ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04078438Updated Jul 1, 2020

Neurofeedback In Treatment Resistant Depression

An interventional study of neurofeedback augmentation and treatment as usual in Depression and Neurofeedback, sponsored by Yeungnam University Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-01.

Sponsored by Yeungnam University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
Because of researcher foreign training

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2014, registered Aug 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators evaluate the effects of neurofeedback as an augmentation treatment on depressive symptoms and functional recovery in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

TRD patients are assigned to the neurofeedback augmentation group and the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group. The neurofeedback augmentation group underwent combined therapy comprising medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training for 12 weeks. To assess the serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in both groups, a pre- and post-treatment blood samples are obtained. Patients are evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), 5-level version of European Quality of Life Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D-5L), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week.

Read the detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severely disabling disorder resulting in the deterioration of daily function and lowering quality of life. The lifetime prevalence of depression is 10-15%, and the annual prevalence of MDD in the United States is approximately 7%. The World Health Organization has reported that MDD is expected to be the top disease in terms of global burden by 2030. Fifty percent of patients with depressive disorder have a chronic disease course, and 20% of such patients have insufficient responses to treatment despite the use of antidepressant medication. In addition, although antidepressants have been shown to be effective, residual symptoms may continue by stopping the medication early due to inconvenient side effects of the medication. Sixty percent of patients with depressive disorder have poorer executive function. Patients with depressive disorder are continuously affected by deficits in social functioning, such as interpersonal relationships and job adaptation, even if some of their symptoms are improved by medication. Therefore, various additional treatments other than antidepressant treatment have been tried to improve residual depressive symptoms and the remission rate.

Brain waves have been used to measure brain activity and previous studies have reported that different brain waves reflect different brain states, including moods. Neurofeedback is a type of electroencephalography (EEG) training that allows individuals to change the levels of particular types of brain waves displayed on a computer by operational conditioning. EEG studies showed that the neurofeedback is capable of generating long term changes in the spectral EEG topography, while neuroimaging studies represented the neuroplastic effects from neurofeedback treatment. Neurofeedback is an alternative approach that aims to help individuals alter brain activation without introducing electrical or magnetic activity, or pharmacological compounds into the brain, hence preventing the brain from becoming dependent on outside influences for better functioning. It is noninvasive method and there's no report of even minor side effects.

Neurofeedback may be considered a new augmentation treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), even after the use of antidepressants. Some studies have reported improvements in both depressive symptoms and executive function following neurofeedback treatment. A recent article insisted that neurofeedback treatment for depression as having "revealed promising effects in recent clinical trials". However, most such studies have been case reports or uncontrolled studies, and the mechanism underlying the treatment effects of neurofeedback are still unclear. In addition, there has been no study of neurofeedback on depressive symptoms and functional recovery in patients with TRD.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) acts on certain neurons of the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system. It helps support the survival of existing neurons and encourages the growth and differentiation of new neurons and synapses. Previous studies have suggested the presence of an etiological link between the development of depression and BDNF. However, no studies have examined the association between neurofeedback and changes in BDNF level.

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of neurofeedback as an augmentation treatment on depressive symptoms and functional recovery in patients with TRD. The investigators also aimed to identify the usefulness of BDNF as a biomarker for neurofeedback by examining changes in the BDNF level before vs. after treatment in the neurofeedback treatment and medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Neurofeedback

Keywords

  • Treatment-resistant depression
  • Neurofeedback
  • Functional recovery
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Yeungnam University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagosis with MDD according to the criteria for MDD, and especially treatment-resistant MDD (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score ⩾14) despite adequate antidepressant therapy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Brain injury
  • Clinically diagnosed neurological disorder
  • Convulsive disorder
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    neurofeedback augmentation group

    The neurofeedback augmentation group was asked to participate in 12 weeks of combined therapy of medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training. The neurofeedback protocol was determined considering the patient's main symptoms. Patients in the neurofeedback augmentation group received sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) beta or beta training for 30 minutes, and then alpha/theta (A/T) training for 30 minutes in each session.

    Device: neurofeedback augmentation · Drug: treatment as usual

  • Active comparator
    medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group

    To reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions instead of neurofeedback training sessions. These sessions included psychological assessment and supportive psychotherapy. The medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.

    Drug: treatment as usual · Other: psychotherapy placebo sessions

  • No intervention
    healthy controls

    The healthy controls provided blood samples using the same procedure at baseline only.

Interventions

  • Deviceneurofeedback augmentation

    Neurofeedback training was performed using a Neurocybernetics EEG Biofeedback system (Neurocybernetics Inc., Encino, CA, USA). The neurofeedback protocol was determined by the neurofeedback team, which included 3 psychiatrists, in consideration of the patient's main symptoms. The neurofeedback augmentation group was asked to participate in 12 weeks of combined therapy of medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training. Patients in the neurofeedback augmentation group received sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) beta or beta training for 30 minutes, and then alpha/theta (A/T) training for 30 minutes in each session. To reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions. The medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.

  • The neurofeedback augmentation group and the medication-only group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.

    Also known as: medication

  • Otherpsychotherapy placebo sessions

    To reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions instead of neurofeedback training sessions. These sessions included psychological assessment and supportive psychotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points

    The HAM-D is an observer rating scale and 1 of the most widely used measures of depressive disorder. This scale composed of 17 items, and it has been used to assess the therapeutic effect as well as the severity of depression. Total score is 52, where higher scores indicating more severe depression. Hamilton considered Total score of 8-13 mild range, 14-18 moderate, 18-22 severe, and 23 or higher very severe.

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Beck Depression Inventory- II (BDI-II) scores at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points

    The BDI is self-report scale designed to evaluate the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. It is consisted of 21 items including cognitive, emotional, motivative, and physical symptoms of depression. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 points, and the total score ranges from 0 to 63, indicating the higher the total scores, the more severe the depression. It is considered total score of 0-9 minimal range, 10-15 mild, 16-23 moderate, and 24-63 severe.

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

  2. Changes in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) score at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points

    The SDS is a self-report scale designed by Sheehan to assess the severity of functional impairment. This scale consists of 3 items, and each item is divided into 11 levels from 0 to 10 points. It is considered 0 point: none, 1-3 points: mild, 4-6 points: moderate, and 7-10 points: severe. Total score ranges from 0 to 30 and means that the higher the total scores, the more severe the functional impairment.

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

  3. Changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points

    The CGI-S is a single-item scale composed of 7 levels ranging from maximum score of 7 to normal state of 1. This scale is a measure by which the evaluator comprehensively assesses the severity of mental illness regardless of diagnosis.

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

  4. Comparisons of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level between baseline and the 12-week time point among groups

    Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) acts on certain neurons of the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system. It helps support the survival of existing neurons and encourages the growth and differentiation of new neurons and synapses. Previous studies have suggested the presence of an etiological link between the development of depression and BDNF.

    Time frame: at baseline, and 12-week time points.

  5. Type and number of adverse events

    adverse events

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 12 weeks

  6. Changes in valuation of 5 level version of European Quality of Life Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D-5L) (converted tariff score)

    The EQ-5D-5L was developed by the EuroQol Group, and is used to assess 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is consisted of 5 levels, so total 3125 health states can be evaluated. The valuation of EQ-5D-5L (converted tariff score) is an index score calculated by applying weight to each of the 5 EQ-5D-5L questionnaires to provide a comprehensive summary of health-related quality of life. The resulting set of tariff is widely used to calculate preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states. As EQ-5D-5L is translated according to the culture and situation of each country, EQ-5D-5L tariffs may differ at each country. The index score is valued from 0 to 1, and the higher scores indicate the higher quality of life for the patients. In this study, EQ-5D-5L tariffs (index values) were calculated according to the \[The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea.\].

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

  7. Changes in response and remission rate of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score

    Remission was defined as achieving a HAM-D score below 7, and response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in HAM-D score from baseline.

    Time frame: at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yeungnam University Hospital
    Daegu, 42415, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee YJ, Lee GW, Seo WS, Koo BH, Kim HG, Cheon EJ. Neurofeedback Treatment on Depressive Symptoms and Functional Recovery in Treatment-Resistant Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: an Open-Label Pilot Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Nov 4;34(42):e287. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e287. PubMed 31674161 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 66 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2019
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
StartActual
Jun 27, 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 27, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 8, 2020
Last update
Jul 1, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04078438
Lead sponsor
Yeungnam University Hospital
Responsible party
Eun-Jin Cheon (Principal Investigator, Yeungnam University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
Start date
Jun 27, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 27, 2019
Completion
Feb 8, 2020
Last update
Jul 1, 2020

Study contacts

Eun-Jin Cheon, M.D., Ph.D
study director · Yeungnam University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion