CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04076566ProMASUpdated Aug 10, 2020

Malignant Ascites Alfapump® Study

An observational study in Malignant Ascites, sponsored by Sequana Medical N.V.. Withdrawn at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-10.

Sponsored by Sequana Medical N.V. · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Update to clinical strategy - COVID impact
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ProMAS is a prospective post-marketing, single-arm study to assess performance and safety of the Alfapump® system in the treatment of patients with malignant ascites. The study aims to enroll 40 patients in up to 8 sites in Europe.

Read the detailed description

The Prospective Malignant Ascites Alfapump® study is a single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the performance and safety of the Alfapump® system in the treatment of patients with malignant ascites. The Alfapump® system is a fully implantable programmable pump, able to move ascitic fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder via 2 catheters. The Alfapump® has obtained CE (Conformité Européenne) mark approval for the indication of malignant ascites. The primary objective of the study is to assess the performance of the system to remove ascites. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the Alfapump® in the treatment of malignant ascites for a total follow-up period of 9 months, and to evaluate quality of life (QoL) by reduction or elimination of paracentesis requirement. Furthermore the study includes an exploratory scientific objective as to feasibility to obtain 'liquid biopsy' samples suitable for analysis in a non-invasive way after Alfapump® implantation. 40 patients with malignant ascites will be enrolled in up to 8 sites in Europe (Belgium, United Kingdom, Switzerland). Specific sub-analysis of data from patients with gynecological (ovarian) cancer is planned.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Ascites

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • OVARIAN
  • COLORECTAL
  • PARACENTESIS
03

In context

Ascites

252 studies on the registry are indexed under Ascites; 52 are open to participants now.

Browse Ascites studies →

Lead sponsor

Sequana Medical N.V. is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Investigators will be asked to enrol subjects meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria .This study population is highly palliating with overall limited prognosis and significant comorbidities and possibly reduced performance status. Subjects must be under the care of an oncologist specialised in their disease. In the case of hepatic involvement, a hepatologist, and in the case of ovarian or breast cancer a gynaecologic oncologist accustomed to managing subjects with advanced malignancy. Subjects will be enrolled into the trial from the clinical practices of the investigators. Suitable subjects will undergo screening, including detailed medical history, paracentesis history and blood tests, to ensure compliance with study inclusion / exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age;
  2. Subject has provided written informed consent; 3.Subject has recurrent malignant ascites defined as ≥2 therapeutic paracenteses in the month prior to enrolment; 4.Subject has sufficient baseline data documented for at least 4 paracentesis events in the last 3 months pre-implant, including date and volume; 5.Subject has ascites following neoplastic disease, as assessed by physician. In subjects with primary malignancy of the liver it should be confirmed that the ascites is due to malignancy and not due to underlying pre-existing cirrhosis.

6.Subject has a life expectancy of ≥3 months as assessed by the treating physician, and is receiving or intended to receive anticancer therapy.

7.Subject has the ability to comply with study procedures, including all follow-up visits at implanting centre when required, and ability to perform subject-required system tasks (charging). A subject with a caregiver who can comply with the study procedures and to perform the tasks required for appropriate pump function is allowed as well.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has evidence of multiple ascites loculation
  2. Ascites analysis with neutrophil count >250/µl within 24-hours prior to implant.
  3. Subject has acute Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) within 24-hours of implantation assessed by urinalysis.
  4. Subject has skin infection of the abdominal wall at the area of implantation.
  5. Subject has a serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL Subject has
  6. Subject has obstructive uropathy (bladder residual volume >100 mL, determined by catheterization or abdominal ultrasound) in case of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) .
  7. Existing bladder anomaly denying proper catheterization of the bladder.
  8. Subject has active bleeding or thrombocytopenia \< 45,000 X106/L.
  9. Subject on long-term prophylactic anticoagulation
  10. Subject is pregnant or a female of childbearing potential.
  11. Patient has recurrent requirement for MRI
  12. Subject is currently participating in an oncology trial which might be negatively affected by the alfapump as assessed by the treating physician
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicealfapump system

    active implantable device for treatment of malignant ascites

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months

    Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months compared to the baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency. The monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracenteses during month 1, 2 and 3 post-implantation. Baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracentesis in the 3 months prior to pump implantation.

    Time frame: 3 months post-implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 6 months

    Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 6 months compared to the baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency. The monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency at 6 months is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracenteses during months 1 to 6 Baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracentesis in the 3 months prior to pump implantation.

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  2. Safety outcome: free survival

    Therapeutic paracentesis free survival after Alfapump® implantation

    Time frame: Time (days) to first paracentesis after implantation through 270 days post implantation

  3. Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life

    Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation, measured with validated EORTC cancer related Quality of life Questionnaire-CR29 (ColoRectal 29 questions) in subjects with colorectal malignancy.

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  4. Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life

    Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation assessed with validated FACIT-AI 5Ascites Index) ascites related quality of life questionnaire in all subjects enrolled in the study.

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  5. Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life

    Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation, measured with validated EORTC-cancer related Quality of life questionnaire-OV28 (OVarian 28 questions), in subjects with a gynaecological malignancy.

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  6. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by Psoas muscle measurement

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  7. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum Zinc

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  8. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum pre-albumin

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  9. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum phosphate

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  10. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum potassium

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  11. Nutritional status outcome

    Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum albumin

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  12. Pump performance

    Total Monthly volume of ascitic fluid removed (sum of volumes removed during each month via either Alfapump® and via therapeutic paracentesis)

    Time frame: at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up

  13. Pump performance outcome - pump survival

    Pump survival through study completion, up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: Time (days) from implantation until explantation due to technical causes through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

  14. Pump performance outcome - pump survival

    Pump survival through study completion, up to 270 days post-implantation

    Time frame: Time (days) from implantation until first exchange due to technical causes through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

  15. Pump performance outcome

    Frequency of hospitalisations following Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

  16. Pump performance outcome

    Duration of hospitalisations following Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: throug study completion up to to 270 days post-pump implantation

  17. Safety outcome - subject survival

    Subject overall survival after Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: Time (days) until exitus through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

  18. Safety outcome- Bladder metastasis: Freedom from metastatic bladder wall infiltration

    Freedom from metastatic bladder wall infiltration as assessed by cystoscopy

    Time frame: at 6-month follow-up

  19. Safety outcome- Worsening of renal function

    Incidence of subjects suffering Renal function deterioration, defined as a rise in serum creatinine of ≥50% or ≥0.3mg/dl .

    Time frame: at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline

  20. Safety outcome- Incidence of device related infection

    Incidence of Device-related infections following pump-implantation

    Time frame: at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up

  21. Safety outcome- Incidence of Procedure related events

    Incidence of Procedure related adverse events

    Time frame: At 1 month follow-up.

  22. Safety outcome- Incidence of Device related events

    Incidence of any Device-related adverse events

    Time frame: at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up

  23. Device failure

    Incidence of device failure resulting in re-intervention (Revision, exchange or explantation) through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: Through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory outcome- liquid biopsies

    Incidence of successful acquisition of ascitic fluid samples appropriate for oncological analysis via Alfapump® function

    Time frame: 2-days, 7-days, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months post implant

  2. Exploratory outcome - anticancer treatment

    Incidence of Initiation of new / change to existing anticancer treatment through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

    Time frame: Time (days) to event through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hammersmith Hospital
    London, W120HS, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1. No abstract available. PubMed 20633946 ↗
  • Pache I, Bilodeau M. Severe haemorrhage following abdominal paracentesis for ascites in patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):525-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02387.x. PubMed 15740535 ↗
  • Lin CH, Shih FY, Ma MH, Chiang WC, Yang CW, Ko PC. Should bleeding tendency deter abdominal paracentesis? Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Dec;37(12):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Sep 26. PubMed 16185942 ↗
  • Gines P, Tito L, Arroyo V, Planas R, Panes J, Viver J, Torres M, Humbert P, Rimola A, Llach J, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988 Jun;94(6):1493-502. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90691-9. PubMed 3360270 ↗
  • Sola R, Vila MC, Andreu M, Oliver MI, Coll S, Gana J, Ledesma S, Gines P, Jimenez W, Arroyo V. Total paracentesis with dextran 40 vs diuretics in the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 1994 Feb;20(2):282-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80070-4. PubMed 7516361 ↗
  • Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Monescillo A, Vila C, Domenech E, Abecasis R, Angeli P, Ruiz-Del-Arbol L, Planas R, Sola R, Gines P, Terg R, Inglada L, Vaque P, Salerno F, Vargas V, Clemente G, Quer JC, Jimenez W, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Randomized trial comparing albumin, dextran 70, and polygeline in cirrhotic patients with ascites treated by paracentesis. Gastroenterology. 1996 Oct;111(4):1002-10. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70068-9. PubMed 8831595 ↗
  • MEDDEV 2.12-1, rev 7, Guidelines on a medical device vigilance system.
  • Bureau C, Adebayo D, de Rieu MC, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Abbadi R, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rosi S, MacDonald S, Malago M, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM, Trepte C, Watson R, Borisenko O, Sun S, Inhaber N, Jalan R. Corrigendum to "Alfapump(R) system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study" [J Hepatol 67 (2017) 940-949]. J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):630. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Feb 1. No abstract available. PubMed 29395458 ↗
  • Stirnimann G, Berg T, Spahr L, Zeuzem S, McPherson S, Lammert F, Storni F, Banz V, Babatz J, Vargas V, Geier A, Stallmach A, Engelmann C, Trepte C, Capel J, De Gottardi A. Treatment of refractory ascites with an automated low-flow ascites pump in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(10):981-991. doi: 10.1111/apt.14331. Epub 2017 Sep 21. PubMed 28940225 ↗
  • Lai JC, Covinsky KE, Dodge JL, Boscardin WJ, Segev DL, Roberts JP, Feng S. Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):564-574. doi: 10.1002/hep.29219. Epub 2017 Jun 28. PubMed 28422306 ↗
  • Chang L, Ni J, Zhu Y, Pang B, Graham P, Zhang H, Li Y. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: recent advances in circulating extracellular vesicle detection for early diagnosis and monitoring progression. Theranostics. 2019 May 31;9(14):4130-4140. doi: 10.7150/thno.34692. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31281536 ↗
  • Palmirotta R, Lovero D, Cafforio P, Felici C, Mannavola F, Pelle E, Quaresmini D, Tucci M, Silvestris F. Liquid biopsy of cancer: a multimodal diagnostic tool in clinical oncology. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Aug 29;10:1758835918794630. doi: 10.1177/1758835918794630. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30181785 ↗
  • Giannopoulou L, Kasimir-Bauer S, Lianidou ES. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: recent advances on circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Jan 26;56(2):186-197. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0019. PubMed 28753534 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04076566
Lead sponsor
Sequana Medical N.V.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2019
Start date
May 31, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2020

Study contacts

Christina Fotopoulou, Prof, MD
principal investigator · Imperial Hospital, London, UK

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion