CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04059250NobioUpdated Mar 12, 2021Results posted

Nobio Clinical Study - Demineralization Prevention With a New Antibacterial Restorative Composite

An interventional study of Nobio composite and traditional composite in Dental Caries and Denture, Partial, Removable, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-12.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nobio has developed dental restorative materials with long term antibacterial properties in order to fight recurrent decay/caries around restorations. These composites with incorporated non-leaching antibacterial agents might overcome the vicious circle of newly developed cavities around freshly placed fillings.

The investigators will ask lower partial denture wearers to allow them to place a "gap model" with the Nobio-composite and enamel slab in one denture flange. In the other denture flange a gap model with a standard composite will be placed as control. In the laboratory the investigators will test with established methods for demineralization/caries prevention in the test and control enamel slabs, respectively.

Read the detailed description

As a major issue in dentistry, it has been stated that two-thirds of all restorative dentistry involves the replacement of failed restorations. Secondary caries indicates a lesion developing at the margins of an existing restoration and is the major reason for replacement of amalgam and composite resin restorations in operative dentistry.

In research the use of experimental intra-oral caries models dealing with caries prevention has increased. The most realistic experimental model is the in vivo model that uses living teeth, followed by the in situ model using specimens with natural surfaces held in the mouth during the experimental period. In situ models have the potential to study both fundamental aspects of the caries process as well as more applied research problems in caries prevention in human subjects without actually causing caries in the natural dentition.

To simulate a failed interface between a tooth and a restoration, a gap can be formed between an enamel slab and the restoration prior to a cariogenic challenge. The "gap-model" will be inserted for instance into the denture flanges, and the cariogenic challenge occurs inside the mouth during the wear period..

Nobio has developed dental restorative materials with long term antibacterial properties in order to fight recurrent decay around restorations. These composites with incorporated non-leaching antibacterial agents might overcome the vicious circle of newly developed cavities around freshly placed fillings. The ongoing caries activity due to bacteria around the filling may be interrupted by quaternary ammonium silica dioxide (QASi) particles incorporated in the test composite at 1.2% (by weight). These particles are members of the Nobio Antimicrobial Particle (NAP) family (Nobio, Israel). QASi are synthesized to form a high concentration of antimicrobial groups that are covalently-bound onto a carrier core, such as silica. The resulting micro or nano-sized QASi particles are mixed with other fillers of the dental composite material, during manufacturing. Following in situ placement and light-initiated polymerization, QASi particles are permanently retained in the final dental restoration. Laboratory studies have shown that the quaternary ammonium silica particles are potent antibacterial agents, do not leach out in contrast to other antimicrobials or caries preventive active substances, inhibit the breakdown of the composite, and maintain antibacterial activity over time.

The study is an in situ study. Subjects, wearing lower partial dentures with acrylic flanges on both sides of the mouth will be recruited. On each side of the denture an enamel slab will be placed next to a composite, separated by a tiny gap. On one side of the denture the composite will be Nobio's antibacterial composite, on the other side a regular composite (a Nobio composite w/o particles or another commercial composite will serve as control material. Enamel slab and composite will be recessed into the flange, allowing microbial plaque to accumulate on top of it and especially in the gap.

After wearing the dentures for four weeks with the slabs, decalcification - ΔZ mineral loss - in the enamel slabs adjacent to the gap will be determined by cross-section microhardness testing in the laboratory. Average ΔZ mineral loss will be calculated for the Nobio group and the control group, and difference will be tested for statistical significance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Caries
  • Denture, Partial, Removable

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • composite bactericidal
  • caries prevention
03

In context

Dental Caries

1,107 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 197 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 60 across 915 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.

Browse Dental Caries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • aged between 18 and 80 years,
  • have at least six natural teeth remaining and have a recent history of dental caries
  • wearing lower partial denture (with replaced teeth on both sides of the mouth)
  • willing to wear their denture during the night
  • are in good health, of either gender
  • are in good current oral health with no active caries or periodontal disease (but with a history of caries)
  • have an understanding of the study
  • have saliva flow within the normal range (stimulated saliva flow rate of greater than 0.7 ml/minute)
  • no antibiotics for the last three months
  • willing to comply with all study procedures and protocols,
  • residing in San Francisco or other nearby locales with community water fluoridation (to eliminate water fluoridation as a potential confounding variable)
  • able to give written consent themselves
  • must be able to read and understand English
  • willing to sign the "Authorization for Release of Personal Health Information and Use of Personally Unidentified Study Data for Research" form; data will only be used for research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects who have less than 6 natural teeth remaining
  • subjects who have used a 5,000 ppm fluoride toothpaste in the last 6 months
  • subjects who have used Chlorhexidine or any other antimicrobials (cetylpyridinium etc.) in the last 6 months
  • show evidence of extremely poor oral hygiene
  • subjects suffering from systemic diseases, significant past or medical history with conditions that may affect oral health or oral flora (i.e. diabetes, HIV, heart conditions that require antibiotic prophylaxis)
  • taking medications that may affect the oral flora or salivary flow (e.g. antibiotic use in the past three months, drugs associated with dry mouth / xerostomia)
  • other conditions that may decrease the likelihood of adhering to study protocol
  • in-office fluoride treatment within the last three months
  • subjects who will leave the area and are unable to complete the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nobio flange

    On the Nobio flange side of the lower partial denture the gap model will include a double sterilized piece of human enamel, a small gap, and next to it the Nobio composite.

    Device: Nobio composite

  • Placebo comparator
    Traditional composite flange

    On the traditional composite flange side of the lower partial denture the gap model will include a double sterilized piece of human enamel, a small gap, and next to it a traditional composite.

    Device: traditional composite

Interventions

  • DeviceNobio composite

    Nobio has developed a bactericidal composite, which does not leak out the bactericidal nano fillers

  • Devicetraditional composite

    traditional composite which has no bactericidal activities

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mineral Loss ΔZ

    The mineral loss is determined in the laboratory using cross-sectional microhardness testings of the enamel after the 4-weeks wearing period of the gap-model. The overall relative mineral loss, ΔZ, for each sample is calculated by creating a hardness profile curve by plotting normalized volume percent mineral against distance from the outer enamel surface. The area under the curve that represents ΔZ (µm \* vol % mineral) is calculated using Simpson's integration rule.

    Time frame: mineral loss ΔZ is determined after the 4 week wearing period

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2021

Participant flow

each participant enrolled had TWO flanges (right and left side of the mouth) in her/his removable partial denture; the study design is a split-mouth design - in one side the "Nobio Flange"- the Nobio composite was inserted, one the control side - the "control flange" - the traditional control composite was inserted

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNobio FlangeTraditional Composite Control Flange
Started2525
Completed2525
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMineral Loss ΔZ

The mineral loss is determined in the laboratory using cross-sectional microhardness testings of the enamel after the 4-weeks wearing period of the gap-model. The overall relative mineral loss, ΔZ, for each sample is calculated by creating a hardness profile curve by plotting normalized volume percent mineral against distance from the outer enamel surface. The area under the curve that represents ΔZ (µm \* vol % mineral) is calculated using Simpson's integration rule.

Time frame:
mineral loss ΔZ is determined after the 4 week wearing period
Reported as:
Mean · vol% * μm]
Mineral Loss ΔZ
vol% * μm]Nobio FlangeTraditional Composite Flange
Mineral Loss ΔZ235 ± 354774 ± 556

Adverse events

Collected over Four weeks study period, while wearing the composite inside the denture flanges. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nobio Flange0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Traditional Composite Flange0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

25 participants contributed 25 lower partial dentures. Each partial denture had two flanges - one side for the Nobio unit, the other side as the control composite unit

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean63.7 ± 14.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female8
Male17
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Study Participants
Hispanic or Latino3
Not Hispanic or Latino22
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Study Participants
United States25
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UCSF School of Dentistry, Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Clasen AB, Ogaard B. Experimental intra-oral caries models in fluoride research. Acta Odontol Scand. 1999 Dec;57(6):334-41. doi: 10.1080/000163599428580. PubMed 10777137 ↗
  • Zero DT. In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res. 1995 Nov;9(3):214-30; discussion 231-4. doi: 10.1177/08959374950090030501. PubMed 8615944 ↗
  • Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):10-4. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.47. PubMed 12532056 ↗
  • Maupome G, Sheiham A. Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Dec;25(12):896-901. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00328.x. PubMed 9888223 ↗
  • Kidd EA. Diagnosis of secondary caries. J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):997-1000. PubMed 11700003 ↗
  • Hals E, Nernaes A. Histopathology of in vitro caries developing around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res. 1971;5(1):58-77. doi: 10.1159/000259733. No abstract available. PubMed 5277150 ↗
  • Kuper NK, Montagner AF, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst EM, Opdam NJ, Huysmans MC. Secondary Caries Development in in situ Gaps next to Composite and Amalgam. Caries Res. 2015;49(5):557-63. doi: 10.1159/000438728. Epub 2015 Sep 26. PubMed 26407050 ↗
  • Hollanders ACC, Kuper NK, Maske TT, Huysmans MDNJM. Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review. Caries Res. 2018;52(6):454-462. doi: 10.1159/000487200. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PubMed 29621757 ↗
  • Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 1993;27(4):280-4. doi: 10.1159/000261551. PubMed 8402802 ↗
  • Dijkman GE, Arends J. Secondary caries in situ around fluoride-releasing light-curing composites: a quantitative model investigation on four materials with a fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol%. Caries Res. 1992;26(5):351-7. doi: 10.1159/000261467. PubMed 1468099 ↗
  • Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials. 2006 Jul;27(21):3995-4002. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Mar 27. PubMed 16564083 ↗
  • Beyth N, Houri-Haddad Y, Baraness-Hadar L, Yudovin-Farber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Surface antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of incorporated polyethylenimine nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2008 Nov;29(31):4157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Aug 3. PubMed 18678404 ↗
  • Beyth N, Yudovin-Fearber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Quintessence Int. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(10):827-35. PubMed 20927419 ↗
  • Chatzistavrou X, Velamakanni S, DiRenzo K, Lefkelidou A, Fenno JC, Kasuga T, Boccaccini AR, Papagerakis P. Designing dental composites with bioactive and bactericidal properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;52:267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.062. Epub 2015 Mar 28. PubMed 25953567 ↗
  • Rechmann P, Le CQ, Chaffee BW, Rechmann BMT. Demineralization prevention with a new antibacterial restorative composite containing QASi nanoparticles: an in situ study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5293-5305. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03837-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33608748 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04059250
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
Nobio Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2019
Start date
May 28, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2020
Completion
Mar 10, 2020
Results posted
Mar 12, 2021
Last update
Mar 12, 2021

Study contacts

Peter Rechmann
principal investigator · UCSF - School of Dentistry - Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion