CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04091659Updated Dec 22, 2020Results posted

Use of Virtual Reality for Overdose Management Educational Trainings

An interventional study of Virtual Reality Education and Standard Education in Drug Overdose and Virtual Reality, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-22.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cluster-randomized trial will compare changes in attitudes and knowledge on administering naloxone based on exposure to either a virtual reality educational training or the current standard educational trainings (e.g. on-line videos, printed information handouts) offered at local libraries. Individuals attending local library's naloxone training days will voluntarily complete an anonymous validated survey pre and post attending either the virtual reality or standard educational training.

Read the detailed description

This study will utilize a cluster-randomized trial design. Entire libraries will be randomized to either offer community members the virtual reality training or the standard educational offerings (e.g. handouts, online videos). Volunteers will be asked to complete the brief, anonymous, and validated Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale prior to receiving an education intervention (pretest) and then again immediately after (posttest). Neither participants nor investigators will be blinded. Library patrons who do not participate in the study will be offered current standard training materials. Regardless of the library's randomization, to either virtual reality or standard training, all patrons completing pre and post test surveys will have the opportunity to view the virtual reality training or other public health department materials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Drug Overdose
  • Virtual Reality

Browse trials for

03

In context

Drug Overdose

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Drug Overdose; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is close to the median of 100 across 98 interventional studies indexed under Drug Overdose.

Browse Drug Overdose studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to complete paper surveys independently
  • Provide verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete immediate post-training assessment
  • Individuals under 18 years of age
  • Individuals who cannot communicate in English and provide consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Education

    Standard Educational (Control): The public health department's training includes printed handouts on how to administer naloxone and youtube videos on how to spot signs and symptoms of overdose and administer naloxone. Additionally, staff are on hand to provide one on one verbal educational trainings to local community members voluntarily seeking education.

    Other: Standard Education

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality

    Virtual Reality Education (Intervention): The experimental group of libraries will receive the virtual reality simulation, which is guided by the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory, and lasts 9 minutes. The virtual reality education is based on scenes and dialogue conducted during the hybrid high-fidelity simulation, from a script developed using the existing hybrid simulation on opioid overdose intervention. This virtual reality education is an educational intervention.

    Other: Virtual Reality Education

Interventions

  • OtherVirtual Reality Education

    Virtual Reality Education (Intervention): The experimental group of libraries will receive the virtual reality simulation, which is guided by the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory, and lasts 9 minutes. The virtual reality education is based on scenes and dialogue conducted during the hybrid high-fidelity simulation, from a script developed using the existing hybrid simulation on opioid overdose intervention. This virtual reality education is an educational intervention.

  • OtherStandard Education

    Standard Educational (Control): The public health department's training includes printed handouts on how to administer naloxone and youtube videos on how to spot signs and symptoms of overdose and administer naloxone. Additionally, staff are on hand to provide one on one verbal educational trainings to local community members voluntarily seeking education.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) From Pre- to Post-training

    Higher scores on the OOKS indicate greater knowledge on how to identify and appropriately intervene during an opioid related overdose, including proper use of naloxone. The tool has been validated with healthcare professionals and lay persons and used to assess changes in knowledge and attitudes after in-person naloxone trainings. This main outcome of this study is examining changes in the OOKS subscale for signs of an opioid overdose with scores ranging from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Immediately Pre-Training and Within 1 Hour Post-training

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) From Pre- to Post-training

    The OOAS subscales assessing competencies to manage an opioid overdose (5 items). Study participants were given intranasal naloxone, so all items were adapted to refer to intranasal naloxone rather than injectable naloxone. OOAS items were scored on a Likert-type scale and higher scores suggested more favorable attitudes towards opioid overdose response, where 1=completely disagree, and 5=completely agree

    Time frame: Immediately Pre-Training and Within 1 Hour Post-training

07

Results

Posted Feb 12, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard EducationVirtual Reality
Started4058
Completed3757
Not completed31
Withdrew: Protocol violation30
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) From Pre- to Post-training

Higher scores on the OOKS indicate greater knowledge on how to identify and appropriately intervene during an opioid related overdose, including proper use of naloxone. The tool has been validated with healthcare professionals and lay persons and used to assess changes in knowledge and attitudes after in-person naloxone trainings. This main outcome of this study is examining changes in the OOKS subscale for signs of an opioid overdose with scores ranging from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Immediately Pre-Training and Within 1 Hour Post-training
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Change in Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) From Pre- to Post-training
units on a scaleStandard EducationVirtual Reality
Change in Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) From Pre- to Post-training2 (1 to 2)1 (0 to 3)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Education vs Virtual Reality · SEM · p = 0.65 · Mean difference (final values): -0.18 · 95% CI -0.85 to 0.49
SecondaryChange in Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) From Pre- to Post-training

The OOAS subscales assessing competencies to manage an opioid overdose (5 items). Study participants were given intranasal naloxone, so all items were adapted to refer to intranasal naloxone rather than injectable naloxone. OOAS items were scored on a Likert-type scale and higher scores suggested more favorable attitudes towards opioid overdose response, where 1=completely disagree, and 5=completely agree

Time frame:
Immediately Pre-Training and Within 1 Hour Post-training
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Change in Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) From Pre- to Post-training
units on a scaleStandard EducationVirtual Reality
Change in Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) From Pre- to Post-training1 (0.57 to 4.9)1 (0.71 to 1.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Education vs Virtual Reality · SEM · p = 0.02 · Mean difference (final values): 0.26 · 95% CI 0.02 to 0.50The control group, standard education, was the reference

Adverse events

Collected over Not monitored/assessed. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Education———
Virtual Reality———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard EducationVirtual RealityTotal
Median40 (25 to 55)41 (30 to 60)40 (27 to 57)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Standard EducationVirtual RealityTotal
Male122234
Female243357
Nonbinary123
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard EducationVirtual RealityTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American111324
White142135
More than one race122335
Unknown or Not Reported000
OOKS
OOKS(units on a scale)Standard EducationVirtual RealityTotal
Median5 (4 to 6)5 (3 to 7)5 (4 to 6)
OOAS
OOAS(units on a scale)Standard EducationVirtual RealityTotal
Median3.3 (3.1 to 3.6)3.4 (3.0 to 3.9)3.4 (3.0 to 3.7)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 22, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Aug 22, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected IPD will be made available upon request with approved IRB from requesting institution

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04091659
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Nicholas Giordano, PhD, RN (Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2019
Start date
Sep 18, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2020
Completion
Jan 16, 2020
Results posted
Feb 12, 2020
Last update
Dec 22, 2020

Study contacts

Nicholas A Giordano
principal investigator · Lecturer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion