CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04110522Updated May 14, 2026

Psoriatic Arthritis D2P Screening

An interventional study of Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire in Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Jessica Walsh. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-14.

Sponsored by Jessica Walsh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overarching goal of this study is to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that will improve early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) detection in patients with psoriasis. Previously developed screening questionnaires were intended for use in the setting of a doctor's office to assist providers with referral decisions. However, these screening questionnaires are infrequently used in routine practice because of limitations with time and resources. The study will aim to develop a practical screening strategy that does not require involvement from dermatologists (or other non-rheumatology providers) and can systematically reach a broad range of psoriasis patients, including patients not attending dermatology clinics. The researchers hypothesize that disseminating questionnaires directly to patients outside of a clinic setting (direct-to-patient approach) will educate patients about their PsA risk and improve early PsA diagnoses.

Read the detailed description

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems will be used to identify psoriasis patients without a PsA diagnosis. Patients will be randomized to receive a PsA screening questionnaire (intervention group) or not receive a questionnaire (control group). Rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses will be compared between the groups, using EMRs to longitudinally track outcomes.

Intervention group patients who through the completion of the PsA Screening questionnaire positively self-screen for an elevated PsA risk will either be randomly invited to directly access a rheumatology appointment or instructed to talk with their doctor about a rheumatology referral. We will compare rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses between these groups to identify the best method for accessing rheumatology appointments.

To determine if PsA patients diagnosed after receiving a screening questionnaire differ from patients diagnosed via usual care; investigators will examine disease duration, severity, and comorbidities in patients receiving and not receiving the screening questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

  • Psoriasis
03

In context

Arthritis, Psoriatic

579 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18,000 is above the median of 135 across 322 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic.

Browse Arthritis, Psoriatic studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jessica Walsh as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code diagnosis of psoriasis but without a confirmed diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis prior to study initiation
  • Be age 18 or older
  • Be geographically located within a reasonable proximity to the Rheumatology study site

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have psoriasis and a confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis made or confirmed by a rheumatologist
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist

    Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions on how to directly schedule a rheumatologic evaluation

    Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire

  • Experimental
    Intervention with Standard of Care Referral

    Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions to talk with their doctor about a referral to a rheumatologist

    Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire

  • No intervention
    Control

    Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to not receive an intervention PsA questionnaire

Interventions

  • OtherDirect to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire

    Patients randomized to an intervention group will be asked to complete and score the 5-item Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire. Those patients with an elevated score (PEST ≥3 out of 5) will be advised to complete a rheumatologic evaluation for PsA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with a new PsA diagnosis

    The percentage of psoriasis patients with a new diagnosis of PsA will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Symptom duration

    Average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) will be compared to the average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Control Arm

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation

    The percentage of psoriasis patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Time to initial PsA diagnosis after questionnaire dissemination

    The average time to PsA diagnosis after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Time to rheumatologic evaluation after questionnaire dissemination

    The average time to rheumatologic evaluation after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Severity of PsA Disability

    Average work disability in PsA, as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental ams (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Physical function level in PsA

    Average physical function level in PsA, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Severity of PsA radiographic damage

    Average number of psoriatic arthritis inflammatory changes per rheumatology provider's judgement after review of all relevant available imaging data using scale of yes/no/unsure will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. PsA Activity by Joint Count

    Average number of swollen/tender joints in PsA using the 66/68 joint count assessment by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. PsA Activity by Enthesitis

    Average number of joint insertions with enthesitis in PsA as determined by the Leeds enthesitis index as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. PsA Activity by Dactilitis Count

    Average number of digits with dactylitis in PsA using a dactylitis count (yes/no for each finger or toe) as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04110522
Lead sponsor
Jessica Walsh
Responsible party
Jessica Walsh (Assistant Professor, Rheumatology, University of Utah) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
Start date
Jul 22, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2026

Study contacts

Jessica Walsh, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Utah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion