CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04084028Updated Jul 8, 2021Results posted

Cooking as a Health Behavior in College Students

An interventional study of Active Cooking Classes and Meal Kits in Diet, Healthy, sponsored by University of Vermont. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-08.

Sponsored by University of Vermont · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Students who live off campus at the University of Vermont will be recruited to participate in the study which will begin in Fall 2019 and run through May 2020. The intervention is a randomized-controlled trial where students will be randomized into one of four conditions: 1) Active cooking classes followed by meal kits and recipes, 2) Active cooking classes followed by no further instruction, 3) No cooking classes followed by meal kits and recipes, or 4) No intervention. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and following each phase.

Read the detailed description

The proposed pilot study is a randomized trial to evaluate whether cooking classes produce greater gains in cooking skills, food agency, and cooking frequency than meal kits or no intervention. There will be three phases to the study intervention and four study conditions (as outlined below).

Phase 1- Cooking classes. All participants will attend 1 kitchen intensive session followed by 1 cooking class per week for 6 weeks

Phase 2- Meal Kits. Assigned participants will receive meal kit deliveries once per week for 6 weeks.

Phase 3- Recipes. Assigned participants will receive 5 healthy recipes by email once per week for 6 weeks. This phase was planned, but was canceled due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak.

The investigators will randomize 64 students to one of four intervention conditions.

Group A (n=16) - Active cooking classes followed by meal kits and recipes Group B (n=16) - Active cooking classes followed by no further instruction Group C (n=16) - No cooking classes followed by meal kits and recipes Group D (n=16) - No intervention

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and following each phase.

Cooking Classes: Subjects in the cooking class conditions will begin with a brief lecture on the day's lesson followed by a demonstration from the chef instructor. Subjects will then work with a partner to prepare the recipe with guidance from the chef instructor. All participants will receive printed copies of the weekly recipe(s). At the end of the class period all subjects will take part in a sensory experience led by the chef instructor in which they will observe the appearance, smell, taste, and texture, of the meal they have just prepared.

Meal Kits: With the meal delivery service, participants will get all the ingredients they need to make a meal as well as a recipe for the meal which includes step-by-step photos. They are then responsible for doing the actual cooking of the meal. Students will all receive kits for 3 meals per week from the same delivery service and will have the option to select meals that fit their dietary needs (vegetarian, gluten free, etc.). Meal kits are designed to serve two individuals therefore students should have enough food for six meals, though they will only need to cook three times. The service used is open to the public, therefore students who enjoyed the meal kit service could opt to continue service and pay for it themselves. However, students will be instructed to wait until study completion to do so.

Recipes: Recipes will be designed by the research team, which includes three registered dietitians and a trained chef. Students will receive recipes for five healthy meals per week. Participants will need to shop, budget, and plan on their own. Recipes will accommodate major dietary preferences including vegetarian and gluten-free.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diet, Healthy

Keywords

  • food agency
  • cooking
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Vermont is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate students at the University of Vermont living off campus independently (may have roommates but not live with a guardian)
  • Ages 18-25
  • Cooks dinner at home no more than 3x/week
  • Access to a kitchen at home
  • Availability during scheduled cooking classes/demonstrations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students will be excluded from the study if they do not complete baseline data collection measures prior to the first class meeting.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Cooking +meal kits and recipes

    Participants will attend a weekly 2-hour cooking class to learn how to prepare meals. Participants cook and sample the meal at the end of class and the chef will walk them through a sensory exercise. At the end of each class, participants will be provided with the recipe for the next class and asked to create a timeline for the various steps of preparation. Participants will bring this timeline to class and discuss as a group before preparing the meal. Following 6 weeks of cooking classes, participants will receive 6 weeks of home-delivered meal kits. Following 6 weeks of meal kits, participants will received 6 weeks of recipes. Both the meal kits and recipes will accommodate major dietary needs (vegan, gluten-free, etc.)

    Behavioral: Active Cooking Classes · Behavioral: Meal Kits · Behavioral: Recipes

  • Active comparator
    Active cooking only

    Participants will attend a weekly 2-hour cooking class to learn how to prepare meals. Participants cook and sample the meal at the end of class and the chef will walk them through a sensory exercise. At the end of each class, participants will be provided with the recipe for the next class and asked to create a timeline for the various steps of preparation. Participants will bring this timeline to class and discuss as a group before preparing the meal. Unlike the previous arm, no further instruction will be given once cooking classes end.

    Behavioral: Active Cooking Classes

  • Active comparator
    Meal Kits only

    Participants will receive weekly meal kit deliveries for 6 weeks. Following 6 weeks of meal kit deliveries, students will receive emails at the beginning of each week providing them with 5 healthy recipes.

    Behavioral: Meal Kits · Behavioral: Recipes

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants will receive no interventions.

Interventions

  • BehavioralActive Cooking Classes

    6 cooking classes will be held every week for 6 consecutive weeks. The lessons are patterned after Dr. Amy Trubek's cooking pedagogy and will be tailored for those cooking for themselves for the first time. Classes begin with a brief lecture on the day's topic. Students will work in teams of 2 in the foods lab to actively practice skills and cook a meal. Students receive recipes and information sheets that cover pantry supplies, grocery lists, knife skills and cooking equipment. All students attend a 2 hour kitchen intensive demonstration as an orientation.

  • BehavioralMeal Kits

    Students receive 6 weeks of home delivered meal kits. Meal kits include ingredients and detailed instructions for 3 meals, which each serve two people. Students may select meals from a list of 18 options that include vegan, vegetarian, and gluten free options.

  • BehavioralRecipes

    Students are emailed a set of recipes once a week for 6 weeks. Recipes include options for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks. Recipe sets include vegan, vegetarian, and gluten-free options. This intervention was cancelled by COVID-related disruptions and did not take place.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diet Quality at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    Difference in diet quality change between groups from baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2. Measured by Healthy Eating Index scores. The HEI includes 13 components that capture recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. There are two groupings of components: 1. Adequacy components are encouraged. Higher scores reflect higher intakes. 2. Moderation components should be limited. Higher scores reflect lower intakes. A higher total HEI score reflects higher diet quality as defined by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Components are weighted equally and assigned a score of either 5 or 10. Scores as summed to determine total score. Score range is 0 - 100. Adequacy Components: Total Fruits 5 Whole Fruits 5 Total vegetables 5 Greens and beans 5 Whole grains 10 Dairy 10 Total protein foods 5 Seafood and plant proteins 5 Fatty acids 10 Moderation Components: Refined grains 10 Sodium 10 Added sugars 10 Saturated fats 10

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cooking and Food Practices at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    Cooking and Food Practices score at baseline and change at phase 1 and phase 2, will be measured by The Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale (CAFPAS) measures food preparation skills and capacities. The CAFPAS contains 28 items administered with a 7-point bipolar Likert scale. There are three subscales: Self-Efficacy (measures whether an individual thinks their cooking ability and skills are adequate), Attitude (measures an individual's affective stance towards food, cooking and provisioning in different areas), and Structure (measures the ways in which external factors can either hinder or support an individual's cooking and provisioning actions). Subscales are scored by coding responses from 1-7, reversing them as necessary, summing the items and dividing by the standard deviation of the sample population's scores on the subscale. The total CAFPAS score is the sum of the three subscales. The total score range is 3-196. A higher score is associated with improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

  2. Stress Level at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    The Perceived Stress Scale is a reliable and valid measure of perceived stress in adults including college students. Ten questions assess how often one perceives various forms of stress such as feeling unable to control important events, being upset by something unexpected, and feeling nervous. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

  3. Breakfast Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    Breakfast cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

  4. Lunch Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    Lunch cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

  5. Dinner Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

    Dinner cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 8, 2021
Limitations and caveats
The final planned 6-week intervention phase, Recipe Provision, was cancelled due to disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Following spring break, the university transitioned to remote instruction and the majority of the study participants moved back home to live with parents or guardians. As the study was designed to measure cooking behaviors and outcomes in a population of students preparing food independently, the study intervention and data collection could not continue.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits and Recipes OnlyControl
Started1816910
Completed1816910
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDiet Quality at Baseline and Change From Baseline

Difference in diet quality change between groups from baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2. Measured by Healthy Eating Index scores. The HEI includes 13 components that capture recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. There are two groupings of components: 1. Adequacy components are encouraged. Higher scores reflect higher intakes. 2. Moderation components should be limited. Higher scores reflect lower intakes. A higher total HEI score reflects higher diet quality as defined by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Components are weighted equally and assigned a score of either 5 or 10. Scores as summed to determine total score. Score range is 0 - 100. Adequacy Components: Total Fruits 5 Whole Fruits 5 Total vegetables 5 Greens and beans 5 Whole grains 10 Dairy 10 Total protein foods 5 Seafood and plant proteins 5 Fatty acids 10 Moderation Components: Refined grains 10 Sodium 10 Added sugars 10 Saturated fats 10

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Diet Quality at Baseline and Change From Baseline
score on a scaleActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline Score65.11 ± 3.1761.84 ± 3.3761.08 ± 4.4967.84 ± 4.49
Phase 1 Score Change-7.45 ± 3.09-3.52 ± 3.8-7.26 ± 4.37-4.71 ± 4.57
Phase 2 Score Change-4.65 ± 3.37-2.07 ± 4.42-5.7 ± 4.55-4.56 ± 4.63
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.91
SecondaryCooking and Food Practices at Baseline and Change From Baseline

Cooking and Food Practices score at baseline and change at phase 1 and phase 2, will be measured by The Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale (CAFPAS) measures food preparation skills and capacities. The CAFPAS contains 28 items administered with a 7-point bipolar Likert scale. There are three subscales: Self-Efficacy (measures whether an individual thinks their cooking ability and skills are adequate), Attitude (measures an individual's affective stance towards food, cooking and provisioning in different areas), and Structure (measures the ways in which external factors can either hinder or support an individual's cooking and provisioning actions). Subscales are scored by coding responses from 1-7, reversing them as necessary, summing the items and dividing by the standard deviation of the sample population's scores on the subscale. The total CAFPAS score is the sum of the three subscales. The total score range is 3-196. A higher score is associated with improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Cooking and Food Practices at Baseline and Change From Baseline
score on a scaleActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline Score11.7 ± .4711.85 ± .511.64 ± .6712.66 ± .63
Phase 1 Score Change2.03 ± .372.03 ± .46.007 ± .54.87 ± .51
Phase 2 Score Change-.40 ± .38-.21 ± .591.6 ± .55.68 ± .52
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03
SecondaryStress Level at Baseline and Change From Baseline

The Perceived Stress Scale is a reliable and valid measure of perceived stress in adults including college students. Ten questions assess how often one perceives various forms of stress such as feeling unable to control important events, being upset by something unexpected, and feeling nervous. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Stress Level at Baseline and Change From Baseline
score on a scaleActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline Score19.28 ± 1.5518.94 ± 1.6520.33 ± 2.219.5 ± 2.09
Phase 1 Score Change-2.56 ± 1.221.51 ± 1.521.0 ± 1.720.48 ± 1.71
Phase 2 Score Change2.64 ± 1.27-3.68 ± 1.96-4.20 ± 1.8-4.78 ± 1.72
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.91
SecondaryBreakfast Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

Breakfast cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meals cooked
Breakfast Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline
meals cookedActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline1.78 ± .431.75 ± .462.67 ± .614.4 ± .58
Phase 1 Change.78 ± .50.31 ± .610.44 ± 7.1-.31 ± .70
Phase 2 Change1.42 ± .52-.07 ± 7.9.12 ± .74.33 ± .71
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .19
SecondaryLunch Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

Lunch cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meals cooked
Lunch Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline
meals cookedActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline1.33 ± .40.75 ± .422.44 ± .562.9 ± .53
Phase 1 Change.33 ± .39.90 ± .48-.22 ± .55.56 ± .54
Phase 2 Change.78 ± .45.88 ± .62.96 ± .57.44 ± .55
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .77
SecondaryDinner Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline

Dinner cooking frequency was assessed at baseline and following each 6 week study phase using the cooking frequency subscale from the Cooking Perceptions/Attitudes/Confidence/Behaviors Survey. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7 meals cooked during a one week period.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of phase 1, and end of phase 2, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meals cooked
Dinner Cooking Frequency at Baseline and Change From Baseline
meals cookedActive Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControl
Baseline2.7 ± .403.38 ± .424.11 ± .564.7 ± .53
Phase 1 Change.78 ± .45.23 ± .54.11 ± .63.84 ± .62
Phase 2 Change1.45 ± .47-.46 ± .71.11 ± .66.11 ± .63
Statistical analysis
  • Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes vs Active Cooking Only vs Meal Kits Only vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .06

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through phase 2 completion, an average of 12 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Cooking +Meal Kits and Recipes0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Active Cooking Only0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
Meal Kits Only0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)
Control0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
Mean20.6 ± 1.3320.9 ± 1.2320.6 ± .520.6 ± .8420.7 ± 1.1
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
Female12137941
Male432110
Non-binary/ third gender10001
Prefer not to answer10001
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
Non-Hispanic White141491047
East Asian or Asian American20002
Latino or Hispanic American10001
Black, Afro-Caribbean, or African American01001
South Asian or Indian American10001
Bi-racial01001
Relationship Status
Relationship Status(Participants)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
Single181481050
Living with partner02103
Employment Status
Employment Status(Participants)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
10 - 20 hours per week534214
< 10 hours per week754723
No Employed681116
University Standing
University Standing(Participants)Active Cooking +Meal Kits and RecipesActive Cooking OnlyMeal Kits OnlyControlTotal
Junior842418
Senior7127632
Other30003
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Vermont
    Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 14, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Oct 4, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04084028
Lead sponsor
University of Vermont
Responsible party
Lizzy Pope (Assistant Professor and DPD Director, University of Vermont) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
May 18, 2020
Completion
May 18, 2020
Results posted
Jul 8, 2021
Last update
Jul 8, 2021

Study contacts

Lizzy F Pope, PhD
principal investigator · University of Vermont

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion