CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04081246Updated Jul 22, 2026

Transurethral Modified En Bloc Resection For Large Bladder Tumours.

An interventional study of Bipolar transurethral modified en bloc resection of bladder tumour in Bladder Cancer, Bladder Neoplasm and Bladder Tumor, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Modified en bloc resection is a hybrid technique involving piecemeal resection of the exophytic part of the bladder tumour, followed by en bloc resection of the tumour base. In this study, we shall investigate the efficacy of modified en bloc resection for patients with bladder tumours of ≥3cm in size.

Read the detailed description

The biggest limiting factor of en bloc resection is the size of the bladder tumour. Resection of the bladder tumour is technically feasible, but the retrieval of specimen in one piece is restricted by the narrow size of the urethra. However, the greatest advantage of en bloc resection is to ensure complete local resection rather than the theoretical benefit of avoiding tumour re-implantation. Therefore, the concept of modified en bloc resection for large bladder tumours of ≥3cm has evolved. It is a hybrid technique involving piecemeal resection of the exophytic part of the bladder tumour, followed by en bloc resection of the tumour base. By resecting the exophytic part of the bladder tumour, the size of main tumour bulk can be reduced. By performing en bloc resection of the tumour base, the advantage of ensuring complete tumour resection beneath the submucosal plane can be preserved, and the tumour base specimen remains intact for histological assessment of the resection margins. Modified en bloc resection is a promising surgical technique which can potentially ensure complete tumour resection, reduce the need of second-look transurethral resection, and improve the oncological control of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in long run. It may also ensure proper staging of muscle-invasive bladder cancer at the first surgery, thus avoiding the need of second-look transurethral resection in under-staged patients.

In this study, we shall evaluate the efficacy of modified en bloc resection for patients with bladder tumours of ≥3cm. All patients will have MRI before modified en bloc resection. All patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer will be offered second-look transurethral resection in 2-6 weeks' time. All patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer but not distant metastasis will be offered radical cystectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and urinary diversion; for those who refuse or who are considered unfit for radical surgery, second-look transurethral resection will be offered. All patients will have a second MRI before the second surgery. The modified en bloc resection specimen results will be compared with the final pathology results in the second surgery. The presence of any residual or upstaging of disease will be determined. The results of the two sets of MRI will also be compared with the final pathology results. The accuracy of MRI in the evaluation of bladder cancer will be determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bladder Neoplasm
  • Bladder Tumor

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer, bladder tumour, en bloc resection
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 1,163 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 80 years old with informed consent
  • Bladder tumours with maximal dimension of ≥ 3cm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bladder tumour detected during intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy (These patients warrant more aggressive treatment, i.e. radical cystectomy)
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate of \<60mL/min.
  • Presence of clinically significant cardiovascular disease (History of acute myocardial infarction, presence of uncontrolled angina within 3 months before screening, New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, presence of ventricular arrhythmias, or presence of second-degree or third-degree heart block)
  • Presence of GOLD Stage III or IV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • History of bleeding disorder or use of anti-coagulant
  • Presence of other active malignancy
  • ECOG performance status ≥ 2 (Ambulatory and capable of all self care but unable to carry our any work activities. Confined to bed or chair less than 50% of waking hours)
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of metallic foreign body or implant which is not MRI compatible
  • Known history of claustrophobia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Modified en bloc resection

    For patients undergoing modified en bloc resection, piecemeal resection of the exophytic part of the bladder tumour will be performed, followed by en bloc resection of the tumour base.

    Device: Bipolar transurethral modified en bloc resection of bladder tumour

Interventions

  • DeviceBipolar transurethral modified en bloc resection of bladder tumour

    Olympus TURis Bipolar HF-resection electrode (Model: WA22306D)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite outcome on the rate of complete resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and proper staging for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

    Complete resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is defined as the absence of any malignancy upon second-look transurethral resection surgery, in patients who have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer upon the first modified en bloc resection. Proper staging for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is defined as the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer upon the first modified en bloc resection, in all patients who have a definitive histological diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer upon modified en bloc resection or second-look transurethral resection surgery. Second look transurethral resection surgery is expected to perform within six weeks after the experimental operation and one more week is allowed for histological assessment of the second look transurethral resection specimen.

    Time frame: Seven weeks after the experimental operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proper staging rate for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

    The proper staging rate for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is defined as the absence of any upstaging of the T-stage upon second-look transurethral resection surgery, in patients who have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer upon the first modified en bloc resection. Second look transurethral resection surgery is expected to perform within six weeks after the experimental operation and one more week is allowed for histological assessment of the second look transurethral resection specimen.

    Time frame: Seven weeks after the experimental operation

  2. Complete resection rate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

    The complete resection rate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is defined as the absence of any malignancy upon second-look transurethral resection surgery or radical surgery, in patients who have muscle-invasive bladder cancer upon the first modified en bloc resection. Second look transurethral resection surgery or radical surgery are expected to perform within six weeks after the experimental operation and one more week is allowed for histological assessment of the second look transurethral resection specimen.

    Time frame: Seven weeks after the experimental operation

  3. Successful modified en bloc resection rate

    Techical success rate of modified en bloc resection

    Time frame: Immediately post-operative

  4. Negative circumferential resection margin rate

    Rate of negative circumferential resection margin of the modified en bloc resection pathological specimen

    Time frame: One week after the experimental operation

  5. Negative deep resection margin rate

    Rate of negative deep resection margin of the modified en bloc resection pathological specimen

    Time frame: One week after the experimental operation

  6. Detrusor muscle sampling rate

    Rate of presence of detrusor muscle in the modified en bloc resection pathological specimen

    Time frame: One week after the experimental operation

  7. Occurrence of obturator reflex

    Number of participants with obturator reflex encountered by the operating surgeon during the modified en bloc resection operation

    Time frame: Intra-operative

  8. Operative time

    Duration of operation

    Time frame: Immediately post-operative

  9. Rate of mitomycin C instillation

    One day after the experimental operation

    Time frame: Immediately post-operative

  10. Duration of bladder irrigation

    Duration of bladder irrigation. Patients undergoing transurethral resection surgery have an average hospital stay of three days. Bladder irrigation is always stopped before the patient is discharged

    Time frame: Three days after the experimental operation.

  11. Duration of urethral catheterisation

    Duration of urethral catheterisation. Patients undergoing transurethral resection surgery have an average hospital stay of three days. Urethral catheter is often removed before the patient is discharged

    Time frame: Three days after the experimental operation

  12. Hospital stay

    Patients undergoing transurethral resection surgery have an average hospital stay of three days.

    Time frame: Three days after the experimental operation

  13. 30-day complications

    Complications which occur within 30 days after the operation

    Time frame: Thirty days after the experimental surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ukai R, Kawashita E, Ikeda H. A new technique for transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumor in 1 piece. J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):878-9. PubMed 10687997 ↗
  • Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U, Altok M, Zorlu F. Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Mar 19. PubMed 20303646 ↗
  • Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Hernandez V, Kaasinen E, Palou J, Roupret M, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Soukup V, Sylvester RJ, Zigeuner R. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):447-461. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041. Epub 2016 Jun 17. PubMed 27324428 ↗
  • Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, Skinner E, Bochner B, Thangathurai D, Mikhail M, Raghavan D, Skinner DG. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. PubMed 11157016 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04081246
Lead sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
Jeremy Yuen Chun TEOH (Assistant Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2019
Start date
Sep 7, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2024
Completion
Mar 15, 2024
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Jeremy YC Teoh, MBBS
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion