An observational study in Lumbar Arthrodesis, sponsored by Ramsay Générale de Santé. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-03.
Sponsored by Ramsay Générale de Santé · Observational
To compare the functional results through the improvement of the Oswestry medium-term score of the lumbar arthrodesis performed to treat patients with lumbago and/or lumbar-radicular pain due to degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine: degenerative disc disease, osteoarthritis spondylolisthesis or adult dislocation scoliosis.
Lower back pain is the leading cause of disability in France for adults under 45 years of age. It is also the leading cause of work stoppage and reported occupational illnesses. Thus, the degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine can be at the origin of a severe handicap resistant to well-conducted medical treatment. This is particularly the case for degenerative disc disease, osteoarthritic spondylolisthesis and scoliotic dislocations in adults.
If lumbar arthrodesis is a recognised solution in the surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine when they become disabling despite medical treatment, the choice of the operative technique and approach used to achieve it is more dependent of the training that the practitioner benefited from than the guidelines derived from published prospective comparative scientific studies comparing the results of different surgical solutions.
Our hypothesis is that the functional and radiographic results of anterior lumbar arthrodesis techniques by minimally invasive approach may differ from those of conventional posterolateral arthrodesis.
We propose to compare the results of these two surgical techniques within the orthopedic and neurosurgeon team of the Institut Parisien du Dos, mastering these two approaches optimally by leaving them free to use them as they do daily without modifying their procedures. This should allow us to judge, in a well-defined population, whether one of the two techniques is superior to the other when performed by surgeons who are experienced in this surgery.
Ramsay Générale de Santé is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients with a degenerative lumbar pathology operated
Patient responding on one anatomical level* to one of the following diagnoses:
Exclusion Criteria:
Lumbar arthrodesis performed by a posterior spinal approach.
Procedure: lumbar arthrodesis
Lumbar arthrodesis performed by a anterior spinal approach.
Procedure: lumbar arthrodesis
two approaches anterior versus posterior, optimally by leaving physicians free to use them as they do daily without modifying their procedures
Oswestry medium-term score
The absolute value and improvement of the Oswestry score at 1 year compared to the preoperative score for the 2 populations of lumbar arthrodesis by anterior or posterior approach.
Time frame: 12 months
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ramsay Générale de Santé