ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04114175Updated Aug 29, 2023

Spinal Stabilization Exercises in Individuals With Transtibial Amputatıon

An interventional study of Exercise BE and Exercise BE+SS in Amputees, Exercise Training and Physiotherapy, sponsored by Baskent University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-29.

Sponsored by Baskent University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lower extremity amputation causes rapid changes in musculoskeletal system. With the effect of these changes, the energy requirement for prosthetic ambulance is much higher than normal ambulance. Although methods such as the reduction of the segmental load of the prosthesis and the preference of the different prosthetic components for energy expenditure have been emphasized, the effect of exercise types has not been investigated in our knowledge. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of spinal (Core) stabilization exercises on energy expenditure in combination with the classical physiotherapy program in patients with unilateral transtibial amputation. Individuals with transtibial amputation included in the study will be randomly divided into two groups. In group 1, basic exercises related to amputation will be applied for 8 weeks and in group 2 basic exercises with spinal stabilization exercises will be applied to the individuals. At the beginning and at the end of the exercise intervention, energy expenditure and exercise capacity will be evaluated by a portable exercise test device during '6 Minutes Step Test'; fatigue assessment will be done before and after 6 Minutes Step Test with 'Modified Borg Scale'; the strength of deep spinal muscles will be evaluated with 'Stabilizer'; dynamic balance and functional mobility will be evaluated by 'Timed Up \& Go' Test; and the effect of the prosthesis on mobility will be evaluated by the sub-scale 'Mobility' of 'Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire'.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputees
  • Exercise Training
  • Physiotherapy
  • Energy Metabolism

Keywords

  • amputees
  • rehabilitation
  • energy expenditure
  • deep muscles of the back
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Baskent University is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having unilateral transtibial amputation of at least 6 months in which the stump volume becomes stable,
  • Being prosthetic users (For homogenization of the groups in terms of external support used, individuals with transitibial amputation included in the study should use total contact socket and carbon foot prosthesis systems - Pin System, Passive Vacuum System or Active Vacuum System),
  • Having at least "four" quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength in the amputated limb according to Lovett's manual muscle test method.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any disadvantage about prosthetic device usage in terms of stump length, shape and edema,
  • Having movement limitation,
  • Having phantom pain in the stump,
  • Having any discomfort or health problem (cardiopulmonary, neurological or orthopedic problems) that may affect gait other than amputation,
  • Having multiple extremity loss.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    People with unilateral transtibial amputation. Participants will be provided from the sample group according to the randomization.

    Other: Exercise BE

  • Experimental
    Spinal Stabilization Group

    People with unilateral transtibial amputation. Participants will be provided from the sample group according to the randomization.

    Other: Exercise BE+SS

Interventions

  • OtherExercise BE

    Basic exercises related to amputation will be applied

  • OtherExercise BE+SS

    Basic exercises related to amputation + Spinal stabilization exercises will be applied

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Energy expenditure and exercise capacity

    Assessement will be with the exercise tester (COSMED, Fitmate Pro, Rome, Italy) during the 6 Minute Step Test .

    Time frame: 6 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fatigue

    Assessement will be with "Modified Borg Scale" after 6 Minute Step Test. Pariticipants were shown the Modified Borg Scale, which is a vertical scale from 0 to 10 in which numbers are anchored with corresponding verbal expressions of progressively increasing intensity. The patients were asked to rate their fatigue by selecting the number with the corresponding words that most appropriately described their sensation of fatigue. The minimum value that can be obtained as a result of the evaluation is 0 (Nothing at all), the maximum value is 10 (Maximal).

    Time frame: 20 seconds

  2. Strength of deep spinal muscles

    Assessement will be with "Stabilizer".

    Time frame: 3 minutes

  3. Mobility

    Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was designed as a self-report visual analog scale style questionnaire with scores expressed in millimeters (0-100 mm). PEQ was previously translated to Turkish language, and it was proven to be valid and reliable. The questions of the PEQ are organized into nine functional domain scales, each reflecting a major area of concern for persons with amputations, such as "mobility". Each domain scale can be used and scored independent of the others. All subscales are scored between 0 and 100 (for example, in mobility subscale higher scores indicate higher mobility). In mobility subscale there are 13 questions. The minimum value that can be obtained as a result of the evaluation is 0 (minimum mobility), the maximum value is 130 (maximum mobility).

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Baskent University
    Ankara, Etimesgut 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04114175
Lead sponsor
Baskent University
Responsible party
Senay Cerezci Duygu (Research Assistant, Baskent University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 3, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2021
Completion
Oct 1, 2021
Last update
Aug 29, 2023

Study contacts

Fatih Erbahceci, Prof
study chair · Hacettepe University
Senay Cerezci Duygu, MSc
study director · Baskent University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion