A Phase 3 interventional study of Mirogabalin and Placebo in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.. Completed at 40 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-24.
Sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in Chinese participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in comparison to placebo.
The primary objective is to compare change from baseline in weekly Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) at Week 14 in Chinese patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP) receiving mirogabalin versus placebo.
1,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 256 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 393 is above the median of 52 across 973 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.
Browse Neuralgia studies →Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 72 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (80%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Mirogabalin 15 mg, oral administration, Treatment period; 2-weeks titration and 12-weeks maintenance dose.
Drug: Mirogabalin
Placebo (14-weeks)
Drug: Placebo
Mirogabalin tablets for oral administration
Also known as: DS-5565
Matching placebo tablets for oral administration
Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS)
The pain scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst possible pain. The weekly ADPS is based on participants daily pain scores.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
ADPS responder rate
Ratio of Participants Responding to Treatment, as Measured by Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) Reduction from Baseline. The ADPS is used to determine categorical response rates.
Time frame: at Week 14
Pain Intensity Score Using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The VAS, in which the participant rates pain on a 100 mm-long horizontal line, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Time frame: at Week 14
Patient Global Impression of Change
Participants rate their overall impression of how the present pain compares to baseline using a 7-point scale, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Patient Global Impression of Change scores are used to determine categorical responder rates.
Time frame: at Week 14
Average Daily Sleep Interference score (ADSIS)
The sleep interference scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = pain completely interfered with sleep. The weekly ADSIS is based on participants daily sleep interference scores.
Time frame: at Week 14
Medical Outcome Study (MOS) sleep scale
Participants rate their sleep quality during the past 4 weeks in three parts of the questionnaire: Part 1 - The participants rate the average time required to fall asleep, 0-15 minutes = 1, 16-30 minutes = 2, 31-45 minutes = 3, 46-60 minutes = 4, More than 60 minutes = 5. Part 2 - The participants give the number of hours per night for the average hours of sleep per night. Part 3 - The participants using a score of 1 (all of the time) to 5 (none of the time) to rate their sleep disturbance in the following areas: difficulty in falling asleep or remaining asleep, difficulty in staying awake during the day, difficulty in breathing, and snoring during sleep.
Time frame: at Week 14
Five Level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) version
Participants rate their Quality of Life in the following dimensions: mobility (5-point scale), self-care (5-point scale), usual activities (5-point scale), pain/discomfort (5-point scale), and anxiety/depression(5-point scale) that are combined into an overall health utilities index. Participants also rate their perception of overall health using VAS, with zero indicating worst health and 100 representing best imaginable health.
Time frame: at Week 14
Actigraphy signal collected from a wrist-worn medical-grade sensor
Result of physical activity during waking hours and participants' sleep will be evaluated to explore a relationship between participants reported outcomes and actigraphy signal collected from a wrist-worn medical-grade sensor (ActiGraph GT9X Link). Only participants who signed a separate informed consent form for wearing medical-grade sensor will be included in this evaluation.
Time frame: at Week 14
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.