CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04061577TESSERACT-BAUpdated Jul 20, 2023Results posted

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Neuroprotection in Acute Stroke Before and After Thrombectomy

An interventional study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-20.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Interim Analysis
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This proposal is a prospective, single-center, dose-escalation safety, tolerability, feasibility and potential efficacy study of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in acute stroke patients with substantial salvageable penumbra due to a large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular therapy.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, sham-controlled, dose-escalation study where cathodal tDCS is delivered to threatened but not yet irreversibly damaged (penumbral) tissue in patients with large vessel occlusion who are undergoing recanalization procedure. Patients will be randomized in a 3:1 design, to cathodal versus sham (control) stimulation, at each six designed dose tiers. The dose tiers will be increasing in both intensity and duration of the stimulation. All patients will be receiving the first dose (stimulation cycle) after the recanalization procedure and patients at dose tiers 5-6 will also be receiving stimulation cycles before the recanalization procedure begins.

The occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage will determine the pace of the escalation through the dose tiers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation
  • Bridging neuroprotection
  • Adjunctive neuroprotection
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • New focal neurologic deficit consistent with AIS
  • Age≥18
  • NIHSS ≥ 4
  • ICA or M1 or M2 MCA occlusion on pre-thrombectomy MRA or CTA
  • Onset (last-seen-well) time to randomization time within 24 hours
  • Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale≤ 3.
  • Patient ineligible for IV tPA, per national AHA/ASA Guidelines.
  • Having undergone endovascular thrombectomy with less than a complete reperfusion (\<TICI 2c, 3) for receiving post-thrombectomy adjunct C-tDCS.
  • Undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, per national AHA/ASA Guidelines for patients who are assigned to pre-thrombectomy bridging session at Tiers 5, 6.
  • A signed informed consent is obtained from the patient or patient's legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute intracranial hemorrhage
  • Evidence of a large Ischemic core volume (ADC \< 620 µm2/s or rCBF\< 30%) ≥ 100 ml
  • Presence of tDCS contraindications - electrically or magnetically activated intracranial metal and non-metal implants.
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe contrast allergy or absolute contraindication to iodinated contrast preventing endovascular intervention.
  • History of seizure disorder or new seizures with presentation of current stroke
  • Evidence of any other major life-threatening or serious medical condition that would prevent completion of the study protocol including attendance at the 3-month follow-up visit
  • Concomitant experimental therapy
  • Preexisting scalp lesion at the site of the stimulation or presence of skull defects (may alter current flow pattern)
  • Preexisting coagulopathy, consist of a platelet count of ≤ 100, INR ≥ 3, PTT ≥ 90.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stimulation arm

    Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. There will be 6 dose tiers: Tier 1 - 1 mA, and Tier 2- 2 mA: Consist of a single stimulation cycle (20min) after the endovascular procedure (EVT) in patients with TICI\<2c,3 and negative immediate post-EVT CT scan for definitive evidence of ICH. Tier 3 - 1 mA and Tier 4- 2mA consist of 2 treatment cycles after the EVT in patients with TICI\<2c and 3, and negative immediate post-EVT CT scan for definitive evidence of ICH. Tier 5 - 1 mA and tier 6- 2 mA consist of 3 treatment cycles. The first cycle will be up to 20 min cycle, after initial imaging and prior to arterial puncture, the second and third cycles after EVT in patients with TICI\<2c and 3 and negative immediate post-EVT CT scan for definitive evidence of ICH.

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham arm

    Patients in the sham stimulation arm at all the tiers will have the cap and electrodes in place, and sham switch moved but without delivery of electrical stimulation.

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

    20 minutes of Cathodal tDCS after +/- before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Outcome- Number of Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (SICH)

    Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) is defined as an increase of 4 or more points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score within 24 hours of stimulation associated with parenchymal hematoma type 1 (PH1), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (PH2), remote intraparenchymal hemorrhage (RIH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

    Time frame: At 24-hour post-stimulation

  2. Primary Tolerability Outcome-Number of Participants Completing the Protocol-assigned Stimulation

    The percentage of the patients completing the protocol-assigned stimulation treatment with no intolerability.

    Time frame: After 5 minutes of stimulation period

  3. Primary Feasibility Outcome- Assessing the Speed of Stimulation Implementation From Randomization.

    The median times from randomization to bridging C-tDCS initiation and the time form end of endovascular thrombectomy procedure to adjunctive C-tDCS initiation in the last 10 enrolled patients.

    Time frame: Median time from randomization to tDCS initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (AICH)

    AICH is defined as intracranial hemorrhage not associated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score worsening of ≥ 4. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

    Time frame: At 24-hour post-stimulation

  2. Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Early Neurologic Deterioration

    Worsening of total score ≥ 4 on NIHSS during the 24-hour period after stimulation, with or without intracranial hemorrhage. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

    Time frame: At 24-hour post-stimulation

  3. Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Mortality

    Rate of mortality

    Time frame: At 90 days post-stimulation

  4. Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With All Serious Adverse Events (Anticipated and Unanticipated)

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event that is fatal, is life-threatening, is permanently or substantially disabling, requires or prolongs hospitalization, or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. Anticipated serious adverse events were defined as SAEs that are expected and related to acute ischemic stroke complications such as headache, stroke recurrence, pneumonia, systemic blood clots, Family withdrawal of care, etc. An unanticipated serious adverse event is an SAE that is not deemed an ischemic stroke complication and adjudicated as possibly related to study treatment.

    Time frame: At 90 days post-stimulation

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory Imaging Efficacy Outcome- Assessing Imaging Biomarker of Neuroprotection and Collateral Enhancement

    By comparing the baseline MR/CT imaging with the MR/CT imaging at 2-hour (early) and 24-hour (final) post-stimulation, the following were planned to be measured: 1) Final penumbra salvage proportion, 2) Final hypoperfusion lesion reduction, 3) Early relative quantitative cerebral blood volume (qrCBV) enhancement.

    Time frame: Change in the penumbral volume between the timepoints: baseline, 2- hour, and 24-hour post-stimulation

  2. Exploratory Clinical Efficacy Outcome- Assessing 3 Months Disability

    Examining the clinical outcomes of 3-month modified Rankin Scale. The modified Rankin Scale is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability.The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death.

    Time frame: At day-90 post stimulation

07

Results

Posted Jul 20, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Started10
Completed00
Not completed10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrimary Safety Outcome- Number of Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (SICH)

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) is defined as an increase of 4 or more points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score within 24 hours of stimulation associated with parenchymal hematoma type 1 (PH1), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (PH2), remote intraparenchymal hemorrhage (RIH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

Time frame:
At 24-hour post-stimulation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Safety Outcome- Number of Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (SICH)
ParticipantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Primary Safety Outcome- Number of Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (SICH)00
PrimaryPrimary Tolerability Outcome-Number of Participants Completing the Protocol-assigned Stimulation

The percentage of the patients completing the protocol-assigned stimulation treatment with no intolerability.

Time frame:
After 5 minutes of stimulation period
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Tolerability Outcome-Number of Participants Completing the Protocol-assigned Stimulation
ParticipantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Primary Tolerability Outcome-Number of Participants Completing the Protocol-assigned Stimulation1—
PrimaryPrimary Feasibility Outcome- Assessing the Speed of Stimulation Implementation From Randomization.

The median times from randomization to bridging C-tDCS initiation and the time form end of endovascular thrombectomy procedure to adjunctive C-tDCS initiation in the last 10 enrolled patients.

Time frame:
Median time from randomization to tDCS initiation
Reported as:
Number · minutes
Primary Feasibility Outcome- Assessing the Speed of Stimulation Implementation From Randomization.
minutesActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Primary Feasibility Outcome- Assessing the Speed of Stimulation Implementation From Randomization.12—
SecondarySecondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (AICH)

AICH is defined as intracranial hemorrhage not associated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score worsening of ≥ 4. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

Time frame:
At 24-hour post-stimulation
Reported as:
Number · participants
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (AICH)
participantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (AICH)0—
SecondarySecondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Early Neurologic Deterioration

Worsening of total score ≥ 4 on NIHSS during the 24-hour period after stimulation, with or without intracranial hemorrhage. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute stroke on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Accordingly, 0 is the lowest and 42 is the highest total score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

Time frame:
At 24-hour post-stimulation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Early Neurologic Deterioration
ParticipantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Early Neurologic Deterioration0—
SecondarySecondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Mortality

Rate of mortality

Time frame:
At 90 days post-stimulation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Mortality
ParticipantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With Mortality1—
SecondarySecondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With All Serious Adverse Events (Anticipated and Unanticipated)

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event that is fatal, is life-threatening, is permanently or substantially disabling, requires or prolongs hospitalization, or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. Anticipated serious adverse events were defined as SAEs that are expected and related to acute ischemic stroke complications such as headache, stroke recurrence, pneumonia, systemic blood clots, Family withdrawal of care, etc. An unanticipated serious adverse event is an SAE that is not deemed an ischemic stroke complication and adjudicated as possibly related to study treatment.

Time frame:
At 90 days post-stimulation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With All Serious Adverse Events (Anticipated and Unanticipated)
ParticipantsActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Secondary Safety Outcome-Number of Participants With All Serious Adverse Events (Anticipated and Unanticipated)1—
Other pre-specifiedExploratory Imaging Efficacy Outcome- Assessing Imaging Biomarker of Neuroprotection and Collateral Enhancement

By comparing the baseline MR/CT imaging with the MR/CT imaging at 2-hour (early) and 24-hour (final) post-stimulation, the following were planned to be measured: 1) Final penumbra salvage proportion, 2) Final hypoperfusion lesion reduction, 3) Early relative quantitative cerebral blood volume (qrCBV) enhancement.

Time frame:
Change in the penumbral volume between the timepoints: baseline, 2- hour, and 24-hour post-stimulation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedExploratory Clinical Efficacy Outcome- Assessing 3 Months Disability

Examining the clinical outcomes of 3-month modified Rankin Scale. The modified Rankin Scale is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability.The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death.

Time frame:
At day-90 post stimulation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 90 days after enrollment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Stimulation Arm1/1 (100%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)
Sham Arm———
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive Stimulation ArmSham Arm
Anticipated serious adverse eventsNervous system disorders1/1—
Unanticipated serious adverse eventNervous system disorders0/1—

Baseline characteristics

Study was stopped early.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Stimulation ArmSham ArmTotal
Mean95 (95 to 95)—95 (95 to 95)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active Stimulation ArmSham ArmTotal
Female1—1
Male0—0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active Stimulation ArmSham ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0—0
Asian0—0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0—0
Black or African American1—1
White0—0
More than one race0—0
Unknown or Not Reported0—0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA)
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 12, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Apr 27, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04061577
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
The City College of New York
Responsible party
Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini, MD (Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2019
Start date
Jul 28, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2022
Completion
Apr 1, 2022
Results posted
Jul 20, 2023
Last update
Jul 20, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion