CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04128553Updated Aug 1, 2022

The Effect of Nurse-led Motivational Interviewing Based on the Trans-theoretical Model

An interventional study of Intervention motivational interview group in Older Adult, Motivational Interviewing and Physical Activity, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 74 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-01.

Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2019, registered Oct 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
117
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Older adults constitute the age group that leads the most sedentary life in society and is mostly affected by physical inactivity.

This study was conducted to determine how nurse-led Motivational Interviewing (MI) based on the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) affected promoting physical activity in older adults.

A randomised controlled trial. The population of this trial was composed of seniors aged between 65 and74 living in a family health center area in Yozgat, Turkey (N=1630). The study sample, estimated via power analysis (d=0.30; 1-β=0.80; α=0.05), constituted 117 older adults (Intervention Group (IG) n=58; Control Group (CG) n=59) who met the inclusion criteria. The data were gathered via a questionnaire, TTM-Scales, Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (PASE), KATZ-ADL by an independent researcher who was blinded to the study groups. A pedometer (JP-600) for each senior was used to calculate the average weekly step counts. The data were analyzed via IBM-SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics, student's t-test, paired-samples t-test, Mann Whitney-U, the Wilcoxon Sign, Friedman, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests were used to analyze the data. Cohen's d and dz formulas were used to calculate the effect sizes.

MI sessions were held every two weeks in IG. No intervention was applied in CG. Significant progress was found in the change stages of IG compared to CG. The mean of step counts was significant in favour of IG, and the effect size was d=0.641. PASE total score increased significantly in IG, and the effect size was dz=0.202.

This trial indicated that after the TTM-based MI, the change stages of the older adults improved, and their exercising behaviours promoted. In conclusion, TTM and MI are recommended to be used by the nurses toimprove healthy lifestyle behaviours in older adults, and studies to increase physical activity levels in this population should be conducted for a longer period, and studies with larger sample groups are recommended.

Read the detailed description

This randomised controlled study was carried out in a Family Health Centre (FHC) region in Turkey between April and November 2019.

The population of the study consisted of older adults aged 65 to 74 years residing in the related FHC region (n=1630). First, their records were examined, and those (n=881), who were determined to meet the inclusion criteria [19] based on these records, were called up and invited to the FHC. The sample size was calculated to be at least 90 individuals (d=0.30; 1-β=0.80; α=0.05). Considering the possibility of the participants' withdrawal from the study, all 117 older adults, who met the inclusion criteria in the population and agreed to participate, were included in the study (Intervention Group n=58; Control Group n=59). Figure 1 shows the Consort Flow Diagram of the study.

After stratifying according to age (65-69, 70-74), gender, and stage of exercise change (contemplation and pre-contemplation stage), the stratified simple randomisation procedure was used. No researcher and participant blindness were performed. The randomisation procedure was conducted via the R programming language version 3.5 (https://cran.r-project.org ) by an independent statistician to prevent selection bias. The data were collected and recorded by an independent researcher who was trained by the researcher and did not know the groups. The statistics were performed by an independent statistician.

The data were collected using the personal information form, the TTM scales (the Exercise Stages of Change Scale, the Exercise Processes of Change Scale, the Decisional BalanceScale for Exercise, and the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale), the PASE, the KATZ Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and a pedometer.

TTM-based MI and Information Guidelines for Gaining Exercise Behaviour were prepared by the researcher within the scope of the relevant literature.

The guideline was used after consulting five experts in the field of nursing who have research on TTM.

A preliminary application was conducted between September 2018 and January 2019. Filling the forms took about 30 minutes. Preliminary motivational interviews were conducted by the researcher and were recorded. Two experts supervised the records and gave feedback. The individuals who participated in the preliminary session were not included in the study.

An independent research assistant trained by the researcher collected the data in the FHC via the face-to-face interview method, and the researcher conducted motivational interviews (face-to-face and on the phone) between April and November 2019.

In the present study, an effort was made to help the IG to realize the dilemmas of individuals in the precontemplation stage about exercising, and individuals in the contemplation stage to produce their own solutions. In this direction, techniques such as decision balance, importance, and trust technique were applied, thus enabling them to reveal their feelings, thoughts, and reactions regarding the benefits/harms of doing/not doing exercise. They were supported to raise awareness about the consequences and solutions of the causes.

Face-to-face motivational interviews lasted for an average of 30 minutes. After the MI, the exercise information guideline prepared by the researcher and the TTM-based MI guideline according to the stages were given to the older adults. During the MI, a form prepared by the researcher was used to note the content of the interview. At the end of MI, the next appointment was planned. In addition, the older adults were given a chart prepared by the researcher to note their walk.

On the other hand, the phone-based motivation interviews lasted an average of five to seven minutes. Before the telephone interview, it was determined which stage of change the older adult was in. Then a motivational interview was held according to the stage.

The CG was only followed up at the beginning and end of the study, no intervention was made. The CG received standard care. Although the family health staff do not give routine and standard training about the benefits of exercising in the FHC to the elderly, they give information when necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Older Adult
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • Physical Activity
  • Nursing Caries

Keywords

  • older adult
  • motivational interviewing
  • Transtheoretical model
  • physical activity
  • nursing
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 531 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 65-74 aged seniors, who will voluntarily participate in the study
  • Seniors, at least literate or elementary school graduated
  • Seniors, at the pre-contemplation or contemplation stages of exercise behavior change
  • No cognitive impairment which affects the interpersonal communication
  • No muscle-joint problems to be a barrier for the physical activity
  • No neuropsychiatric disorder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals whose age are less than 65 and bigger than 75.
  • Seniors whose Mini Mental State Test (MMT) scores under 24 points (Mild Cognitive Impairment)
  • Seniors whose Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores above 5 points
  • Seniors diagnosed with Cancer, Insulin-dependent Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus, Uncontrolled-Hypertension, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma

Termination Criteria:

  • Termination criteria are changing in the mental status of the senior during the follow-ups, requesting for leaving the research at any stage and any situation that requires hospitalization needs of the senior.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention motivational interview group

    Face-to-face motivational interviews lasted for an average of 30 minutes. After the MI, the exercise information guideline prepared by the researcher and the TTM-based MI guideline according to the stages were given to the older adults. During the MI, a form prepared by the researcher was used to note the content of the interview. At the end of MI, the next appointment was planned. In addition, the older adults were given a chart prepared by the researcher to note their walk. On the other hand, the phone-based motivation interviews lasted an average of five to seven minutes. Before the telephone interview, it was determined which stage of change the older adult was in. Then a motivational interview was held according to the stage.

    Behavioral: Intervention motivational interview group

  • No intervention
    Control

    The Control Group (CG) was only followed up at the beginning and end of the study, no intervention was made. The CG received standard care. Although the family health staff do not give routine and standard training about the benefits of exercising in the FHC to the elderly, they give information when necessary.

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntervention motivational interview group

    Motivational interviewing (MI) a client-centered, goal-oriented method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence. Motivational interviewing is underpinned by a series of principles that emphasise a collaborative therapeutic relationship in which the autonomy of the patient is respected and the patient's intrinsic resources for change are elicited by the therapist. In the present study, an effort was made to help the IG to realize the dilemmas of individuals in the precontemplation stage about exercising, and individuals in the contemplation stage to produce their own solutions. In this direction, techniques such as decision balance, importance, and trust technique were applied, thus enabling them to reveal their feelings, thoughts, and reactions regarding the benefits/harms of doing/not doing exercise. They were supported to raise awareness about the consequences and solutions of the causes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of stages of change

    The transtheoretical model construes change as a process involving progress through a series of five stages. Precontemplation is the stage in which people are not intending to take action in the foreseeable future, usually measured as the next 6 months. Contemplation is the stage in which people are intending to change in the next 6 months. Preparation is the stage in which people are intending to take action in the immediate future, usually measured as the next month. Action is the stage in which people have made specific overt modifications in their life styles within the past 6 months. Maintenance is the stage in which people are working to prevent relapse but they do not apply change processes as frequently as do people in action. It is expected that there will be progress in the levels of stages of change exercise behaviors of the elderly who have been conducted motivational interviews based on transtheoretical model.

    Time frame: Twenty-five weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of physical activity level-Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly

    Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly was developed for the purpose of evaluating the components of physical activities involving leisure time, work-related activities, and the household. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly is a self-reported questionnaire that consists of 12 questions regarding the frequency and duration of leisure time activity, household activity, and work-related activity during the previous 7-day period. The questions are scored differently. The total Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score is computed by multiplying either the time spent in each activity (hours per week) or participation (i.e. yes or no) in an activity by empirically derived item weights and then summing the overall activities. The overall Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score ranges from 0 to 400 or more and high scores show better physical activity levels With motivational interviews, an increase is expected in Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly scores.

    Time frame: Twenty-five weeks

  2. Assessment of physical activity level-Pedometer monitoring

    Physical activity levels has been determined through Pedometer monitoring. With motivational interviews, an increase is expected the average number of weekly steps taken with a pedometer (JP-600).

    Time frame: Twenty-five weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gazi University
    Ankara, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — It has not yet been decided with the responsible investigator whether the IPD will be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04128553
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
Ebru SÖNMEZ (Principal Investigator, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2019
Start date
Apr 20, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2019
Completion
Nov 20, 2019
Last update
Aug 1, 2022

Study contacts

Yeter KİTİŞ, Prof.
study director · Gazi University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion