ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04083417SANTUpdated Dec 4, 2024

Sore Throat in Primary Care - a Comparison of Phenoxymethylpenicillin and No Antibiotic Treatment

A Phase 4 interventional study of Phenoxymethylpenicillin and No antibiotic treatment in Sore Throat and Tonsillitis, sponsored by Katarina Hedin. Recruiting at 6 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-04.

Primary conditionTonsillitisRegistry: PharyngitisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pharyngitis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Tonsillitis
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Pharyngitis to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Tonsillitis, a narrower term within Pharyngitis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Katarina Hedin · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
260
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sore throat is the second most common cause of antibiotic prescribing in primary care in Sweden. Guidelines for sore throat focus on identifying people with sore throat where there are 3 and 4 specified criteria and where near patient tests identify group A streptococci (GAS). In these cases, phenoxymethylpenicillin is recommended.

Studies that have identified microorganisms in sore throat show that there are other bacteria and viruses than GAS, that give similar symptoms and that sometimes no microorganism is trapped despite pronounced symptoms. In recent years, a bacterium F. necrophorum has been identified, which is found in increased incidence of sore throat, but it is also found in healthy individuals. In clinical practice, many patients are treated with penicillin even if GAS is not captured. This may be because the doctor perceives the patient as sick or because other bacteria are not caught with a near patient test which causes the doctor to treat anyway.

The specific aims are to in patients with GAS-negative sore throat and 3 and 4 criteria, aged 15 years and older in primary care, study whether phenoxymethylpenicillin treatment shortens the duration of the disease, reduces the symptom intensity and sickness absence, and investigates the importance of other microorganisms than GAS in sore throat.

The study is a randomized controlled trial in which patients with sore throat are randomized to phenoxymethylpenicillin 3 times daily for 10 days or to no antibiotic therapy. There will also be and a reference group with severe (Centor score 3-4), GAS-positive acute tonsillitis.

Blood samples for inflammatory and immunological response to infections are taken. Throat samples for culture of F. necrophorum and streptococcal groups C and G, as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for bacteria and viruses are also taken at inclusion and at follow-up.

The outcome will be followed in a patient diary for 10 days and at a return visit after 18-24 days where the clinical outcome is asked for and where the blood- and throat samples are repeated.

Follow-up will also takes place via e-mail after 1 and 3 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sore Throat
  • Tonsillitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sore throat
  • tonsillitis
  • randomized controlled trial
  • primary care
  • phenoxymethylpenicillin
03

In context

Tonsillitis Reclassified

103 studies on the registry are indexed under Tonsillitis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 260 is above the median of 100 across 87 interventional studies indexed under Tonsillitis.

Browse Tonsillitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Katarina Hedin is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Compared within Tonsillitis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pharyngitis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

' Centor score 3-4: absence of cough, anamnestic fever (temperature >38.5°C), tender cervical lymphadenitis, and tonsillar exudates (one or both tonsils)

  • Duration of symptoms \< 8 days
  • Rapid antigen detection test for GAS taken and negative
  • Willing and able to give . Subjects under 18 years of age must in addition have the consent from both parents/caretakers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing antibiotic treatment
  • Known or suspected allergies to phenoxymethylpenicillin
  • Suspicion of peritonsillar abscess or indication for admittance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
260 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Phenoxymethylpenicillin group

    Patients randomized to oral phenoxymethylpenicillin 1000 mg three times daily for ten days

    Drug: Phenoxymethylpenicillin

  • Experimental
    No antibiotic treatment group

    Patients randomized to no antibiotic treatment

    Other: No antibiotic treatment

Interventions

  • tablet PcV 1000 mg x 3 for 10 days

    Also known as: Penicillin V (PcV)

  • OtherNo antibiotic treatment

    No prescription of antibiotics

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in number of days from inclusion to resolution of symptoms

    Differences between the randomized groups. Symptom resolution is defined as the first day the item sore throat and difficulty swallowing is scored less than moderately bad

    Time frame: 10 days after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportions of patients with symptom resolution at each of the days 2 through 10.

    Time frame: up to 10 days after inclusion

  2. The number of days from inclusion to symptom resolution of the individual items of sore throat symptoms.

    Time frame: 10 days after inclusion

  3. Differences in number of days from inclusion to the day the patient can put up with the pain.

    Time frame: up to 10 days after inclusion

  4. The possible change in the self-reported items of symptoms on the rating scale for each of the days 2 through 10 and describe the break through day for improvement

    The rating is on a 7-point Likert scale 0=no symptoms, 1= very little, 2=slight, 3=moderately bad, 4=bad, 5=very bad, 6=as bad as it could be.

    Time frame: up to between 10 days after inclusion

  5. The number of days the patient needs to stay at home from work/school

    Time frame: 10 days after inclusion

  6. Proportion of patients with future episodes of sore throat

    Time frame: 30 days and 3 months after inclusion

  7. Proportion of patients at follow up with eradication of each of the potential pathogens found.

    Bacteriological eradication

    Time frame: between 18 up to 24 days

  8. The number of adverse events

    Time frame: 3 months after inclusion

  9. Description of patient characteristics and outcomes in the drop-out group.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

4 of 6 sites recruiting
  • Vårdcentralen Rosenhälsan
    Jönköping, 551 85, Sweden
    Recruiting
    • David Tell, MD · Contact
  • Vårdcentralen Kärna
    Linköping, 586 62, Sweden
    Recruiting
    • Anna Moberg, MD · Contact
  • Vårdcentralen Lundbergsgatan
    Malmö, 217 51, Sweden
    Recruiting
    • Mia Tyrstrup, MD,PhD · Contact
  • Mariehems hälsocentral
    Umeå, 906 51, Sweden
    Not yet recruiting
    • Kia Ericsson, MD · Contact
  • Ålidhems hälsocentral
    Umeå, 907 36, Sweden
    Not yet recruiting
    • Helena Lönneborg, MD · Contact
  • Vårdcentralen Skärvet
    Växjö, 352 36, Sweden
    Recruiting
    • Jon Pallon, MD, PhD · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04083417
Lead sponsor
Katarina Hedin
Collaborators
Umeå University, Linkoeping University, Lund University, Region Jönköping County
Responsible party
Katarina Hedin (Adjunct professor, Region Jönköping County) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2019
Start date
Sep 9, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 4, 2024

Study contacts

Katarina Hedin, Ass Prof
Contact
katarina.hedin@rjl.se
+46761369019
Katarina Hedin, Ass Prof
principal investigator · Region Jönköping County

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion