CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04100044Updated Apr 29, 2025

Exercise Prescription for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

An interventional study of Exercise Counseling and Exercise Intervention in Plasma Cell Myeloma, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial studies how well exercise prescription works in improving quality of life in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Engaging and adhering to an exercise program may improve functional status and quality of life and decrease pain and skeletal-related events. This study is being done to see if elderly patients with multiple myeloma can participate in a physical activity program.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Assess the ability for elderly multiple myeloma patients to maintain a personalized exercise regimen and activity level for a period of 6 months.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Assess changes in biometric data.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE I. Evaluate changes in bone metabolism markers as a result of exercise.

OUTLINE:

Patients meet with a physical therapist on day 0 and at 3 and 6 months and receive a personalized home exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and resistance training for 6 months. Patients also receive face-to-face sessions, video chats, or text message check-ins with physical therapist weekly for 6 weeks and then every other week for up to 24 weeks.

After completion of study, patients are followed up every 6 months for 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plasma Cell Myeloma
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of multiple myeloma
  • If patients are undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant, then they will be enrolled after their transplant so that there is not an interruption in the study period
  • Patients are eligible whether or not they have lytic bone lesions

    • If they do have lytic lesions, the lesions must be low risk for fracture (low risk by Mirel's score or less than 50% of vertebral body height)
    • If patients are high risk for bone fracture, they must undergo bone stabilization prior to being considered for enrollment
    • Patients will have to be at least 6 weeks from date of stabilization
  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Subjects need to be within 24 months of their multiple myeloma diagnosis
  • Subject must be able to stand and walk to perform baseline assessments
  • Subjects must be able to text message (will need cell phone)
  • Need to limit to able to read and understand English as video visit capability is only in English at this point in time and multiple questionnaires will not be translated into other languages

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of lytic lesions that cannot undergo appropriate stabilization
  • Anything that would place the individual at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with or completion of the study
  • Non English speaking
  • Diagnosed greater than 24 months prior to screening
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Health Services Research (physical therapist, exercise)

    Patients meet with a physical therapist on day 0 and at 3 and 6 months and receive a personalized home exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and resistance training for 6 months. Patients also receive face-to-face sessions, video chats, or text message check-ins with physical therapist weekly for 6 weeks and then every other week for up to 24 weeks.

    Other: Exercise Counseling · Behavioral: Exercise Intervention · Other: Questionnaire administration · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherExercise Counseling

    Meet with physical therapist

  • BehavioralExercise Intervention

    Receive personalized home exercise intervention

  • OtherQuestionnaire administration

    Ancillary studies

  • OtherQuality-of-Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

    Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical activity adherence

    Will be measured at each assessment using an Actigraph tri-axial hip-worn accelerometers, worn for 7 days at each assessment point, supplemented with patient self-report of exercise in the past 7 days using a physical activity recall to differentiate subtypes of physical activity. Will estimate the proportion of participants who maintained their target level, along with an exact 95% confidence interval. We will use an exact binomial test to assess whether adherence exceeds 50%. Adherence to the exercise prescriptions will be measured with the absolute and relative increase from baseline in min/week of aerobic and resistance exercise at 3 months and 6 months (benchmark: min/week of exercise changes by \> 100% and a minimum of 90 min/week at 6 months). The percent of prescribed minutes of exercise performed at 3 and 6 months also will be calculated with goal of adherence greater than 50%.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  2. Retention

    Will be measured by percent number of days the patient wears the provided FitBit during the 6-month period.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in short physical performance battery protocol

    The Short Physical Performance Battery Protocol is a test consisting of three sections (Balance, Gait Speed, and Chair Stand). The score for the Short Physical Performance Battery Protocol is scored as a total of the points earned in each section. Scores range from a total of 0 to 12 points. Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  2. Change in 6 minute walk test

    Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  3. Change in grip strength

    Grip strength will be measured using a dynamometer, which gives results in kg of force. Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  4. Change in Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test

    Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  5. Change in frailty score

    Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in bone metabolism markers

    Will include bone specific alkaline phosphatase, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase, C-terminal telopeptide fragment of type 1 collagen, and metabolomics signatures. Will trend metabolomics signatures as described above over time for individual participants and relate them to exercise adherence. Samples will be randomized in order to avoid machine drifts. All measurements will be carried out at least in triplicate and the false discovery rate will be used for hypothesis testing to determine the rate of type I errors when conducting multiple comparisons.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  2. Change in pain level

    Will be measured by Brief Pain Inventory. There are 9 total questions consisting of: 1 diagram, 1 yes/no, 1 item to list pain medications/treatments, 5 questions with an 11-point rating scale, and one question with sub-items A-G with an 11-point rating scale for each sub-item. Scored as follows: Pain Severity Score = Mean of items 3-6 (pain at its worst, pain at its least, average Pain Interference Score = Mean of items 9A-9G (interference of pain with: general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life).

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  3. Change in quality of life (QOL)

    Will be measured by European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer - QOL survey. There are 20 questions on a 4 point scale. Scores range from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

  4. Participant satisfaction

    This is an 8 question survey with likert scale answers. Will be measured by a participant satisfaction questionnaire as well as open feedback questions to guide future studies.

    Time frame: At 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04100044
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2019
Start date
Oct 24, 2019
Primary completion
May 27, 2022
Completion
May 27, 2022
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Adam Binder, MD
principal investigator · Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion