ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04124445Updated Jun 23, 2022

Pulsed vs Continuous Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Cervical Facet Joint Mediated Pain

An interventional study of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation in Faceto-genic Neck Pain, Shoulder Pain Chronic and Faceto-genic Headache, sponsored by Allevio Pain Management Clinic. Status unknown at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-23.

Sponsored by Allevio Pain Management Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Different studies have revealed different success rates and patient satisfaction after cervical facet C-RF. In a study on 32 patients, with 15 months follow up, 25% had complete pain relief (8). Another study had shown mean pain relief of 12.5 months and 11.5 months following a repeat procedure, with an effectiveness of 95% in 47 patients (8). In one study a success rate of 88% after first RF, and 86% following a repeat RF in 49 patients with facet mediated cervicogenic headache. They regarded the absence of anesthesia in the distribution of the 3rd occipital nerve, a technical failure (9). In a study from New Zealand, demonstrated cervical facet RF as the sole treatment modality, produced 61% -74% complete pain relief with a median duration of 15-17 months in patients who had responded to facet joints diagnostic block (10).

One more study in 2012 has demonstrated high voltage P-RF had a higher short-term effect compare to usual voltage, but results are still lower than C-RF (11). A double blind randomized prospective study has illustrated P-RF did not show any success rate in 6 months pain control, whereas C-RF had 95% pain control for trigeminal neuralgia (12).

Cohen in a recent study has compared P-RF with steroid injection for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness (13). Six weeks pain relief was 61% in P-RF group, and 36% in steroid injection group, with a positive outcome of 34%, and 26% respectively (13). One study on 2010 had reached to 52.6%, 6 months pain improvement on occipital neuralgia (14).

Read the detailed description

Patients fulfilling eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to PRF or CRF in a 1:1 ratio. The statistician will use RedCap software to generate random numbers. Patients will be registered to Redcap software and will be concealed from both patients and health care staff. The study coordinator will enter patients' consent and study eligibility information to the Redcap. Once eligible, the Redcap will assign the patient to one of the study group. Patients will be blinded in the proposed study. The assessor is the person who will assess treatment success at the end of the study based on data from completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be completed every three months by patients through RedCap System. A therapist is the person who will perform the procedure (pain specialist physician). The therapist will not be blinded, because of the nature of intervention.

Patient recruitment is estimated to be completed within 15-24 months. If the required sample size (calculated below) is recruited prior to this time, patient recruitment will be curtailed.

During the first visit the investigator will perform eligibility for neck RF and patient will be received information about the study.

Patients will be book for two MBB 4-6 weeks apart. If the patient was eligible after the second MBB, Patient will be asked to sign Informed consent before screening. Screening and recruitment, and randomization, and administer questionnaires will be performed by research co-ordinator. Study informed consent form (ICF) can be signed on the RF procedure day. If additional visits will be required to finalize the procedures related to the first visit they will be scheduled accordingly. After randomization the qualified participants will be scheduled for their RF.

For the female subjects between the age of 18-50 a pregnancy test will be asked to obtain on screening visit in order to reduce the risk of pregnancy and potential harm to fetus, unless you had previous tubal ligation, or hysterectomy. Post menopause patients are excluded.

Participants will be asked to complete the follow-up questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

LANSS questionnaire will be asked to be completed 6 weeks after RF. If the score was 12 or higher, patient will be asked to complete them every 4 weeks after till the score reduce to less than 12. LANSS will be sent to the subjects through RedCap software.

On their last study visit, participants will have an exit interview, in addition to completing study measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Faceto-genic Neck Pain
  • Shoulder Pain Chronic
  • Faceto-genic Headache

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Faceto-genic Cervical pain
  • Chronic pain
  • Pulsed Radiofrequency ablation
  • Continues Radiofrequency ablation
  • Medial Brunch Block
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,999 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 88 is above the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Allevio Pain Management Clinic is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-90;

Pain duration > 3 months

Cervical, Shoulder pain or cevicogenic Headache per Pain Diagram;

Two single blinded facet medial branch blocks (MBB) performed 30 days prior to the facet RF;

Subjects show 50% and more pain relief after each MBB (using VAS for this assessment);

Unsuccessful or poorly tolerated previous treatments including: pain control medications, chiropractic, osteopathy, massage therapy, physiotherapy, acupuncture, aqua therapy, Botox injection, and trigger point injection;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-English speakers;

Refusal to sign informed consent;

Less than 50% pain relief after MBB (using VAS);

Variation in the dose of concomitant pain control medication less than 4 weeks before the procedure;

Allergy to medication or radiology contrast;

Patients with coagulation issues, those currently using anticoagulants and didn't stop them based on Allevio clinic's policy for anticoagulants;

Pregnant patients;

Any pain interventions including previous RF, MBB, infusions 90 days prior to the first MBB for the same area (Except failed Botox injection, and trigger point injection);

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

    Radiofrequency ablation of sensory nerves at minimum 3 levels of cervical spine with Maximum allowable temperature 50° rotation: 90.; Pulse rate: 3 Hz; pulse duration: 50 ms; 3 minutes

    Procedure: Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

  • Active comparator
    Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation

    Radiofrequency ablation of sensory nerves at minimum 3 levels of cervical spine, burn will be made at 80° for 60 seconds.

    Procedure: Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedurePulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

    Radiofrequency ablation, also called rhizotomy, is a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure that uses heat to reduce or stop the transmission of pain. Radiofrequency waves ablate, or "burn," the nerve that is causing the pain, essentially eliminating the transmission of pain signals to the brain.

    Also known as: Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life measurement: Visual Analogue Scale

    Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  2. Quality of life measurement: Neck Disability Index

    Changes in the Neck Disability Index - AAOS(NDI\_AAOS)

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  3. Quality of life measurement: Short Form Brief Pain Inventory

    Changes in the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI), between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. At least 30% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 30% decrease in the pain score measured by Visual analogue Scale , between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  2. At least 30% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 30% decrease in the pain score measured by Short Form Brief Pain Inventory , between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  3. At least 30% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 30% decrease in the pain score measured by The Neck Disability Index , between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  4. At least 50% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 50% decrease in the pain score measured by The Neck Disability Index

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  5. At least 50% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 50% decrease in the pain score measured by Short Form Brief Pain Inventory , between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  6. At least 50% Changes in Pain Score

    Proportion of subjects who achieve at least a 50% decrease in the pain score measured by Visual analogue Scale , between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  7. Changes in Changes in Global Improvement and Satisfaction

    Changes in Global Improvement and Satisfaction score measured by PGIC

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  8. Changes in The Neck Disability Index

    Changes in The Neck Disability Index - AAOS(NDI\_AAOS)

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  9. Changes in General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire

    Changes in General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD)

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  10. Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory

    Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  11. Changes in Changes in Patients self-reported perceived duration of effect

    Changes in Patients self-reported perceived duration of effect (PSPDE)

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  12. Adverse events

    Safety, assessed by the number, severity and duration of adverse reactions. It will be collected as self-rated health-related complaints by the subject and then confirmed medically. The causality will be assigned by the investigator

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  13. Pain Medications

    Changes in pain medication use, if it is narcotic, measured by Morphine Equivalent Dose

    Time frame: Beginning of the study , and every 3 months up to 12 months

  14. Changes in Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs

    Changes in the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS), between minimum of zero and maximum of twenty four

    Time frame: 6 weeks after RF and if the score was 12 or higher repeat monthly up to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Allevio Pain Management Clinic
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 3S6, Canada
    • Ramin Safakish, MD. FRCPC · Contact · Ramin.Safakish@AllevioClinic.com · 6474788462
    • Shadi Babazadeh, MD · Contact · Shadi.Babazadeh@AllevioClinic.com · 6474788462
    • Ramin Safakish, MD. FRCPC · Principal investigator
    • Gil Faclier, MD. FRCPC · Sub investigator
    • Imrat Sohanpal, MD. FRCPC · Sub investigator
    • Shadi Babazadeh, MD · Sub investigator
    • Andriy Strilchuk, MD. NP · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Allevio Pain Management
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 3S6, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum, 1988.
  • Falco FJ, Erhart S, Wargo BW, Bryce DA, Atluri S, Datta S, Hayek SM. Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):323-44. PubMed 19305483 ↗
  • Yin W, Bogduk N. The nature of neck pain in a private pain clinic in the United States. Pain Med. 2008 Mar;9(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00369.x. PubMed 18298702 ↗
  • Gil Faclier, Joseph Kay. Cervical facet radiofrequency neurotomy. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management Volume 4, Issue 3, July 2000, Pages 120-125
  • Smith AD, Jull G, Schneider G, Frizzell B, Hooper RA, Sterling M. Cervical radiofrequency neurotomy reduces central hyperexcitability and improves neck movement in individuals with chronic whiplash. Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):128-41. doi: 10.1111/pme.12262. Epub 2013 Oct 18. PubMed 24138594 ↗
  • Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):959-68. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70209-1. PubMed 19747657 ↗
  • Chang MC. Effect of bipolar pulsed radiofrequency on refractory chronic cervical radicular pain: A report of two cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(15):e6604. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006604. PubMed 28403104 ↗
  • Gazelka HM, Knievel S, Mauck WD, Moeschler SM, Pingree MJ, Rho RH, Lamer TJ. Incidence of neuropathic pain after radiofrequency denervation of the third occipital nerve. J Pain Res. 2014 Apr 10;7:195-8. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S60925. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24748815 ↗
  • Husted DS, Orton D, Schofferman J, Kine G. Effectiveness of repeated radiofrequency neurotomy for cervical facet joint pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):406-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318158971f. PubMed 18679094 ↗
  • Govind J, King W, Bailey B, Bogduk N. Radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of third occipital headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):88-93. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.1.88. PubMed 12486273 ↗
  • MacVicar J, Borowczyk JM, MacVicar AM, Loughnan BM, Bogduk N. Cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy in New Zealand. Pain Med. 2012 May;13(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01351.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28. PubMed 22458772 ↗
  • Fang L, Tao W, Jingjing L, Nan J. Comparison of High-voltage- with Standard-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of Gasserian Ganglion in the Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia. Pain Pract. 2015 Sep;15(7):595-603. doi: 10.1111/papr.12227. Epub 2014 Jun 23. PubMed 24954016 ↗
  • Erdine S, Ozyalcin NS, Cimen A, Celik M, Talu GK, Disci R. Comparison of pulsed radiofrequency with conventional radiofrequency in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Pain. 2007 Apr;11(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 9. PubMed 16762570 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Peterlin BL, Fulton L, Neely ET, Kurihara C, Gupta A, Mali J, Fu DC, Jacobs MB, Plunkett AR, Verdun AJ, Stojanovic MP, Hanling S, Constantinescu O, White RL, McLean BC, Pasquina PF, Zhao Z. Randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study comparing pulsed radiofrequency to steroid injections for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2585-2594. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000373. PubMed 26447705 ↗
  • Vanelderen P, Rouwette T, De Vooght P, Puylaert M, Heylen R, Vissers K, Van Zundert J. Pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of occipital neuralgia: a prospective study with 6 months of follow-up. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):148-51. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181d24713. PubMed 20301822 ↗
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11. PubMed 18055266 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Results will be published

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 70 months after the start.

Of 1,209 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 70 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,296 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2019
First posted
Oct 11, 2019
StartActual
Feb 10, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jun 23, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04124445
Lead sponsor
Allevio Pain Management Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2019
Start date
Feb 10, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 23, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion