An observational study in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by University of Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.
Sponsored by University of Houston · Observational
Parkinson's disease (PD), one of the most common neurological disorders, affects at least 10 million people worldwide. The cardinal motor impairments are tremor, bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, and postural instability. While dopaminergic medication and surgical treatment have been shown to suppress tremor, bradykinesia, and muscle rigidity, they do not prevent the progression of the disease or effectively treat postural instability. The latter impairment, which often leads to frequent falls, substantially restricts motor performance and daily activities.
PD is commonly managed in outpatient neurology or movement disorder clinics. Clinical studies have shown that physical and balance rehabilitation regimens supervised by physical therapists can improve postural stability in people with PD for short (hours to days) and long (weeks to months) periods. Cost, limited availability of physical therapists, etc., however, often prohibit many people with PD from undertaking such regimens. Evidence is mounting that periodic and continuous exercising is important for people with PD who are under care at home. Nevertheless, when given a rehabilitation regimen to practice at home, compliance (i.e., adherence) and engagement generally decrease in the absence of real-time therapeutic feedback. The PI has developed a smartphone-based, wearable balance rehabilitation system, known as the Smarter Balance System (SBS), which supplies real-time feedback to people with PD practicing balance rehabilitation regimens at home.
The objectives of this study are to assess and compare the results of long-term rehabilitative balance training for people with PD performing in-home balance training regimens with assistive guidance via the SBS (intervention group) to people following a typical paper-based regimen (control group). The carry-over effects of long-term rehabilitative training by the intervention group and the control group on static/dynamic balance performance, daily activities, and confidence in less fear of falling are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
This study examines static/dynamic balance performance, daily activities, and confidence in less fear of falling for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) performing in-home balance exercises with a smartphone-based wearable telerehabilitation system (intervention group) compared to typical paper-based balance exercises (control group). Twenty-two subjects with idiopathic PD will be randomly assigned to either of two groups of eleven (intervention group (IG) and control group (CG)). The experimental design will include laboratory assessments (i.e., pre-assessment baseline at the beginning of week 1, post-assessment at the end of week 6, and retention-assessment 1 month after week 6) and in-home balance exercises. IG and CG will perform in-home balance exercises (3 days per week for 6 consecutive weeks) with the Smarter Balance System (SBS) recently developed by the PI or the paper-based regimen, respectively. Both groups will also use Fitbits for 6 weeks.
Laboratory assessments: Subjects will be quantitatively assessed for static/dynamic balance performance using a measure for the range of limits of stability (LOS) in both anterior-posterior (A/P) and medial-lateral (M/L) directions, and a Sensory Organization Test (SOT) consisting of six conditions (1: Normal vision and fixed support; 2: Absent vision and fixed support; 3: Sway-referenced vision and fixed support; 4: Normal vision and sway-referenced support; 5: Sway-referenced support and absent vision; and 6: Sway-referenced vision and sway-referenced support) using a Balance Master® (NeuroCom International Inc., USA). During the SOT, center of pressure (COP) data as a function of the six SOT conditions will be collected at a rate of 100 Hz for postural sway analysis. After the completion of quantitative balance assessments, balance performance will be qualitatively assessed using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). A modified Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) will be used to collect the levels of exercise and non-exercise physical activity. After completion of the pre-assessment, a member of the research team will train subjects to use the SBS's smartphone and the Fitbit. Only the IG will be additionally trained in the use of the custom belt and the walker and multimodal biofeedback for in-home dynamic WSBE guided by the SBS. For CG subjects, the physical therapist (Co-I) will review the paper-based regimen for in-home dynamic WSBE. After completion of the post-assessment, only the IG will complete a usability and acceptability questionnaire (UAQ) for the SBS.
In-home balance exercises: Both groups will use the SBSs and Fitbits for 6 consecutive weeks. Only the IG will complete in-home dynamic weight-shifting balance exercises (i.e., physical therapists' recommended dynamic balance exercises, hereafter dynamic WSBE) with the SBS (3 days per week). The CG will perform dynamic WSBE following the paper-based regimen (3 days per week) in accordance with the Health Professionals' Guide to the Physical Management of Parkinson's disease, including detailed descriptions regarding stance condition, movements in both A/P and M/L directions, and repetitions. Only the CG will use the SBS's smartphones and the Fitbits (the SBS's custom belt will not be provided to the IG). To assure a safe exercise environment, both groups will perform in-home dynamic WSBE by standing inside a walker (no wheels). For the IG, the instructional video provided by the SBS will show how to perform dynamic WSBE in both A/P and M/L directions by standing inside the walker without touching or holding onto it unless the subject experiences loss of balance. For the CG, paper-based instructions will be provided. Both groups will be instructed to continue taking prescribed PD medication. After each trial, the IG smartphone app will store exercise-related data. The IG and CG smartphones will store physical activity data (daily number of taken steps and associated distance) collected from the Fitbit.
Performance metrics: Measured data from the Balance Master®, the SBSs, and the Fitbits will be analyzed using MATLAB (The MathWorks, USA). As a function of the pre/post/retention-assessments, two primary outcome measures (range of LOS and SOT score) will be used to evaluate static/dynamic balance performance. Ranges of LOS in degrees correspond to the furthest deviations of the body tilt in both A/P and M/L directions. The SOT score that can be directly obtained from the Balance Master® ranges from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates no postural sway and 0 indicates a fall. The four supplementary outcome measures, which are standard metrics for assessing balance performance, are a root mean square of postural sway (RMS sway) in both A/P and M/L directions, elliptical area of postural sway (sway area), and approximate entropy of postural sway (sway ApEn). Both RMS sway and sway area are linear measures of balance performance, and the sway ApEn is a non-linear measure quantifying the complexity and regularity of postural stability. For the IG, the UAQ score (Likert scale) will be used to assess the usability and acceptability of the SBS, and the IG's compliance with the in-home balance training regimens, total exercise time, and number of completed exercises will be quantitatively analyzed. For both groups, daily number of taken steps and associated distance obtained from Fitbits and ABC scale, FES, and CHAMPS score will be analyzed.
4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 96 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.
Browse Parkinson Disease studies →University of Houston is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (33%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population is individuals diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD).
Exclusion Criteria:
Have any peripheral, neurological, or musculoskeletal conditions other than PD.
This group will complete in-home dynamic weight-shifting balance exercises (i.e., physical therapists' recommended dynamic balance exercises) with a smartphone-based wearable telerehabilitation system.
Other: Smartphone-based balance exercises
A smartphone-based wearable telerehabilitation system will provide video and audio instructions on how to perform in-home dynamic weight-shifting balance exercises (i.e., physical therapists' recommended dynamic balance exercises).
Usability and Acceptability Questionnaire (UAQ)
The Usability and acceptability questionnaire (UAQ) is a self-reported questionnaire used by subjects to assess the usability and acceptability of the proposed smartphone-based wearable telerehabilitation system. The Usability and acceptability questionnaire (UAQ) has a comparative Likert scale survey (strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), neither disagree nor agree (3), agree (4), or strongly agree (5)), with 5 being very confident in using the system and 1 being not confident at all in using the system.
Time frame: Post-assessment (at the end of week 6)
The study originally planned to recruit 20 participants; however, recruitment was discontinued because of COVID-19 restrictions at the University of Houston. As a result, 9 participants were enrolled.
| Milestone | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Started | 9 |
| Completed | 7 |
| Not completed | 2 |
| Withdrew: Hip joint surgery | 1 |
| Withdrew: Other health reason | 1 |
The Usability and acceptability questionnaire (UAQ) is a self-reported questionnaire used by subjects to assess the usability and acceptability of the proposed smartphone-based wearable telerehabilitation system. The Usability and acceptability questionnaire (UAQ) has a comparative Likert scale survey (strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), neither disagree nor agree (3), agree (4), or strongly agree (5)), with 5 being very confident in using the system and 1 being not confident at all in using the system.
| Score on a scale | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Usability and Acceptability Questionnaire (UAQ) | 4.86 ± 0.38 |
Collected over 4 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | 0/7 (0%) | 0/7 (0%) | 0/7 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 0 |
| >=65 years | 7 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Mean | 69.86 ± 11.84 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Female | 2 |
| Male | 5 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 2 |
| White | 0 |
| More than one race | 1 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| United States | 9 |
| Range of limits of stability(Degrees) | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Mean | 5 ± 1.3 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — All of the materials collected are for research purposes only, and all data will be kept in strict confidence. No information will be given to anyone without permission from the subject. The consent form includes the informed consent statement required by University of Houston IRB for studies involving human subjects. This statement guarantees confidentiality and identifies the subject as the owner of information we collected from this study. Confidentiality will be ensured by use of identification codes. All data, whether generated in the laboratory or at the subject's home, will be identified with an identification code unique to the subject.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Houston