CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04062110UNIFE/GC01Updated Aug 20, 2019

Below-elbow or Above-elbow Cast for Extra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

An interventional study of plaster cast in Radius Fractures, sponsored by University Hospital of Ferrara. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-20.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Ferrara · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2017, registered Jun 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this prospective randomised study was to shed more light on the issue by comparing the capacity of long plaster casts (above-elbow, LC) and short plaster casts (below-elbow, SC) to maintain the reduction of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement (2R3A2.2, according to the AO/OTA classification). The initial hypothesis was that the short cast would be equally as effective as the long cast in treating this type of fracture. The secondary objective of the study was to determine whether or not there is a direct correlation between radiological parameters and functional outcomes in such patients.

Read the detailed description

Distal radial fractures are common traumatic injuries, but their management remains controversial, Hence, we conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, prospective randomised trial to compare the capacity of long casts (above-elbow) and short casts (below-elbow) to maintain the reduction of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement (AO/OTA classification: 2R3A2.2). Eligible patients with AO/OTA 2R3A2.2 fractures treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization were randomized to the long cast group or to the short cast group. Baseline radiological parameters, radial inclination (RI), radial height (RH), ulnar variance (UV) and palmar tilt (PT) were taken, and compared with clinical (DASH, Mayo Wrist and Mayo Elbow) and radiological scores taken at 7-10 days, 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Furthermore, to evaluate correlations between radiological parameters and functional outcomes, patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not their radiological parameters at Follow-ups 2 and 3 were acceptable, i.e. within the range 11-12 mm for RH, 16°-28° for IR, -4-+2 mm for UV, and 0°-22° for PT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radius Fractures

Keywords

  • distal radius fractures
  • above-elbow cast
  • below-elbow cast
  • conservative treatment
  • extra-articular fractures
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Ferrara is the lead sponsor of 110 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • extra-articular fractures of the distal radius with dorsal displacement (type 2R3A2.2 according to the AO classification).
  • eligible for conservative treatment with plaster

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open fractures
  • extra-articular distal radius fracture with volar displacement
  • a history of allergy to the cast material
  • patients scheduled for surgical treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Long plaster casts for type AO 2R3A2.2

    Closed reduction of the fracture and immobilization with long plaster casts (above-elbow, Long plaster casts).

    Device: plaster cast

  • Active comparator
    Short plaster casts for type AO 2R3A2.2

    Closed reduction of the fracture and immobilization with short plaster casts (below-elbow, Short plaster casts)

    Device: plaster cast

Interventions

  • Deviceplaster cast

    Closed Reduction of Fracture and Application of Plaster Cast

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To measure the maintenance of fracture reduction according to radial inclination (Long plaster casts Vs Short plaster casts)

    Radial inclination: angle of the distal radial surface with respect to a line perpendicular to the shaft, a normal 16° - 18°

    Time frame: compared at baseline, at 7-10 days, at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks

  2. To measure the maintenance of fracture reduction according to radial height (Long plaster casts Vs Short plaster casts)

    Radial height: distance between two parallel lines drawn perpendicular to the long axis of the radial shaft, one from the tip of the radial styloid and the other from the ulnar corner of the lunate fossa, normal 11-12 mm

    Time frame: compared at baseline, at 7-10 days, at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks

  3. To measure the maintenance of fracture reduction according to ulnar variance (Long plaster casts Vs Short plaster casts)

    Ulnar variance: refers to the relative lengths of the distal articular surfaces of the radius and ulna, normal -4-+2 mm

    Time frame: compared at baseline, at 7-10 days, at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks

  4. To measure the maintenance of fracture reduction according to palmar tilt (Long plaster casts Vs Short plaster casts)

    Palmar tilt: can be measured by obtaining the angle of intersection between a line drawn tangentially across the most distal points of the radial articular surface and a perpendicular to the midshaft of the radius, normal 0°-22°

    Time frame: compared at baseline, at 7-10 days, at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation RX parameters Vs functional outcomes

    To determine whether or not there is a direct correlation between radiological parameters and functional outcomes in conservatively treated patients for extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement. The following will be used for the clinical evaluation: DASH, Mayo Wrist and Mayo Elbow scores.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara
    Ferrara, 44124, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Caruso G, Tonon F, Gildone A, Andreotti M, Altavilla R, Valentini A, Valpiani G, Massari L. Below-elbow or above-elbow cast for conservative treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 30;14(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1530-1. PubMed 31888682 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04062110
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Ferrara
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2019
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2018
Completion
May 15, 2019
Last update
Aug 20, 2019

Study contacts

Gaetano Caruso, MD
principal investigator · Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion