An interventional study of socket shield technique with xenophobic graft particulate and without the use of graft in Fractured Tooth, sponsored by Cairo University. Status unknown. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-24.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Many techniques have been proposed to prevent or rather minimize the labial bone resorption following extraction including guided bone regeneration techniques that has been attempted for many years now to preserve the alveolar ridge dimensions .
Immediate implant placement, flapless implant placement, palataly positioned implants and even platform switching.
However none of these methods were able to completely preserve the coronal part of the facial bone wall, and since the main reason of bone loss following extraction is the loss of the periodontal ligament, it seemed logical that root retention may affect the resorption process,The reason the root retention technique works in its different applications is due to the maintenance of the periodontal attachment including cementum, periodontal ligaments and bundle bone, this principle was used by Hurzeler in 2010 in a technique called socket shied technique.
35 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Fractures; 7 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 40 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Tooth Fractures.
Browse Tooth Fractures studies →Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.
Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: socket shield technique with xenophobic graft particulate and without the use of graft
the jumping gap between the implant and the shield is grafted by xenograft particulate and the control group is not grafted
Marginal bone loss
Will be measured using linear measurements from CBCT
Time frame: • Amount of bone loss will be measured after 6 month using linear measurement from CBCT
secondary stability
Will be measured using Osstell
Time frame: will be measured intraoperative and 3 months after surgery
pink esthetic score
Will be measured using pink esthetic index chart
Time frame: Pink esthetics will be measured using pink esthetic index chart After 6 months.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cairo University