An interventional study of Robot and tDCS on-line and Robot and sham tDCS in Stroke, sponsored by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-14.
Sponsored by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 20 studies in Stroke by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Stroke · National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Among the 20 studies in Stroke by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea, this one is the 7th largest by planned enrollment of the 19 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2017, is one of 17 with no phase, and was the 9th registered.
8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.
Browse Stroke studies →None of the 20 studies in Stroke by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea is open now. The open studies under Stroke, anywhere →
Of the 1,415 Stroke studies recruiting now, 697 (49%) set no upper age limit and 280 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 77 take children under 18; 196 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 19 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
20 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2014; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2017.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Median enrollment 30 across the 19 interventional studies, 46 across the 1 observational. Of the 7 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 20 studies in Stroke by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Effects of upper extremity rehabilitation robot and transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function among subjects with tremor after stroke
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Combined transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) on-line and upper extremity rehabilitation robot
Other: Robot and tDCS on-line
Combined sham tDCS and upper extremity rehabilitation robot
Other: Robot and sham tDCS
Combined transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) on-line and upper extremity rehabilitation robot for 5 times a week for 4 weeks
Combined sham tDCS and upper extremity rehabilitation robot for 5 times a week for 4 weeks
Change of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Change of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Time frame: Change of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia at 4 weeks after baseline compared to baseline
Change of Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Change of Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Time frame: Change of the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb, at 4 weeks after baseline compared to baseline
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremity
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremity
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Composite cerebellar functional severity score
Composite cerebellar functional severity score (Nine hole peg test + click test)
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Jerk during reaching and finger pointing
Kinematic data during reaching and finger pointing using Trakstar
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Smoothness during reaching and finger pointing
Kinematic data during reaching and finger pointing using Trakstar
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Behavioral activation system/behavioral inhibition system scale
In terms of motivation
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Beck's depression index
Beck's depression index
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Stroke rehabilitation motivation scale
Stroke rehabilitation motivation scale
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Intrinsic motivation inventory
Intrinsic motivation inventory
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Numeric rating scale for upper extremity pain
Question about the upper extremity pain (0-10; higher is better)
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Functional reaching test
Functional reaching test
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
modified Barthel index
modified Barthel index
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
% maximal voluntary contraction from upper extremity muscles during reaching task
data from surface electromyography from upper extremity muscles during reaching task
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Kinematic data during scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Kinematic data during scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb, kinematic data during scale for the assessment
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Kinematic data during scale during the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Kinematic data during scale during the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
Started Jun 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 30 months after the start.
Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 30 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea