A Phase 2 interventional study of Cetuximab and Cisplatin in Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage IV HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 and KRAS Protein Variant, sponsored by Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-01.
Sponsored by Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase II trial studies how well radiation therapy and cisplatin with or without cetuximab works in treating patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) positive, KRAS-variant stage III-IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, may help the body?s immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving radiation therapy, cisplatin, and cetuximab may work better in treating patients with HPV positive, KRAS-variant oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma compared to radiation therapy and cisplatin alone.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients in terms of overall survival (OS) at 2 years.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of patterns of failure at 6 months and 2 years.
II. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years.
III. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years.
IV. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) at 2 and 5 years.
V. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of OS at 5 years.
VI. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of acute toxicity profiles at the end of radiation, at 1 month, and at 6 months.
VII. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of late toxicity profiles at 1 and 2 years.
VIII. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of patient-reported swallowing outcomes at 6 months and 1 and 2 years.
IX. To assess the predictive value of fludeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) at 10-14 weeks post-treatment.
X. To assess the predictive value of additional blood and tissue biomarkers for disease outcomes at 2 years.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the impact of cetuximab on the immune response as well as treatment outcome and toxicity.
II. To evaluate biomarkers for immune response in HPV-associated OPSCC through saliva and blood samples to be collected prior to treatment and at each follow-up visit.
III. To evaluate for additional checkpoint targets through tumor tissue taken at the time of initial biopsy and profiled for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, activation markers, and antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) utilization/diversity.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Beginning on day 0, patients undergo radiation therapy over 6 weeks for a total of 35 fractions. Patients also receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) over 1-2 hours on days 0 and 21.
ARM II: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 120 minutes 5-7 days prior to start of radiation therapy and then IV over 60 minutes weekly on Monday or Tuesday for 7 weeks. Patients also undergo radiation therapy and receive cisplatin as in Arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2-4 weeks, every 12 weeks for 2 years, and then every 3-12 months for up to 5 years.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 396 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.
Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (5%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Lifetime cumulative smoking history of \< 10 pack-years. The cumulative total of the number of pack-years during each period of active smoking is the lifetime cumulative history
Exclusion Criteria:
History of another primary invasive malignancy except for:
Beginning on day 0, patients undergo radiation therapy over 6 weeks for a total of 35 fractions. Patients also receive cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours on days 0 and 21.
Drug: Cisplatin · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Other: Questionnaire Administration · Radiation: Radiation Therapy
Patients receive cetuximab IV over 120 minutes 5-7 days prior to start of radiation therapy and then IV over 60 minutes weekly on Monday or Tuesday for 7 weeks. Patients also undergo radiation therapy and receive cisplatin as in Arm I.
Biological: Cetuximab · Drug: Cisplatin · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Other: Questionnaire Administration · Radiation: Radiation Therapy
Given IV
Also known as: Cetuximab Biosimilar CDP-1, Cetuximab Biosimilar CMAB009, Cetuximab Biosimilar KL 140, Chimeric Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric MoAb C225, Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody C225, Erbitux, IMC-C225
Given IV
Also known as: Abiplatin, Blastolem, Briplatin, CDDP, Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloro Platinum (II), Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, Cis-dichloroammine Platinum (II), Cis-platinous Diamine Dichloride, Cis-platinum, Cis-platinum II, Cis-platinum II Diamine Dichloride, Cismaplat, Cisplatina, Cisplatinum, Cisplatyl, Citoplatino, Citosin, Cysplatyna, DDP, Lederplatin, Metaplatin, Neoplatin, Peyrone''s Chloride, Peyrone''s Salt, Placis, Plastistil, Platamine, Platiblastin, Platiblastin-S, Platinex, Platinol, Platinol- AQ, Platinol-AQ, Platinol-AQ VHA Plus, Platinoxan, Platinum, Platinum Diamminodichloride, Platiran, Platistin, Platosin
Ancillary studies
Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo radiation therapy
Also known as: Cancer Radiotherapy, Irradiate, Irradiated, irradiation, Radiation, Radiotherapeutics, RADIOTHERAPY, RT, Therapy, Radiation
Overall survival (OS)
OS will be estimated in each study arm by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Summaries of the number and percentage of patients who have died, are still in survival follow-up, are lost to follow-up and have withdrawn consent will be provided along with median OS. Furthermore, a binomial test of proportions will be used to test difference in 2-year OS between the two arms. Exact tests and continuity correction strategies will be considered when appropriate.
Time frame: From time of randomization to death due to any cause, assessed at 2 years
Primary tumor control
Will be determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version (v). 1.1. Kaplan-Meier estimate will be used to describe primary control rate for each arm. Furthermore, log-rank test will be used to test the difference between primary tumor control between the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Locoregional recurrence rate
Will be determined by surveillance imaging, with failure defined as appearance of new disease in the head and neck from the date of randomization. Kaplan-Meier estimate will be used to describe locoregional recurrence rate for each arm. Furthermore, log-rank test will be used to test difference in locoregional recurrence rates between the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Acute toxicity
Will be evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. The safety analysis set will be used for safety analyses. The overall safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the study period. All adverse event (AE) data will be listed individually by treatment group and patient identifier.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Late toxicity
Will be evaluated using the CTCAE v5.0. The safety analysis set will be used for safety analyses. The overall safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the study period. All AE data will be listed individually by treatment group and patient identifier.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Germline mutation prediction rate
Will assess if additional germline mutations predict rate of progression free survival (PFS), overall survival and toxicity. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models will be used to assess if the endpoint is a prognostic variable for PFS, OS after adjusting for treatment arms and other clinical variables. Multivariate logistic regression model will be used to evaluate the association with toxicity.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Nonsynonymous mutational load and intratumoral heterogeneity clinical outcome predictions
Will assess if nonsynonymous mutational load and intratumoral heterogeneity are predictive markers for clinical outcome (progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity) using next generation sequencing of baseline and relapsed tumors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models will be used to assess if the endpoint is a prognostic variable for PFS, OS after adjusting for treatment arms and other clinical variables. Multivariate logistic regression model will be used to evaluate the association with toxicity.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change in circulating lymphocytes
Will assess changes to circulating lymphocytes including CD-8, T-regulatory cells, and myeloid suppressor cells before, during and after treatment and correlations with progression free-survival, overall survival and toxicity. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models will be used to assess if the endpoint is a prognostic variable for PFS, OS after adjusting for treatment arms and other clinical variables. Multivariate logistic regression model will be used to evaluate the association with toxicity.
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
This study is terminated, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center