ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04110340IMASOYUpdated Mar 6, 2025

Ciprofloxacin Versus an Aminoglycoside Followed by Ciprofloxacin for Bubonic Plague

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ciprofloxacin and Streptomycin in Plague, Bubonic and Plague, Pneumonic, sponsored by University of Oxford. Completed at 1 site in Madagascar. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
222
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this trial is to test the hypothesis that ciprofloxacin monotherapy given (orally, intravenously, or combination) for 10 days is non-inferior to an aminoglycoside (given on days 1-3) followed by ciprofloxacin (given on days 4-10) in the treatment of bubonic plague.

Secondary objectives are:

  • to evaluate the level and kinetics of anti-Y. pestis antibodies of patients (bubonic and pneumonic plague) included in the study (anti-F1 ELISA techniques) at D1, D11, D21, M3 for patients who are positive at D21, and M12 for patients who are positive at M3.

The tertiary objectives are:

  • to evaluate the level and kinetics of the levels of anti-Y. pestis antibodies and circulating F1 antigen of the patients (bubonic and pneumonic plague) included in the study (Luminex MagPix techniques with a Multiplex containing anti-F1 and rLcrV antigens and an F1 antigen capture multiplex) at D1, D11, D21, M3 for patients positive at D21, and M12 for patients who are positive at M3.

Observational non-comparative study of pneumonic plague

  • The primary objective is to document the efficacy and safety of the currently recommended combination therapy treatment of pneumonic plague - an aminoglycoside (streptomycin or gentamicin) and ciprofloxacin combination therapy.
  • The secondary and tertiary objectives of the bubonic plague trial also apply to the pneumonic plague cohort.
Read the detailed description

An individually randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial of ciprofloxacin versus an aminoglycoside and ciprofloxacin in patients with bubonic plague. We are using a non-inferiority design since the overall cure rate for bubonic plague without septicaemia with streptomycin is approximately 95%. As a result, demonstrating superiority would be unnecessary and impractical given the sample size that would be required. Our aim is therefore to demonstrate that ciprofloxacin alone is not more than 15% inferior to an aminoglycoside followed by ciprofloxacin. (15% is the non-inferiority margin in our study). We will recruit patients with a clinical suspicion of bubonic plague, but the size of our sample is powered based on an intention to treat infected patients sample size of 190, where infected is defined as a confirmed or probable case of bubonic plague. As a result the total number of patients to be enrolled will be higher than 190. We estimate that we will need to recruit approximately 600 patients with bubonic plague to achieve a sample size of 190 confirmed/probable bubonic plague patients. However, to mitigate risks of being under-powered we will propose to recruit for three full seasons with a minimum target of 190 confirmed/probable cases. Should we achieve the target of 190 confirmed/probable bubonic plague cases before the end of the final transmission season, we will nevertheless continue to recruit until the end of the season to retain power in the event of different treatment success percentages and to allow us to increase precision.

We will also recruit and collect data on patients with pneumonic plague, who will be enrolled in to a parallel observational cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plague, Bubonic
  • Plague, Pneumonic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 812 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for randomisation to the bubonic plague treatment trial:

Bubonic plague

  • Patients of any age AND
  • Recent onset (\< 10 days) of fever (uncorrected axillary temperature ≥ 37.5C) or history of fever AND
  • One or more buboes (tender lymph node swelling) AND
  • Residence or travel to a plague endemic area in Madagascar within 14 days of the onset of symptoms AND
  • Patients identified as clinically suspected of plague by health personnel (doctors or paramedics)

Exclusion Criteria to the bubonic plague treatment trial:

  • Known allergy to aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones
  • Tendinitis
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Theophylline or warfarin use
  • Already treated for bubonic or pneumonic plague in the preceeding 3 months
  • Women who report being pregnant

Inclusion of patients to the pneumonic plague observational cohort:

  • Suspected, probable and confirmed cases of pneumonic plague
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
222 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Ciprofloxacin Arm

    Adults: Ciprofloxacin 500mg orally twice daily (or 400mg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral medication) for 10 days; Children:Ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg twice daily (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral - maximum dose 400mg) for 10 days.

    Drug: Ciprofloxacin

  • Other
    Control arm

    Adults: streptomycin 1g twice daily for three days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500mg orally twice daily (or ciprofloxacin 400mg twice daily by IV for those who cannot take it orally) for an additional 7 days. OR 2.5mg/kg IV gentamicin twice daily for 3 days followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily (or ciprofloxacin 400 mg twice daily IV for those who cannot take oral) for a further 7 days. Children: streptomycin 15mg/kg twice daily for three days followed by ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg twice daily (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral - maximum dose 400mg) for 7 additional days. OR 2.5mg/kg IV gentamicin twice daily for 3 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take the oral route) for a further 7 days.

    Drug: Ciprofloxacin · Drug: Streptomycin · Drug: Gentamicin

Interventions

  • Adults: Ciprofloxacin 500mg orally twice daily (or 400mg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral medication) for 10 days; Children:Ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg twice daily (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral - maximum dose 400mg) for 10 days. Patients who begin intravenous therapy may switch to oral administration once they are able to swallow or once deemed clinically appropriate by the treating physician.

  • DrugStreptomycin

    Adults: streptomycin 1g twice daily for three days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500mg orally twice daily (or ciprofloxacin 400mg twice daily by IV for those unable to take orally) for an additional 7 days. Children: streptomycin 15mg/kg twice daily for three days followed by ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg twice daily (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take oral - maximum dose 400mg) for 7 additional days. Patients who begin intravenous therapy may switch to oral administration once they are able to swallow or once deemed clinically appropriate by the treating physician.

  • Adults: 2.5mg/kg IV gentamicin twice daily for 3 days followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily (or ciprofloxacin 400 mg twice daily IV for those who cannot take oral) for a further 7 days. Children: 2.5mg/kg IV gentamicin twice daily for 3 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 15mg/kg (max 500mg per dose) orally (or 10mg/kg IV twice daily for those who cannot take the oral route) for a further 7 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with bubonic plague with a therapeutic response (assessed on day 11).Therapeutic response is defined as follows for subjects with a visible bubo:

    * Alive * Absence of fever * Has not received alternative treatment for plague * No clinical decision to continue anti-plague antibiotics beyond day 10

    Time frame: 11 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients without fever (uncorrected axillary temperature \<37.5C) at Day 4

    Time frame: 4 days

  2. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients with a pain score \< 3 at Day 4 (using pain scale questionnaires)

    Time frame: 4 days

  3. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients with a pain score \< 3 at Day 11 (using pain scale questionnaires)

    Time frame: 11 days

  4. Bubonic plague

    • Mean % change in bubo size at Day 4 (measured by use of calipers and/or ultrasound)

    Time frame: 4 days

  5. Bubonic plague

    • Mean % change in bubo size at Day11 (measured by use of calipers and/or ultrasound)

    Time frame: 11 days

  6. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 4

    Time frame: 4 days

  7. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 11

    Time frame: 11 days

  8. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 21

    Time frame: 21 days

  9. Bubonic plague

    • Proportion of patients who are fully adherent to the study treatment schedule.

    Time frame: 21 days

  10. Pneumonic plague

    Proportion of patients with a therapeutic response at Day 11. Therapeutic response is defined as follows: * Alive * Resolution of fever (uncorrected axillary temperature \<37.5C) * Resolution of tachypnoea (RR\< 24 in adults, but age-specific in children)

    Time frame: 11 days

  11. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients without fever (uncorrected axillary temperature \<37.5C) at Day 4

    Time frame: 4 days

  12. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients with tachypnoea resolution (RR\< 24 in adults, but age-specific in children) at Day 4

    Time frame: 4 days

  13. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 4

    Time frame: 4 days

  14. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 11

    Time frame: 11 days

  15. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients experiencing a serious adverse event on or before Day 21

    Time frame: 21 days

  16. Pneumonic plague

    • Proportion of patients who are fully adherent to the study treatment schedule.

    Time frame: 21 days

  17. Therapeutic response is defined as follows for subjects with a visible bubo:

    * Alive AND * Absence of fever at D11 AND * At least a 25% decrease in bubo size (in the case of multiple buboes, the largest bubo) AND * Has not received alternative treatment for plague AND * No clinical decision to continue anti-plague antibiotics beyond day 10 ● Therapeutic response is defined as follows for subjects with small buboes that are palpable but not measurable: * Alive AND * Absence of fever at D11 AND * Bubo has not enlarged AND * Has not received alternative treatment for plague AND * No clinical decision to continue anti-plague antibiotics beyond day 10

    Time frame: 11 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Professor Mamy Randria
    Antananarivo, Madagascar
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Randremanana RV, Raberahona M, Randria MJD, Rajerison M, Andrianaivoarimanana V, Legrand A, Rasoanaivo TF, Randriamparany R, Mayouya-Gamana T, Mangahasimbola R, Bourner J, Salam A, Gillesen A, Edwards T, Schoenhals M, Baril L, Horby P, Olliaro P. An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial of the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin versus streptomycin + ciprofloxacin in the treatment of bubonic plague (IMASOY): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04642-2. PubMed 32807214 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymised data relating to the published analyses will be made available through an existing online repository (either at the University of Oxford or LSHTM) once the trial results are published.

Time frame: Anticipated release date: May 2025

Access criteria: To be confirmed

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04110340
Collaborators
Hôpital Universitaire Joseph Raseta Befelatanana CHU d'Antananarivo, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Wellcome (216273.Z.19.Z)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
Start date
Feb 15, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
Feb 5, 2025
Last update
Mar 6, 2025

Study contacts

Peter W Horby, MD
principal investigator · University of Oxford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion