An interventional study of Home-based Exercise in Kidney Transplant; Complications, sponsored by University of Leicester. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.
Sponsored by University of Leicester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Although patients who have received a kidney transplant have better health than patients on dialysis, heart problems are still the commonest cause of death for kidney transplant recipients. This is because diseases like high blood pressure and diabetes are more common in patients with kidney transplants as well as factors related to having kidney disease itself and the medications transplant recipients have to take to stop them rejecting their transplanted kidney. Exercise is known to help with heart disease in lots of conditions and improves many of the risk factors known to cause heart disease in kidney transplant recipients. This study will investigate whether an individualised, home-based, exercise program improves heart disease in kidney transplant recipients. The study is a randomised controlled trial, with half the patients completing the 12 week exercise programme and the other half continuing with their normal care. The investigators will use detailed MRI scans to assess patient's hearts and blood vessels at the start and end of the study. The investigators will also assess changes in physical function, exercise capacity, blood markers of heart disease, changes in body type and quality of life measures assessed with questionnaires.
Kidney transplantation confers a significant survival advantage over remaining on dialysis, but CVD remains the leading cause of death for RTRs and of graft loss. Acute myocardial infarction accounts for 15-20% of CVD-related deaths in RTRs, but sudden cardiac death, or death from fatal arrhythmia account for at least double this number, suggesting classical atheromatous coronary artery disease driven by traditional cardiometabolic risk factors, is not the dominant driving force of CVD in RTRs. Non-traditional cardiometabolic risk factors including endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, acute rejection, anaemia and deranged bone-mineral metabolism are of at least equal importance in the pathogenesis of CVD in RTRs and drive pathological changes in cardiovascular structure and function that associate strongly with mortality. This is further illustrated by the fact that traditional CVD risk-stratification tools dramatically underestimate cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD, coronary revascularization does not improve outcomes for RTRs as it does in the general population and cardiac events are more likely to be fatal in RTRs than the general population. Immunosuppressive agents are well known to drive traditional CVD risk factors, but also drive non-traditional cardiometabolic risk factors. Cost-effective, deliverable interventions are needed to address the burden of CVD in RTRs by targeting traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Supervised exercise interventions in RTRs improve cardiorespiratory fitness and a variety of traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CVD, including metabolic profile, vascular stiffening, central adiposity and inflammatory cell and cytokine profiles, but are not realistically deliverable in the current financial climate. Home-based exercise training programs have been shown to be deliverable in patients on dialysis and patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, but the effectiveness and deliverability of home-based exercise interventions are largely untested in RTRs. It cannot be assumed such programs will be acceptable to RTRs, whose home-lives, social and occupational circumstances are significantly different to dialysis and cardiac patients. Many RTRs have had enforced sedentary lifestyles prior to transplantation as dialysis patients and their goals for rehabilitation as well as the disease processes at work are different to both dialysis and cardiac patients.
There are limited data on whether exercise-induced improvements in cardiometabolic risk translate into improvements in cardiovascular structure and function in RTRs. CMR is able to measure multiple clinically pertinent aspects of CVD processes in RTRs that relate closely to outcome with great accuracy, including:
This pilot randomised clinical trial will assess the deliverability of a combined aerobic and resistance, home-based, exercise intervention in RTRs. It will define recruitment and dropout rates from this newly designed, home-based, intervention and baseline values for CMR measures that assess prognostically important aspects of CVD in RTRs for the first time. Furthermore, it will test the effects of the intervention on traditional and novel CMR outcome measures that assess prognostically important aspects of CVD that relate directly to cardiovascular outcomes for the first time, providing estimates of effect-sizes on outcome measures. These data will be used to inform the design of a future, definitive study. This study will further the investigator's ability to make objective measures of cardiovascular health in RTRs, with the opportunity to compare CMR measures with traditional measures of cardiovascular fitness. The qualitative component of this study will refine the exercise intervention to maximize uptake in future studies and adoption into clinical practice.
4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 919 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 2,738 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.
Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →University of Leicester is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Diabetes mellitus Dyslipidaemia Hypertension History of ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease Obesity (BMI above 30)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in this arm will complete a 12 week home-based aerobic and resistance exercise training programme. There will be a 2 week period prior to this in which patients will complete up to 6 supervised sessions in order to learn about the home-based exercise training. There will be a 4 week return visit and an optional 8 week return visit in order to reassess fitness and aid the patients with any questions or queries they may have and to aid them in progressing their exercise.
Other: Home-based Exercise
In this arm patients will continue 'as normal' with daily activities. Patients in this arm will be offered the exercise intervention once they have completed post 12 week assessments.
Patients in the home-based exercise arm will complete a 12 week home-based aerobic and resistance exercise training programme. There will be a 2 week period prior to this in which patients will complete up to 6 supervised sessions in order to learn about the home-based exercise training. There will be a 4 week return visit and an optional 8 week return visit in order to reassess fitness and aid the patients with any questions or queries they may have and to aid them in progressing their exercise.
Change in Left ventricular mass (g/m)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in left/right ventricular volumes (ml)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in ejection fractions (%)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in native and post-contrast T1 mapping time (ms)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Myocardial systolic-strain (%)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in peak early-diastolic strain rate (%s-1)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Aortic pulse wave velocity (m/s)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in aortic distensibility (mmHg-1×10-3)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Myocardial and hepatic triglyceride content (%)
Measured using multi-parametric cardiac MRI (CMR)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Recruitment Rate
The feasibility of recruitment and interest of patients is an essential component of whether a full trial is feasible. The number of eligible patients and number of consented will be recorded. Monthly recruitment rate and the time taken to recruit 10 (25%), 20 (50%), 30 (75%), and 40 (100%) patients will be recorded.
Time frame: Post 12 week intervention
Number of participants lost to follow up
This is the number of participants leaving the trial due to being uncontactable
Time frame: Post 12 week intervention
Number of exercise sessions completed per week
This will assess adherence to the intervention
Time frame: Post 12 week intervention
Number of participants dropping out of the trial
Otherwise known as the attrition rate
Time frame: Post 12 week intervention
Number of adverse events
This is a measure of the trial safety
Time frame: Post 12 week intervention
Aerobic Capacity (change)
Measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test which produces V02 (maximal oxygen uptake) in both l/min and ml/kg/min. This is a measure of a participants aerobic capacity.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Timed up and go test (TUAG)(change)
To determine fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking. Patient sits and then the time taken to stand up and walk 3 meters and return is measured. If a patient took 14 seconds or longer he or she was classified as high-risk for falling
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Habitual Physical Activity (change)
Via accelerometry
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Lower limb strength (change)
Dynamometry
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Upper Limb Strength (change)
Hand grip
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in circulation markers of systemic inflammation
Blood Sampling including but not limited to IL-6, CRP, IL-10, TNF-Alpha
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Muscle quality using Ultrasound Imaging (change)
Cross-sectional area (cm2)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Muscle quality using Ultrasound Imaging (change)
fat thickness (mm)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Muscle Elasticity (change)
Muscle elasticity will be measures using a MyotonPro device
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Lower limb endurance (change)
Sit to stand 60 test measuring how many 'sit to stands' can be performed in 60 seconds
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Balance (change)
Measured using a 'wii-fit' style board. Better balance is an idicator of falls risk
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Gait speed (change)
Gait speed is measure as the time taken to walk 4 meters. Slower speeds have been linked to higher mortality risk
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Height
Height measured in meters
Time frame: Baseline
Weight (change)
Weight measured in kg
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Body fat % (change)
Body fat measured using bio electrical impedance analysis
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Renal (I-POS-Renal)(change)
IPOS-Renal is a short measure (11 questions), combining the most common symptoms renal patients experience plus additional items from IPOS on concerns beyond symptoms, such as information needs, practical issues, family anxiety. IPOS has been validated in a mixed population of those with cancer and non-cancer diagnosis, including renal patients, and shows good content and construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Each symptom is rated on a scale of 0-4 for how much that symptom effects the participant. 0 is not at all and 4 is severely. Higher total scores indicate more symptom burden.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)(change)
Categorical questions that assess limitations in role functioning as a result of physical and emotional health. The survey also contains Likert response formats including those that are on a three-point scale (e.g., limited a lot, limited a little, or not limited at all) that assess limitations in physical activity and physical role functioning. A five-point scale (e.g., not at all, a little bit, moderately, quite a bit, and extremely) that assesses pain, and a five-point scale that assesses overall health (excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor) are included. The SF-12 also contains a six-point scale (e.g., all of the time, most of the time, a good bit of the time, some of the time, a little of the time, and none of the time) that assesses mental health, vitality, and social functioning. Two summary scores: mental health (MCS12), and physical health (PCS12). The scores are represented as t-scores that are linear transformations with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)(Change)
Individuals are asked to complete a short survey and based on their responses, they receive a PAM score (between 0 and 100). The resulting score places the individual at one of four levels of activation, each of which reveals insight into a range of health-related characteristics, including behaviours and outcomes. The four levels of activation are: Level 1: Individuals tend to be passive and feel overwhelmed by managing their own health. They may not understand their role in the care process. Level 2: Individuals may lack the knowledge and confidence to manage their health. Level 3: Individuals appear to be taking action but may still lack the confidence and skill to support their behaviours. Level 4: Individuals have adopted many of the behaviours needed to support their health but may not be able to maintain them in the face of life stressors. Particulars of the scoring system (and scales) are not disclosed by the license holder
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
(FACIT-F)(change)
The FACIT-fatigue scale is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue with a 7-day recall period. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. Items are reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatigue
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)(change)
In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Leicester