ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04066205SLEEPSMARTUpdated Jan 8, 2025Results posted

Sleep Shared-Management Intervention for Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

An interventional study of SLEEPSAMRT in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-08.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sleep deficiency is a public health concern in children with a chronic illness such as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) because it is often overlooked in clinical care, attributed to the underlying chronic illness, and contributes to poor health outcomes. Development of an effective technology-based sleep shared-management intervention that integrate children and parents in the co-design and development of the intervention has the potential to improve health outcomes of children living with JIA and their parents.

Read the detailed description

To develop and test a technology-based sleep shared-management intervention delivered to 8-to-13 year-old children with JIA and their parents. The initial feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the newly developed sleep shared-management intervention will be tested in a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the active intervention against standard care with a sample of 60 children with JIA and their parents. Sleep will be measured using actigraphy, sleep diaries, \& self-report measures. Self-efficacy will be measured before and after the intervention. The long-term goal is to develop effective and low cost treatments to reduce sleep deficiency and the sleep-related health consequences among children with JIA. The specific aims are to:

Aim 1. Apply a human-centered design approach to develop and refine a technology-based sleep shared-management intervention (SLEEPSMART). Direct stakeholder input will be obtained from children and parents about their needs for sleep shared-management as well as intervention material adapted from the Transdiagnostic Sleep-Circadian Dysfunction program for youth that includes four cross cutting components (sleep complaint, education, behavior change and motivation, and goal setting) across the modules and a shared- management focus (motivation, self-efficacy) with children and parent partnering together to improve sleep. Qualitative methods (iterative cycles of semi-structured audiotaped sessions with children and parents and think-aloud observation sessions by a trained observer) will be used to evaluate the usability of the SLEEPSMART prototype. Results of these analyses will guide program finalization.

Aim 2. Determine feasibility and initial efficacy of the SLEEPSMART with children with JIA in a pilot RCT. Study accrual and dropout rates will be assessed, as well as, levels of patient acceptability and engagement in a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing usual care to SLEEPSMART intervention. Preliminary effect sizes of the SLEEPSMART will be determined in youth receiving treatment compared to usual care on primary outcomes of actigraphy sleep duration, self-report sleep disturbances, and feasibility/acceptability, and secondary outcomes include self-efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sleep deficiency, self-management
03

In context

Arthritis, Juvenile

359 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Juvenile; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 229 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Juvenile.

Browse Arthritis, Juvenile studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,431 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Children:

  • diagnosed with JIA, 8-13 years, and parent report that child has difficulties with sleep quality (difficulty falling asleep, no bedtime routine, waking up in the middle of the night and struggling to fall back asleep) and/or poor sleep impacts their child's day to day function (school, interacting with peers, hobbies).

Inclusion criteria for parents:

  • > 18 years, access to a computer or web-based device to complete the surveys, and residing with the child more than 50% of the time

Exclusion Criteria for Children:

  • Diagnosed with a sleep disorder (OSA), positive screen on the pediatric sleep questionnaire for OSA, lack of daily access to the internet, developmental delay, currently taking sleep medication (melatonin), and currently participating in psychological therapy and/or participated in psychological therapy the prior 3 months.

Exclusion criteria for parents:

  • diagnosed with a chronic illness that would interfere with ability to complete study procedures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SLEEPSMART PROGRAM

    Arm: Placebo Comparator (Usual care)-This treatment arm will receive usual JIA care, including annual Rheumatology clinic visits, medications, routine clinical and laboratory tests, physical therapy, follow-up appointments, and no sleep intervention. Arm: Experimental -Each child and parent dyad will work together to create sleep goals, problem solve and compromise to accomplish the goals, and interact with fields in the Web site. The modules will focus on learning a wind-down and wake-up routine, reducing time in bed, reducing sleep-related worry, negotiating sleep in the environment, correcting unhelpful sleep-related beliefs, and sleep maintenance and relapse prevention. The intervention will last 7 weeks.

    Behavioral: SLEEPSAMRT

Interventions

  • BehavioralSLEEPSAMRT

    SLEEPSMART is a web-based intervention that adapted and modified components from the Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian intervention for youth and included four cross-cutting components (sleep complaint, education, behavior change and motivation, and goal-setting) that were integrated into each module. To begin the intervention, participants were provided a link to the SLEEPSMART intervention website for one of the above modules and an online sleep coach each week. At the end of each week, children and parents uploaded the weekly activities and goals via the REDCap link and set up a meeting with the sleep coach to review. The modules took 20 to 30 minutes to complete.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sleep Disturbance

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance an 8-item questionnaire that measures self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, depth, and restoration within the past seven days. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1= not at all/very poor, 2 = a little bit/poor, 3=somewhat/fair, 4=quite a bit/good, 5= very much/very good). The raw scores are converted into a T-score. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-scores suggest more disturbed sleep.

    Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)

  2. Sleep Efficiency

    Actigraphy variable defined as the ratio of total sleep time/time in bed where 1.0 is the most efficient sleep.

    Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)

  3. Sleep Duration

    Actigraphy variable Total Sleep Time (TST), defined as the minutes during the sleep period;

    Time frame: baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)

  4. Acceptability of SLEEPSMART

    Parent and child survey about the likes and dislikes of the study protocol, areas for improvement, SLEEPSMART program and weekly assignments. Items are scored using a 5-point scale, with 1 equalling strongly disagree and 5 equalling strongly agree. Scores can range from 9 to 45 with higher scores representing greater acceptance. A total score of moderate acceptability for the nine items would be 27.

    Time frame: 3 months at study completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-efficacy Child

    Self-Efficacy scale: 9-item self-report of confidence in carrying out sleep-related behaviors; Likert scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident); higher score indicates better self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)

  2. Self-efficacy Parent

    A 9-item survey that assesses parent confidence to manage/control their children's chronic conditions and sleep, emotional functioning, and communication with healthcare providers. Items are rated using a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 = not at all confident to 10 = totally confident. A mean score is calculated with higher values indicative of higher self-efficacy

    Time frame: baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)

07

Results

Posted Jan 8, 2025
Limitations and caveats
1. Single-site pilot trial which may limit the generalizability of the findings. 2. Our follow-up period was limited to one-month post-intervention, and some children and parents may have needed a longer time to see the effects of SLEEPSMART. 3. Study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and stay-at-home guidance may have altered sleep routines and patterns for children and parents.

Participant flow

We recruited 50 children with JIA and 50 parents.

Baseline
Participant flow — Baseline
MilestoneSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Started5050
Completed4840
Not completed210
T2 Immediate Post-Intervention
Participant flow — T2 Immediate Post-Intervention
MilestoneSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Started4840
Completed3834
Not completed106
Withdrew: Did not respond during intervention or usual care53
Withdrew: Did not respond53
T3 One Month Post-Intervention
Participant flow — T3 One Month Post-Intervention
MilestoneSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Started3834
Completed3834
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySleep Disturbance

PROMIS Sleep Disturbance an 8-item questionnaire that measures self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, depth, and restoration within the past seven days. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1= not at all/very poor, 2 = a little bit/poor, 3=somewhat/fair, 4=quite a bit/good, 5= very much/very good). The raw scores are converted into a T-score. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-scores suggest more disturbed sleep.

Time frame:
Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Sleep Disturbance
T-scoreSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Baseline62.1 ± 5.462.4 ± 7.3
2 months57.7 ± 4.358.3 ± 7.6
3 months56.4 ± 2.858.5 ± 7.1
PrimarySleep Efficiency

Actigraphy variable defined as the ratio of total sleep time/time in bed where 1.0 is the most efficient sleep.

Time frame:
Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Sleep Efficiency
ratioSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Baseline.74 ± .08.78 ± .05
2 months.83 ± .05.79 ± .04
3 months.84 ± .07.79 ± .04
PrimarySleep Duration

Actigraphy variable Total Sleep Time (TST), defined as the minutes during the sleep period;

Time frame:
baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Sleep Duration
minutesSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Baseline464.0 ± 46.7483.2 ± 25.1
2 months508.6 ± 57.4483.6 ± 28.1
3 months506.7 ± 48.1488.7 ± 33.4
PrimaryAcceptability of SLEEPSMART

Parent and child survey about the likes and dislikes of the study protocol, areas for improvement, SLEEPSMART program and weekly assignments. Items are scored using a 5-point scale, with 1 equalling strongly disagree and 5 equalling strongly agree. Scores can range from 9 to 45 with higher scores representing greater acceptance. A total score of moderate acceptability for the nine items would be 27.

Time frame:
3 months at study completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Acceptability of SLEEPSMART
score on a scaleSLEEPSMART ChildSLEEPSMART Parent
Acceptability of SLEEPSMART34.1 ± 8.236.6 ± 6.4
SecondarySelf-efficacy Child

Self-Efficacy scale: 9-item self-report of confidence in carrying out sleep-related behaviors; Likert scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident); higher score indicates better self-efficacy.

Time frame:
Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Self-efficacy Child
score on a scaleSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Baseline2.5 ± .82.4 ± 2.8
2 Months2.0 ± .62.3 ± .8
3 Months2.0 ± .82.2 ± .9
SecondarySelf-efficacy Parent

A 9-item survey that assesses parent confidence to manage/control their children's chronic conditions and sleep, emotional functioning, and communication with healthcare providers. Items are rated using a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 = not at all confident to 10 = totally confident. A mean score is calculated with higher values indicative of higher self-efficacy

Time frame:
baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Self-efficacy Parent
score on a scaleSLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)
Baseline5.8 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.6
2 months7.1 ± 1.36.6 ± 1.9
3 months7.5 ± 1.47.2 ± 1.9

Adverse events

Collected over Through study completion, an average of 3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SLEEPSMART PROGRAM0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Placebo Comparator (Usual Care)0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The overall number of baseline participants reflect EACH child and parent( for the SLEEPSMART program 24 dyads child /co-parent dyads received the SLEEPSMART intervention; and 20 children with JIA and their co-parent were in the control group.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)Total
Child10.1 ± 1.710.5 ± 1.810.3 ± 1.7
Parent40.7 ± 5.443.3 ± 641.95 ± 5.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)Total
Child — Female181836
Child — Male628
Parent — Female242044
Parent — Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)Total
Child — Hispanic or Latino4610
Child — Not Hispanic or Latino201434
Child — Unknown or Not Reported000
Parent — Hispanic or Latino459
Parent — Not Hispanic or Latino201535
Parent — Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SLEEPSMART PROGRAMPlacebo Comparator (Usual Care)Total
Child — American Indian or Alaska Native000
Child — Asian000
Child — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Child — Black or African American000
Child — White201737
Child — More than one race224
Child — Unknown or Not Reported213
Parent — American Indian or Alaska Native000
Parent — Asian000
Parent — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Parent — Black or African American000
Parent — White211738
Parent — More than one race336
Parent — Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Washington School of Nursing
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhai S, Palermo TM, Shenoi S, Demiris G, Howard W, Kientz J, Yuwen W, Ward TM. A shared-management web-based intervention for sleep deficiency in school-age children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents: feasibility and acceptability study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Jun;21(6):1007-1021. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11610. Epub 2025 Jun 1. PubMed 40051205 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 23, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04066205
Responsible party
Teresa Ward (Professor, School of Nursing: Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 3, 2021
Completion
May 20, 2021
Results posted
Jan 8, 2025
Last update
Jan 8, 2025

Study contacts

Teresa M Ward, RN, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion