CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04122768Updated Feb 13, 2024

Activity Coaching in Patients Post Lung Transplantation

An interventional study of Multi-component physical activity tele coaching intervention and Light coaching intervention in Lung Transplantation, sponsored by KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-13.

Sponsored by KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lung transplantation is an ultimate, effective treatment option for selected patients with end stage lung disease, improving quality of life and extending survival. Because of the improved survival during the last decades, enhancing the long term condition after lung transplantation has now become a focus for disease management.

The co-presence of non-communicable diseases is common and poses new challenges to disease management. These comorbidities have been related to physical activity in the healthy population. As in other chronic respiratory disease, physical inactivity is a common feature of patients after LTX. Despite near normal lung function, exercise intolerance and physical inactivity persist up to years after the transplantation. Literature on effective interventions to increase physical activity are scarce in this population.

Therefore, the present project aims to test the effectiveness of a tele coaching program to enhance physical activity and to analyze the association between physical activity and long-term health benefits in this population at risk. These research questions will be answered based on a randomized controlled trial. Patients that are active at baseline will be followed up in a cohort study.

Read the detailed description

The aims of the present study are:

  1. primary objective: To test the effectiveness of adding a semi-automated tele coaching intervention to enhance physical activity in patients after a first double lung transplantation, assessed at 12 weeks.
  1. Secondary objectives:
  1. To test the long term effect of a semi-automated tele coaching intervention on physical activity, assessed at 52 weeks.
  2. To analyze the association between baseline physical activity, the change in physical activity and long term health benefits in this population at risk
  3. To relate the day-by-day pattern of physical activity to changes in the health status of patients.
  4. To investigate the patient's experience with the delivered intervention.

Therefore, the study will include stable patients at least 6 months and maximum 4 years after a first double lung transplantation. Based on a 1 week physical activity assessment, patients will be classified as active (mean steps >7500 steps) or inactive (mean steps \< 7500). Inactive patients will be entered in a randomized controlled trial, using block randomization. Active patients will be followed for 1 year in a cohort study.

The study consists of a total of 3 (active patients) or 4 (inactive patients) clinical visits:

  • Visit 1 screening visit (all patients)
  • Visit 2: randomisation visit, scheduled 1-2 weeks after visit 1 (all patients)
  • Visit 3: short term follow up, scheduled 12 weeks after visit 2. T(only in patients who have been randomized)
  • Visit 4: long term follow up, scheduled 52 weeks after visit 2. (all patients)

Active patients will be measured again 52 weeks after visit 2. They will not receive any intervention during the 1 year follow up. Patients who enter the randomized controlled trial will either receive

  • A mulitcomponent tele coaching intervention that consists of 1) education about the importance of physical activity and a one-to-one interview with the coach discussing motivation and barriers to be active, 2) a step counter providing direct feedback, 3) application installed on a smartphone providing an adaptive goal and daily and weekly feedback and 4) contact with the coach if the patient is not compliant with the intervention, not increasing physical activity or when the patient reports a change in medication. The patient is asked to have a daily interaction with the smartphone application.
  • A sham intervention that consist of 1) education about the importance of physical activity and a personal (fixed) goal expressed in terms of steps. The patient is asked to try to reach this goal, 2) a step counter providing direct feedback, 3) application installed on a smartphone only displaying a graph with the activity of the present week and the personal (fixed) goal, 4) contact with the coach if the patient reports a change in medication. The patient is asked to have at least a weekly interaction with the application.
02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Transplantation

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • tele coaching
  • comorbidities
03

In context

Lead sponsor

KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Stable patients at least 6 months and maximum 4 years after the first double lung transplantation
  2. Older than 30 years
  3. Understand and able to work with the smartphone application, as judged by the investigator

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis
  2. Musculoskeletal problems not allowing a normal gait pattern
  3. Receiving a multi-organ transplantation or previously undergoing a solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation
  4. Chronic rejection of the allograft before inclusion
  5. Having a life expectancy \<1year
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tele coaching group

    Coaching with daily interaction with the coaching application, based on an adaptive physical activity goal

    Behavioral: Multi-component physical activity tele coaching intervention

  • Sham comparator
    Sham coaching group

    Coaching with fixed physical activity goal and limited interaction with the smartphone application.

    Behavioral: Light coaching intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralMulti-component physical activity tele coaching intervention

    A.Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the coach motivation, self-efficacy, barriers, favorite activities and strategies to become more active are discussed. B. Step counter providing direct feedback. C.A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application provides automated coaching by displaying an activity goal (number of steps) and feedback on a daily basis. The feedback comes with a graphical presentation. Patients' targets are automatically revised weekly. The aim is to progressively increase the PA during the 12 weeks period and maintain afterwards. D.Telephone contacts triggered in the case of non-compliance with wearing the step counter, failure to transmit data or failure to progress. Coaches are alerted by a note at the coaches' backend to take contact with the patient if needed.

  • BehavioralLight coaching intervention

    A. Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the investigator, patients will receive a personal goal (expressed in steps/day), based on their individual exercise capacity. B.A step counter providing direct feedback. C.A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application receives the step data of the patient and asks on a weekly basis about the patient's change in medication. The application does provide a graph showing the steps the patient took and presents a general activity plan including their personal goal (which stays the same throughout the entire intervention period).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily number of steps at 12 weeks (short term effect)

    Change in daily mean step count 12 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of responders

    Proportion of patients showing an increase of at least 1000 steps. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  2. Daily number of steps at 52 weeks (long term effect)

    Change in daily mean step count 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  3. Exercise capacity

    Change in six-minutes walk distance 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. The six-minute walking test will be performed with standardized encouragement to assess patients' functional exercise capacity. The best of two measurements will be used.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  4. Quadriceps force

    Change in isometric quadriceps force 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. The quadriceps isometric strength will be evaluated by a maximal voluntary contraction using the Biodex, a computerized dynamometer. Patients will be seated with a 90° hip and 60° knee flexion. The best of 3 measurements will be taken into analysis as the maximal force capacity of the lower limb.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  5. Health related quality of life

    Change in quality of life 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Health related quality of life will be measured by the extensively validated generic HRQoL questionnaire, the SF-36. This questionnaire includes two main scores with a physical component and an emotional component scale and eight subscales.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  6. Symptoms of anxiety and depression

    Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Symptoms of anxiety and depression will be measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs). The HADs is a generic screening measure of symptoms of anxiety and depression. The HADS is a 14 item measure comprising 7 anxiety items and 7 depression items from which separate anxiety and depression sub-scale scores are calculated.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  7. Symptoms of fatigue

    Change in symptoms of fatigue 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Fatigue will assessed using the subscale fatigue of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS). The subscale consists of 8 items. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale. The total score ranging from 8 to 56 is calculated. Significant fatigue is defined as a score of 35 or higher on the CIS fatigue.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  8. Time spent in at least moderate intense activity

    Change in daily time spent in at least moderate intense activity 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  9. Mean walking time per day

    Change in mean daily walking time 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks

  10. Metabolic syndrome

    Prevalence of abdominal obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes (and combined in the metabolic syndrome). Abdominal obesity will be assessed by waist and hip circumference, hypertension will be assessed by 2 tests of blood pressure with at least 5 minutes interval, hyperlipidemia and diabetes will be assessed based on a fasted blood sample.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  11. Lipid profile

    Serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL and LDL) based on a fasted blood sample

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  12. blood pressure

    Blood pressure will be assessed twice with at least 5 minutes interval

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  13. ankle brachial index

    Peripheral vascular disease will be assessed by the ankle brachial index as the ratio between the blood pressure in the arms and the blood pressure in the lower legs.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  14. Body mass index

    Calculated as the ratio between weight and height (squared)

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  15. Body composition

    Fat free and fat mass based on DEXA scan

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  16. Waist and hip circumference

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  17. HOMA IR

    Calculated based on glucose and insuline levels measured during a fasted blood sample

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  18. HbA1c

    HbA1c based on fasted blood sample

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  19. bone mineral density

    Bone mineral density measured by DEXA scan

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  20. Systemic inflammation

    CRP based on a blood sample.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  21. vitamin D level

    vitamin D levels based on a blood sample.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  22. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (only in patients 6-9 months post transplantation)

    Maximal exercise capacity will be assessed by a maximal incremental cycling test (Ergometrics 900, Ergoline, Bitz, Germany). After a 2-min resting period and 3 minutes of unloaded cycling, the patients will start at 20 W and cycle until symptom limitation at an incremental workload of 10 W/min. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide output and ventilation will be measured breath by breath (Vmax series, SensorMedics, Anaheim, CA). Heart rate and oxygen saturation will be registered continuously.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • KULeuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04122768
Lead sponsor
KU Leuven
Responsible party
Thierry Troosters (Professor, KU Leuven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2019
Start date
Nov 6, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 7, 2023
Completion
Sep 7, 2023
Last update
Feb 13, 2024

Study contacts

Thierry Troosters, Prof
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Heleen Demeyer, Dr
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Wim Janssens, Prof
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Robin Vos, Prof
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Daniel Langer, Prof
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Geert Verleden, Prof
principal investigator · KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion