 17, 2020

Study contacts

Sandra M Martinez, PHD student
principal investigator · University of A Coruña. Faculty of Physiotherapy, Spain

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion