ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04109352SBT4EEUpdated Oct 6, 2021

Labelled Carbon Sucrose Breath Test (13C-SBT) as a Marker of Environmental Enteropathy

An observational study in Glucose-Galactose Malabsorption, Enteropathy and Malnutrition, Child, sponsored by University of Virginia. Status unknown at 9 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 15 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-06.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600
Ages
12 Months to 15 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Linear growth failure, a manifestation of chronic undernutrition in early childhood, is a recalcitrant problem in resource constrained settings. The underlying causes of growth failure are multifactorial, but persistent and recurrent infection and inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and immune activation, a condition commonly referred to as environmental enteropathy, is an important contributor. A highly enriched 13C-Sucrose Breath Test, a measure of sucrase-isomaltase activity, will be evaluated as a non-invasive biomarker of environmental enteropathy, and more specifically of intestinal brush border enzyme activity in 6 resource poor countries (Bangladesh, India, Jamaica, Kenya, Peru and Zambia) in 100 volunteers aged 12-15 months (total n=600) and evaluated relative to the lactose rhamnose test and linear and ponderal growth over a 3-6 month period following biomarker assessment. Field usability will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Environmental enteropathy is associated with linear and ponderal growth shortfalls in young children in resource constrained settings. However, the physiological alterations of intestinal function that accompany both the demonstrable evidence of inflammation and architectural changes seen in biopsies from effected children have yet to be elucidated, and this knowledge gap limits the development of effective strategies to optimally manage the condition. Furthermore, a limited number of non-invasive assays exist with which to assess the presence of environmental enteropathy in low resource settings. This study aims 1) to determine if sucrose-isomaltase enzyme is altered in children with environmental enteropathy by using a 13C-Sucrose breath test 2) to determine if the test is able to be employed in resource limited settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glucose-Galactose Malabsorption
  • Enteropathy
  • Malnutrition, Child
  • Intestinal Permeability
  • Linear Growth Failure
03

In context

Intestinal Diseases

260 studies on the registry are indexed under Intestinal Diseases; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 236 across 74 observational studies indexed under Intestinal Diseases.

Browse Intestinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 675 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Of its 61 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 15 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Because of exigent test requirements enrollment will be restricted to convenience samples from populations near centers of excellence in nutritional studies in Dhaka, Bangladesh (the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research); Bangalore, India (St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences); Kingston, Jamaica (The Tropical Metabolism Research Unit of the Caribbean Institute for Health Research, University of West Indies); Kakamega, Kenya (Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology); Iquitos, Peru44 (Asociación Benefica PRISMA and the University of Virginia); and Ndola, Zambia (Tropical Disease Research Centre). These sites represent a range of epidemiologic contexts which will enhance the cross-context applicability of study results.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All children will be recruited and enrolled through convenience sampling, either at the community level (if the study site has previously censused the community) or through child clinic visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe acute malnutrition
  2. positive
  3. Weight for height Z >+2
  4. Known medical illness contributing to growth failure
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of SBT to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-% dose 90 min

    The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to LR ratio (the ratio of the percent recovery of administered lactulose and mannitol)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  2. Comparison of SBT to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test- time to 50% recovery

    The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes ) will be compared to LR ratio (the ratio of the percent recovery of administered lactulose and mannitol)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  3. Correlation of SBT (% recovery at 90 minutes) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Lactulose recovery

    The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to the percent lactulose recovery at 90 minutes post administration

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  4. Correlation of SBT (time to 50% recovery) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Lactulose recovery

    The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes) will be compared to the percent lactulose recovery at 90 minutes post administration

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  5. Correlation of SBT (% dose recovered at 09 minutes) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Mannitol recovery

    The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose of 13C recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to percent mannitol recovery

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  6. Correlation of SBT (time to recovery of 50% of dose) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Mannitol recovery

    The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes) will be compared to percent mannitol recovery

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  7. Characterize the relationship between SBT (% of dose recovered at 90 min) and baseline childhood anthropometrics (attained length)

    We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and LAZ (length for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  8. Characterize the relationship between SBT (time to recovery of 50% of dose) and baseline childhood anthropometrics (attained length)

    We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and LAZ (length for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  9. Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood anthropometrics (attained weight)

    We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as the cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and WAZ (weight for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  10. Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood anthropometrics (attained weight for height)

    We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and WAZ (weight for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  11. Characterize the relationship between SBT (time to 50% recovery of 13C) and childhood linear growth, 3 months

    We will compare values for the 13C-SBT expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and change in length for age Z score (WHO 2006 reference standards) over the subsequent 3 months

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  12. Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood linear growth, 6 months

    We will compare values for the 13C-SBT expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and change in length for age Z score (WHO 2006 reference standards) over the subsequent 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  13. Characterize the relationship between SBT (% dose recovered at 90 min)and childhood linear growth, 3 months

    We will compare the 13C-SBT tests results (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) and change in LAZ over the subsequent 3 months

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

  14. Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood linear growth

    We will compare the 13C-SBT tests results (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) and change in LAZ over the subsequent 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery 90min) and fecal myeloperoxidase

    Compare fecal myeloperoxidase concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT (% of cumulative dose recovered at 90 minutes, expressed as %)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  2. Assess the relationship between SBT ( time to recovery of 50% of the 13C-tracer) and fecal myeloperoxidase

    Compare fecal myeloperoxidase concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT (time to recovery of 50% of the administered 13C tracer, measured in minutes)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  3. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery 90 min) and serum fatty acid binding protein

    Compare serum fatty acid binding protein concentration (ng/mL), with 13SBT as assessed by % of administered dose recovered at 90 minutes

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  4. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (time to 50% recovery) and serum fatty acid binding protein concentration

    Compare serum fatty acid binding protein concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT as measured by the time (in minutes) to the recovery of 50% of the administered dose of 13C.

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  5. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (time to 50% recovery) and kynurenine tryptophan ratio

    Compare time to recovery of 50% of 13C probe of SBT with kynurenine tryptophan ratio (molar ratio of KT multiplied by 1000)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  6. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery at 90 minutes) and kynurenine tryptophan ratio,

    Compare 13C SBT as measured by % recovery of 13C probe at 90 minutes with kynurenine tryptophan ratio

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  7. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT as assessed by percent of 13C tracer recovered in at 90 minutes and fecal alpha-antitrypsin concentration

    Compare 13CSBT as measured by the percent of tracer recovered at 90 minutes with fecal anti-trypsin concentration (mg/g)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  8. Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT as measured by the time to 50% recovery of 13C and fecal alpha-antitrypsin

    Compare 13C SBT as measured by the time to 50% recovery of 13C with fecal anti-trypsin concentration (mg/g)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

Other outcomes

  1. Reproducibility of the 13C-SBT test , percent of dose recovered in first 90 minutes

    We will assess the coefficient of variation and correlation coefficient between repeated cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration on separate SBT tests administered one week apart done on the same child (Peru site only).

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  2. Reproducibility of the 13C-SBT test, time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes

    We will assess the coefficient of variation and correlation coefficient between repeated SBT tests 7 days apart as assessed by the time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes from the same child (Peru site only).

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  3. Epidemiologic factors that influence 13C-SBT measure, percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes

    Determine if significant associations exist between 13C-SBT measured as cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and the WAMI index.The WAMI index is a previously validated composite index of environmental variables to create a index that expresses the socioeconomic and physical environment in diverse geographical contexts (PMID 24656134)

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

  4. Epidemiologic factors that influence 13C-SBT measure, time to 50% AUC recovered

    Determine if significant associations exist between 13C-SBT measured as the time to recovery of 50% of the administered tracer and the WAMI index. The WAMI index is a previously validated composite index of environmental variables to create a index that expresses the socioeconomic and physical environment in diverse geographical contexts ((PMID 24656134).

    Time frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

07

Study locations

5 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Flinders University
    Adelaide, Australia
    Recruiting
  • Nutrition and Clincial Services Division, icddr, b
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Recruiting
  • CBCI Society for Medical Education, St John's Research Institute
    Bengaluru, India
    Recruiting
  • Tropical Metabolism Research Unit, University of West Indies
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Not yet recruiting
  • Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology
    Kakamega, Kenya
    Recruiting
  • Investigaciones Biomedicas, Asociacion Benefica PRISMA
    Iquitos, Peru
    Completed
  • Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre
    East Kilbride, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Tropical Gastroenterology & Nutrition Ltd
    Lusaka, Zambia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Tropical Diseases Research Centre
    Ndola, Zambia
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee GO, Schillinger R, Shivakumar N, Whyte S, Huq S, Ochieng Konyole S, Chileshe J, Paredes-Olortegui M, Owino V, Yazbeck R, Kosek MN, Kelly P, Morrison D. Optimisation, validation and field applicability of a 13C-sucrose breath test to assess intestinal function in environmental enteropathy among children in resource poor settings: study protocol for a prospective study in Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Jamaica, Peru and Zambia. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e035841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035841. PubMed 33203623 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2022, 34 months after the start.

Of 35 observational studies under Intestinal Diseases, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 102. This study's planned 34 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2019
First posted
Sep 30, 2019
StartActual
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 2022
Last update
Oct 6, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04109352
Collaborators
International Atomic Energy Agency, Flinders University, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, St. John's Research Institute, The University of The West Indies, Mmust Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Asociacion Benefica Prisma, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, University of Michigan, Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Zambia, Gastroenterology Services, Ltd.
Responsible party
Margaret Kosek, MD (Associate Professor, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2021

Study contacts

Margaret N Kosek, MD
Contact
mkosek@virginia.edu
434-243-9552
Victor Owino, PhD
Contact
V.Owino@iaea.org
Victor Owino, PhD
study chair · International Atomic Energy Agency

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion